IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v76y1998i1p33-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weak consistency of the Euler method for numerically solving stochastic differential equations with discontinuous coefficients

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, K. S.
  • Stramer, O.

Abstract

We prove that, under appropriate conditions, the sequence of approximate solutions constructed according to the Euler scheme converges weakly to the (unique) solution of a stochastic differential equation with discontinuous coefficients. We also obtain a sufficient condition for the existence of a solution to a stochastic differential equation with discontinuous coefficients. These results are then applied to justify the technique of simulating continuous-time threshold autoregressive moving-average processes via the Euler scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, K. S. & Stramer, O., 1998. "Weak consistency of the Euler method for numerically solving stochastic differential equations with discontinuous coefficients," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 33-44, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:76:y:1998:i:1:p:33-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4149(98)00020-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brockwell, P. J. & Hyndman, R. J., 1992. "On continuous-time threshold autoregression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 157-173, October.
    2. Darrell Duffie & Philip Protter, 1992. "From Discrete‐ to Continuous‐Time Finance: Weak Convergence of the Financial Gain Process1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. O. Stramer, 1996. "On The Approximation Of Moments For Continuous Time Threshold Arma Processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 189-202, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Podolskij & Bezirgen Veliyev & Nakahiro Yoshida, 2018. "Edgeworth expansion for Euler approximation of continuous diffusion processes," CREATES Research Papers 2018-28, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    2. Yao Tung Huang & Qingshuo Song & Harry Zheng, 2015. "Weak Convergence of Path-Dependent SDEs in Basket CDS Pricing with Contagion Risk," Papers 1506.00082, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    3. Lingohr, Daniel & Müller, Gernot, 2019. "Stochastic modeling of intraday photovoltaic power generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 175-186.
    4. Antoine Lejay & Paolo Pigato, 2017. "A threshold model for local volatility: evidence of leverage and mean reversion effects on historical data," Working Papers hal-01669082, HAL.
    5. Hiderah Kamal, 2020. "Approximation of Euler–Maruyama for one-dimensional stochastic differential equations involving the maximum process," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 33-47, March.
    6. Antoine Lejay & Paolo Pigato, 2019. "A Threshold Model For Local Volatility: Evidence Of Leverage And Mean Reversion Effects On Historical Data," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Ngo, Hoang-Long & Taguchi, Dai, 2017. "Strong convergence for the Euler–Maruyama approximation of stochastic differential equations with discontinuous coefficients," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 55-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rüdiger Frey & Alexander Stremme, 1997. "Market Volatility and Feedback Effects from Dynamic Hedging," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 351-374, October.
    2. Dolinsky, Yan & Zouari, Jonathan, 2021. "The value of insider information for super-replication with quadratic transaction costs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 394-416.
    3. Yan Dolinsky & Halil Soner, 2013. "Duality and convergence for binomial markets with friction," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 447-475, July.
    4. Escobar-Anel, Marcos & Rastegari, Javad & Stentoft, Lars, 2020. "Affine multivariate GARCH models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. P. Brockwell & O. Stramer, 1995. "On the approximation of continuous time threshold ARMA processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Antje Mahayni, 2003. "Effectiveness of Hedging Strategies under Model Misspecification and Trading Restrictions," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(05), pages 521-552.
    7. Antonis Papapantoleon & Dylan Possamai & Alexandros Saplaouras, 2018. "Stability results for martingale representations: the general case," Papers 1806.01172, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Su, Fei & Chan, Kung-Sik, 2015. "Quasi-likelihood estimation of a threshold diffusion process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 473-484.
    10. Andreas S{o}jmark & Fabrice Wunderlich, 2023. "Functional CLTs for subordinated L\'evy models in physics, finance, and econometrics," Papers 2312.15119, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    11. Kraft, Holger & Seifried, Frank Thomas, 2014. "Stochastic differential utility as the continuous-time limit of recursive utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 528-550.
    12. J-P.Guironnet, 2006. "Analyse cliométrique des cycles de croissance de l'éducation en France (1815-2003): vers un modèle à seuil autorégressif," Economies et Sociétés (Serie 'Histoire Economique Quantitative'), Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), issue 34, pages 193-214, February.
    13. Liang, Hanying & Phillips, Peter C.B. & Wang, Hanchao & Wang, Qiying, 2016. "Weak Convergence To Stochastic Integrals For Econometric Applications," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(6), pages 1349-1375, December.
    14. Fadina, Tolulope & Herzberg, Frederik, 2015. "Hyperfinite construction of G-expectation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 540, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    15. Yuchao Dong & Jérôme Spielmann, 2020. "Weak Limits of Random Coefficient Autoregressive Processes and their Application in Ruin Theory," Post-Print hal-02170829, HAL.
    16. Zhao, Guoqing, 2009. "Lenglart domination inequalities for g-expectations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(22), pages 2338-2342, November.
    17. Kasper Larsen, 2009. "Continuity Of Utility‐Maximization With Respect To Preferences," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 237-250, April.
    18. Lingohr, Daniel & Müller, Gernot, 2019. "Stochastic modeling of intraday photovoltaic power generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 175-186.
    19. Radu Tunaru, 2015. "Model Risk in Financial Markets:From Financial Engineering to Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9524, January.
    20. Yuchao Dong & J'er^ome Spielmann, 2019. "Weak Limits of Random Coefficient Autoregressive Processes and their Application in Ruin Theory," Papers 1907.01828, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    21. Detemple, Jerome & Garcia, Rene & Rindisbacher, Marcel, 2006. "Asymptotic properties of Monte Carlo estimators of diffusion processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-68, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:76:y:1998:i:1:p:33-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.