IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Achieving better measles immunization in developing countries: does higher coverage imply lower inequality?

  • Meheus, Filip
  • Van Doorslaer, Eddy

Changes in measles immunization are commonly expressed in terms of a change in mean coverage rates but these mean changes may conceal substantial disparities within societies by poverty status. This paper analyzes trends in both the level and the socio-economic distribution of measles immunization coverage in the 1990s for 21 developing countries with two rounds of Demographic and Health Surveys available. We examine these trends using "achievement" indices that combine trends in means and in inequality. We propose and employ "achievement contours" to illustrate graphically how a greater degree of societal aversion to inequality may affect the ranking of countries in terms of achieved measles immunization coverage. The results indicate that most countries have experienced an improvement in their mean measles immunization rate but that this improvement was often unequally distributed across wealth groups, disfavouring the poor in all countries. Mean improvements were found to be associated with both increasing and decreasing inequality. When the trend in the mean and in the degree of inequality was opposite, the trend in the overall "achievement" score is determined by the assumed underlying degree of inequality aversion. As such, the achievement measure "penalizes" coverage improvements that leave the poor lagging behind.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 66 (2008)
Issue (Month): 8 (April)
Pages: 1709-1718

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:8:p:1709-1718
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:8:p:1709-1718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.