IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012125000035.html

Publicness in highway projects: A multi-criteria decision-making approach to public-private partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Eun Hak
  • Park, Ho-Chul

Abstract

The public-private partnership has emerged as a solution for efficiently implementing highway construction projects. However, PPP tends to focus on profitability, which raises concerns about compromising publicness. This study evaluated the publicness of highway projects by comparing two types, i.e., government-funded and privately-invested. Various performance indicators related to highways were reviewed, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to estimate publicness scores. Based on expert surveys, five key indicators were selected, i.e., benefit-cost ratio, equity, consistency, toll ratio, and road functional classification. The weights assigned to these indicators were 0.580, 0.121, 0.088, 0.078, and 0.134, respectively. The proposed framework was applied to eight highway projects from the national transport plan in South Korea. Each indicator for the projects was evaluated on a 9-point scale, and the weighted scores were calculated by multiplying each indicator score by the respective weight. The overall publicness score for each project was then determined by summing the weighted scores of the five indicators. The results showed that six projects were estimated to be more beneficial with government funding. Conversely, two projects were estimated to be more beneficial with private investment. The publicness score for each project type was significantly impacted by two indicators, i.e., toll ratio and road functional classification. This framework supports decision-making regarding publicness by incorporating the perspectives of operators, private investors, and users.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Eun Hak & Park, Ho-Chul, 2025. "Publicness in highway projects: A multi-criteria decision-making approach to public-private partnerships," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000035
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmadabadi, Ali Akbari & Heravi, Gholamreza, 2019. "The effect of critical success factors on project success in Public-Private Partnership projects: A case study of highway projects in Iran," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 152-161.
    2. Percoco, Marco, 2014. "Quality of institutions and private participation in transport infrastructure investment: Evidence from developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 50-58.
    3. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff, 2011. "Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 2-14, February.
    4. Albert N Link & Caroline S Wagner, 2021. "The publicness of publicly funded research," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 757-762.
    5. Paget-Seekins, Laurel & Tironi, Manuel, 2016. "The publicness of public transport: The changing nature of public transport in Latin American cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 176-183.
    6. Rouhani, Omid M. & Geddes, R. Richard & Gao, H. Oliver & Bel, Germà, 2016. "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 86-103.
    7. Euijune Kim & Yujin Bae, 2015. "Economic Contribution of the Private Sector on Financing and Operation of a Highway: Financial Computable General Equilibrium," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(3), pages 397-414, July.
    8. Antonio Estache & Ellis Juan & Lourdes Trujillo, 2011. "Public–Private Partnerships in Transport," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Lee, Eun Hak, 2024. "eXplainable DEA approach for evaluating performance of public transport origin-destination pairs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. NakHyeok Choi & Kyujin Jung, 2017. "Measuring Efficiency and Effectiveness of Highway Management in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Fabrice Hamelin & Vincent Spenlehauer, 2014. "Managing to Reinvent Strong Publicness in a Privatized World," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 419-438, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Eun Hak & Prozzi, Jolanda & Lewis, P. Grace Tee & Draper, Maia & Kim, Bumsik, 2025. "From scores to strategy: Performance-based transportation planning in Texas," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hussain, Shahid & Xuetong, Wang & Maqbool, Rashid & Hussain, Mustansar & Shahnawaz, Muhammad, 2022. "The influence of government support, organizational innovativeness and community participation in renewable energy project success: A case of Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    2. Fleta-Asín, Jorge & Muñoz, Fernando, 2020. "How does risk transference to private partner impact on public-private partnerships’ success? Empirical evidence from developing economies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Sylvester Ngome Chisika & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "Enhancing Sustainable Management of Public Natural Forests Through Public Private Partnerships in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Farhad Hossain & Anthony Sumnaya Kumasey & Derek Eldridge & Foteini Kravariti & Justice Nyigmah Bawole, 2018. "Paradox of public sector capacity building: Lessons from MATT2 UK–Bangladesh co‐operation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 689-702, October.
    5. Lindsey M. Bier & Candace L. White, 2021. "Cultural diplomacy as corporate strategy: an analysis of Pasona Group’s “New Tohoku” program in Japan," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 180-192, June.
    6. Metaxas, Theodore & Preza, Elisavet, 2012. "Public- Private Partnerships in Southeastern Europe: The case of Croatia," MPRA Paper 43830, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Zhang, Zumeng & Ding, Liping & Wang, Chaofan & Dai, Qiyao & Shi, Yin & Zhao, Yujia & Zhu, Yuxuan, 2022. "Do operation and maintenance contracts help photovoltaic poverty alleviation power stations perform better?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Adomako, Samuel & Shenkar, Oded & Liu, Xiaohui & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2024. "Editorial on Doing business in Africa: Navigating opportunities and challenges in Africa's emerging markets," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    9. Rouhani, Omid, 2021. "Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches- Version 2," MPRA Paper 105729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Yun, Hyunsoo & Lee, Eun Hak, 2025. "Party politics in transport policy with a large language model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 487-496.
    11. Peiwen Guo & Jun Fang & Ke Zhu, 2023. "The Spatial Spillover Effect and Function Routes of Transport Infrastructure Investment on Economic Growth: Evidence from Panel Data of OECD Members and Partners," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Idrissa Yaya Diandy & Alioune Badara Seck, 2021. "Infrastructures physiques et croissance économique en Afrique de l'Ouest: Le rôle des institutions," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 154-165, March.
    14. José María Agudo-Valiente & Pilar Gargallo-Valero & Manuel Salvador-Figueras, 2019. "Perceptions of Final Beneficiaries about the Performance of Cross-sector Partnerships: A Case Study Applied to the 2008 Zaragoza International Exhibition on Water and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Yunqiang Xue & Hongzhi Guan & Jonathan Corey & Heng Wei & Hai Yan, 2017. "Quantifying a Financially Sustainable Strategy of Public Transport: Private Capital Investment Considering Passenger Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Mario La Torre & Annarita Trotta & Helen Chiappini & Alessandro Rizzello, 2019. "Business Models for Sustainable Finance: The Case Study of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Yang, Dong & Li, Lu & Notteboom, Theo, 2022. "Chinese investment in overseas container terminals: The role of investor attributes in achieving a higher port competitiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 112-122.
    18. Kuldeep Kavta & Arkopal K. Goswami, 2021. "A methodological framework for a priori selection of travel demand management package using fuzzy MCDM methods," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3059-3084, December.
    19. Jacob, Jagan, 2020. "Should competing firms cooperate to reduce congestion?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.