IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v87y2023icp433-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the sentimental features of rumor messages and investors' intentions to invest

Author

Listed:
  • Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim
  • Sarsam, Samer Muthana
  • Al-Samarraie, Hosam
  • Alblehai, Fahad

Abstract

Investors' decisions to invest in stock markets can be significantly influenced by online rumors generated by certain companies or influencers. The current understanding of how certain sentimental features can help increase the prediction capabilities of online rumors is still in its fancy stage. This study explored the types of topics and emotions found in rumor messages and how they are associated with investors' decisions to invest in stocks. We also investigated the potential of using these emotions in predicting investors' intention to invest in stock markets. The sentimental features consisted of users' emotions (anger, fear, sadness, joy, and trust) and polarity (positive, negative, and neutral). A topic modeling approach was applied to identify logical associations between different sentimental features of rumors on Twitter. The results showed that rumors tweets associated with investors' intention to invest were linked to the joy and trust sentiments, while the anger and fear sentiments were linked to no intention to invest. The results showed that these emotions can be used in predicting the impact of online rumors on investors’ investment decisions. The prediction model can be useful for stock market prediction by enabling managers and researchers to analyze and assess the magnitudinal impact of rumors on certain investment decisions. The outcomes can also help decision and policy makers to take the required actions to prevent possible financial instability due to COVID-19 or other future events.

Suggested Citation

  • Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim & Sarsam, Samer Muthana & Al-Samarraie, Hosam & Alblehai, Fahad, 2023. "Exploring the sentimental features of rumor messages and investors' intentions to invest," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 433-444.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:87:y:2023:i:c:p:433-444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.05.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023001582
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.05.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Y. Yang & Sheung Yin Kevin Mo & Anqi Liu, 2015. "Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(10), pages 1637-1656, October.
    2. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Yingying Xu & Jichang Zhao, 2022. "Can sentiments on macroeconomic news explain stock returns? Evidence form social network data," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2073-2088, April.
    4. Samer Muthana Sarsam & Hosam Al-Samarraie, 2018. "A First Look at the Effectiveness of Personality Dimensions in Promoting Users’ Satisfaction With the System," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, April.
    5. Verma, Surabhi & Gustafsson, Anders, 2020. "Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 253-261.
    6. Halil Kiymaz, 2002. "The stock market rumours and stock prices: a test of price pressure and size effect in an emerging market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7), pages 469-474.
    7. Xia, Ling-Ling & Jiang, Guo-Ping & Song, Bo & Song, Yu-Rong, 2015. "Rumor spreading model considering hesitating mechanism in complex social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 295-303.
    8. Yingying Xu & Zhixin Liu & Jichang Zhao & Chiwei Su, 2017. "Weibo sentiments and stock return: A time-frequency view," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Han, Shuo & Zhuang, Fuzhen & He, Qing & Shi, Zhongzhi & Ao, Xiang, 2014. "Energy model for rumor propagation on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 99-109.
    10. Huang, Haifeng, 2017. "A War of (Mis)Information: The Political Effects of Rumors and Rumor Rebuttals in an Authoritarian Country," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 283-311, April.
    11. Shen, Yiran & Liu, Chang & Sun, Xiaolei & Guo, Kun, 2023. "Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk–return perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 395-408.
    12. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    13. Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Barnett, Julie & Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Sams, Steven, 2016. "Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Peng, 2019. "Heterogeneity, judgment, and social trust of agents in rumor spreading," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 447-461.
    2. Lu, Peng & Deng, Liping & Liao, Hongbing, 2019. "Conditional effects of individual judgment heterogeneity in information dissemination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 335-344.
    3. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Abhinav Kumar & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Attention-Based LSTM Network for Rumor Veracity Estimation of Tweets," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 459-474, April.
    4. Lu, Peng & Yao, Qi & Lu, Pengfei, 2019. "Two-stage predictions of evolutionary dynamics during the rumor dissemination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 349-369.
    5. Maia, Hugo P. & Ferreira, Silvio C. & Martins, Marcelo L., 2023. "Controversy-seeking fuels rumor-telling activity in polarized opinion networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Julia Cage & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2017. "The Production of Information in an Online World: Is Copy Right?," Working Papers hal-03393171, HAL.
    7. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    8. Tetsuro Kobayashi & Fumiaki Taka & Takahisa Suzuki, 2021. "Can “Googling” correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    10. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    11. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    14. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Kerim Peren Arin & Juan A. Lacomba & Francisco Lagos & Deni Mazrekaj & Marcel Thum, 2021. "Misperceptions and Fake News during the Covid-19 Pandemic," CESifo Working Paper Series 9066, CESifo.
    16. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Barrera, Oscar & Guriev, Sergei & Henry, Emeric & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2020. "Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Sumeet Kumar & Binxuan Huang & Ramon Alfonso Villa Cox & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "An anatomical comparison of fake-news and trusted-news sharing pattern on Twitter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 109-133, June.
    19. Julia Cagé & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2020. "The Production of Information in an Online World," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 87(5), pages 2126-2164.
    20. Zazli Lily Wisker & Robert Neil McKie, 2021. "The effect of fake news on anger and negative word-of-mouth: moderating roles of religiosity and conservatism," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(2), pages 144-153, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:87:y:2023:i:c:p:433-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.