IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v111y2016icp86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotopoulos, Panos
  • Barnett, Julie
  • Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee
  • Sams, Steven

Abstract

One of the main challenges of emergency management lies in communicating risks to the public. On some occasions, risk communicators might seek to increase awareness over emerging risks, while on others the aim might be to avoid escalation of public reactions. Social media accounts offer an opportunity to rapidly distribute critical information and in doing so to mitigate the impact of emergencies by influencing public reactions. This article draws on theories of risk and emergency communication in order to consider the impact of Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public. We analyse 10,020 Twitter messages posted by the official accounts of UK local government authorities (councils) in the context of two major emergencies: the heavy snow of December 2010 and the riots of August 2011. Twitter was used in a variety of ways to communicate and manage associated risks including messages to provide official updates, encourage protective behaviour, increase awareness and guide public attention to mitigating actions. We discuss the importance of social media as means of increasing confidence in emergency management institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Barnett, Julie & Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Sams, Steven, 2016. "Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516301196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach, 2012. "Use of microblogging for collective sense‐making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 34-47, January.
    2. Zulean, Marian & Prelipcean, Gabriela, 2013. "Emergency preparedness in Romania: Dynamics, shortcomings and policy proposals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(9), pages 1714-1724.
    3. Martin Lodge, 2009. "The Public Management of Risk: The Case for Deliberating among Worldviews," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(4), pages 395-408, July.
    4. Cynthia Chew & Gunther Eysenbach, 2010. "Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Laura N. Rickard & Katherine A. McComas & Christopher E. Clarke & Richard C. Stedman & Daniel J. Decker, 2013. "Exploring risk attenuation and crisis communication after a plague death in Grand Canyon," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 145-167, February.
    6. Denis Smith & Brian Toft, 1998. "Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector: Editorial: Issues in Public Sector Risk Management," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 7-10, October.
    7. Denis Smith & Jo McCloskey, 1998. "Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector: Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Public Sector Risk," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 41-50, October.
    8. Cécile Wendling & Jack Radisch & Stephane Jacobzone, 2013. "The Use of Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 24, OECD Publishing.
    9. Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach, 2012. "Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 34-47, January.
    10. Dorasamy, Magiswary & Raman, Murali & Kaliannan, Maniam, 2013. "Knowledge management systems in support of disasters management: A two decade review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(9), pages 1834-1853.
    11. Turoff, Murray & Hiltz, Starr Roxanne & Bañuls, Víctor A. & Van Den Eede, Gerd, 2013. "Multiple perspectives on planning for emergencies: An introduction to the special issue on planning and foresight for emergency preparedness and management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(9), pages 1647-1656.
    12. William J. Burns & Paul Slovic & Roger E. Kasperson & Jeanne X. Kasperson & Ortwin Renn & Srinivas Emani, 1993. "Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(6), pages 611-623, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Abhinav Kumar & Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor, 2019. "Event classification and location prediction from tweets during disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 737-757, December.
    2. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Gaspar, Rui & Yan, Zheng & Domingos, Samuel, 2019. "Extreme natural and man-made events and human adaptive responses mediated by information and communication technologies' use: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 125-135.
    4. Christopher D. Wirz & Michael A. Xenos & Dominique Brossard & Dietram Scheufele & Jennifer H. Chung & Luisa Massarani, 2018. "Rethinking Social Amplification of Risk: Social Media and Zika in Three Languages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2599-2624, December.
    5. Kathrin Eismann, 2021. "Diffusion and persistence of false rumors in social media networks: implications of searchability on rumor self-correction on Twitter," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1299-1329, November.
    6. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Robert Hebdon, 2020. "Tweeting and Retweeting for Fight for $15: Unions as Dinosaur Opinion Leaders?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 301-335, June.
    7. Stan Karanasios & Aljona Zorina, 2023. "From participation roles to socio‐emotional information roles: Insights from the closure of an online community," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 33-49, January.
    8. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2019. "Influence of New Public Management Philosophy On Risk Management, Fraud and Corruption Control and Internal Audit: Evidence from an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 486-508, December.
    9. Robert Fabac & Davor Djalog & Vinko Zebic, 2015. "Organizing for Emergencies - Issues in Wildfire Fighting in Croatia," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 13(1), pages 99-116.
    10. Li, Xianghua & Wang, Zhen & Gao, Chao & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Reasoning human emotional responses from large-scale social and public media," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 182-193.
    11. Monika Meltzer & Lucrina Ștefănescu & Alexandru Ozunu, 2018. "Keep Them Engaged: Romanian County Inspectorates for Emergency Situations’ Facebook Usage for Disaster Risk Communication and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Jaebong Son & Jintae Lee & Kai R. Larsen & Jiyoung Woo, 2020. "Understanding the uncertainty of disaster tweets and its effect on retweeting: The perspectives of uncertainty reduction theory and information entropy," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1145-1161, October.
    13. Lobb, Alexandra E., 2004. "A Methodological Review of the Impacts of Risk and Trust on Consumer Behaviour Towards Food Safety," 84th Seminar, February 8-11, 2004, Zeist, The Netherlands 24994, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Jennifer Fromm & Kaan Eyilmez & Melina Baßfeld & Tim A. Majchrzak & Stefan Stieglitz, 2023. "Social Media Data in an Augmented Reality System for Situation Awareness Support in Emergency Control Rooms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 303-326, February.
    15. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    16. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Ortwin Renn & Andreas Klinke, 2013. "A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Shuolin Geng & Qi Zhou & Mingjie Li & Dianxing Song & Yanjun Wen, 2021. "Spatial–temporal differences in disaster perception and response among new media users and the influence factors: a case study of the Shouguang Flood in Shandong province," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 2241-2262, January.
    19. Anatolii N. Balashov & Andrii M. Lyseiuk & Ivan I. Bashta & Anastasiia D. Shtelmashenko & Andrii V. Mykoliuk, 2020. "Risks of Social Communications of Public Administrative Bodies with Regard to Manifestations of Corruption," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 9, November.
    20. J. A. Giesecke & W. J. Burns & A. Barrett & E. Bayrak & A. Rose & P. Slovic & M. Suher, 2012. "Assessment of the Regional Economic Impacts of Catastrophic Events: CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of an RDD Attack Scenario," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 583-600, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.