IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v18y2019i4p486-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of New Public Management Philosophy On Risk Management, Fraud and Corruption Control and Internal Audit: Evidence from an Australian Public Sector Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Anup Chowdhury
  • Nikhil Chandra Shil

    (East West University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Research Question: This study will explore how private sector financial management technologies (specifically, risk management system, fraud and corruption control system and internal audit) become embedded in a selected public sector organisation. Motivation: The motivation for this study is to explore how private sector financial management control tools contributed to and shaped new organisational culture within the public sector organisation. Idea: The idea was generated from the philosophy of New Public Management which was based on the premise that using the private sector tools, the public sector would be efficient and at the same time effectiveness would be improved (Chowdhury and Shil, 2017). Data: Qualitative research approach was adopted and data was collected in the case study tradition. Twenty top, mid and junior level executives from a selected Government Department in the Australian Capital Territory were interviewed (Chowdhury and Shil, 2016). Tools: The main data sources were interviews and archival official documents. Another tool used was direct observation which helped researchers to support the archival documents and interview data. Data were analyzed using the approach provided by Miles and Huberman (1994). Findings: Findings of the study revealed that strategic risk management is a part of the business planning life cycle of the researched Department and business units review their strategic risks as part of their business planning process. In the Department it is evident that fraud and corruption control system is a part of their cultural environment. The Department has established an independent Internal Audit and Review Unit, who provides service to management to meet all prescribed statutory responsibilities within a performance improvement environment. Contribution: The findings of the present study are expected to increase our understanding about the private sector control devices used in a public sector context and this study will be of value to the academic researchers and practitioners. The study may be useful to the policy makers also who are engaged in formulating new public sector policies. Moreover, the findings reported on this study would be useful to the public sector managers in their day to day decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2019. "Influence of New Public Management Philosophy On Risk Management, Fraud and Corruption Control and Internal Audit: Evidence from an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 486-508, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:486-508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/18_4_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Drogalas & Michail Pazarskis & Evgenia Anagnostopoulou & Angeliki Papachristou, 2017. "The Effect of Internal Audit Effectiveness, Auditor Responsibility and Training in Fraud Detection," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 434-454, December.
    2. Tobias Johansson & Sven Siverbo & Carolina Camén, 2016. "Managing cooperation, coordination, and legitimacy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1012-1037, August.
    3. Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Jian & Zhou, Nan, 2007. "Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 300-327.
    4. Denis Smith & Brian Toft, 1998. "Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector: Editorial: Issues in Public Sector Risk Management," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 7-10, October.
    5. Stephen P. Osborne & Louise Brown, 2011. "Innovation in public services: engaging with risk," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 4-6, January.
    6. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2017. "Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Denis Smith & Jo McCloskey, 1998. "Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector: Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Public Sector Risk," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 41-50, October.
    8. Helen Irvine & Michael Gaffikin, 2006. "Getting in, getting on and getting out: reflections on a qualitative research project," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 115-145, January.
    9. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2017. "Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2016. "Innovation in Public Sector Management Control Systems in the Context of New Public Management: A Case of an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 99-125.
    11. Joe Christopher & Gerrit Sarens & Philomena Leung, 2009. "A critical analysis of the independence of the internal audit function: evidence from Australia," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 200-220, January.
    12. Hoque, Zahirul, 2005. "Securing institutional legitimacy or organizational effectiveness? A case examining the impact of public sector reform initiatives in an Australian local authority," Working Papers aef_2005_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monia Castellini & Caterina Ferrario & Vincenzo Riso, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Risk Management: An overview of Italian municipalities," Working Papers 20210310, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    2. Osama Samih Shaban & Abdallah Izzat Barakat, 2023. "Evaluation of Internal Audit Standards as a Foundation for Carrying out and Promoting a Wide Variety of Value-Added Tasks-Evidence from Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lobb, Alexandra E., 2004. "A Methodological Review of the Impacts of Risk and Trust on Consumer Behaviour Towards Food Safety," 84th Seminar, February 8-11, 2004, Zeist, The Netherlands 24994, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Barnett, Julie & Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Sams, Steven, 2016. "Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-96.
    3. Marko Šostar & Vladimir Ristanović, 2023. "Assessment of Influencing Factors on Consumer Behavior Using the AHP Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Alzeban, Abdulaziz & Sawan, Nedal, 2015. "The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 61-71.
    5. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2016. "Innovation in Public Sector Management Control Systems in the Context of New Public Management: A Case of an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 99-125.
    6. Chen, Tao, 2023. "Common auditors and internal control similarity: Evidence from China," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    7. Curtis E. Clements & Ryan K. Jessup & John D. Neill & Paul Wertheim, 2018. "The relationship between director tenure and director quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 142-161, August.
    8. Jun Guo & Pinghsun Huang & Yan Zhang, 2019. "Do debt covenant violations serve as a risk factor of ineffective internal control?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 231-251, January.
    9. Glenn Boyle & Xu (Jane) Ji, 2011. "New Zealand Corporate Boards in Transition: Composition, Activity and Incentives Between 1995 and 2010," Working Papers in Economics 11/36, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    10. Hamza Mohammad Alqudah & Noor Afza Amran & Haslinda Hassan, 2019. "Extrinsic Factors Influencing Internal Auditors’ Effectiveness in Jordanian Public Sector," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-67, December.
    11. Hooghiemstra, Reggy & Hermes, Niels & Oxelheim, Lars & Randøy, Trond, 2019. "Strangers on the board: The impact of board internationalization on earnings management of Nordic firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 119-134.
    12. Yahya Ali Al-Matari & Sallahuddin Hassan & Hassan Alaaraj, 2016. "Application of Basel Committee's New Standards of Internal Audit Function: A Road Map towards Banks' Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 1014-1018.
    13. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:51-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Philip Law, 2011. "Corporate governance and no fraud occurrence in organizations: Hong Kong evidence," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(6), pages 501-518, June.
    15. Deng, Kebin & Hu, Fang & Tian, Gary Gang & Zhong, Ziying, 2022. "Does the disclosure of internal control deficiency matter for accrual quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    16. Enrico Bracci, 2013. "Inter-Organizational Accountability and Budget Cut-Backs," Working Papers 2013152, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    17. Zvi Singer & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Do companies try to conceal financial misstatements through auditor shopping?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 140-180, January.
    18. Achraf Guidara & Imen Achek & Saida Dammak, 2016. "Internal Control Weaknesses, Family Ownership and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from the Tunisian Stock Exchange," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 148-166, May.
    19. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili, 2017. "Audit committee characteristics and audit fees: Evidence from France [Caractéristiques du comité d’audit et honoraires d’audit : cas des entreprises françaises]," Post-Print hal-01907594, HAL.
    20. Florackis, Chris & Sainani, Sushil, 2021. "Can CFOs resist undue pressure from CEOs to manage earnings?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    21. Erlane K. Ghani* & Mazni Zulkifli & Rahayu Abdul Rahman, 2019. "Factors Influencing Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in Malaysian Property Companies," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 559-568, 02-2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    new public management; risk management; fraud and corruption control; internal audit; public sector; Australia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:486-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.