IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v80y2020ics073988592030007x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of port community systems (PCS) characteristics on performance

Author

Listed:
  • Caldeirinha, Vítor
  • Felício, J. Augusto
  • Salvador, Antónia Sena
  • Nabais, João
  • Pinho, Tiago

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of the port community system (PCS) and its influence on port performance. The techniques of principal component analysis and structural equation modelling are applied to 153 valid responses from a sample, obtained from Portuguese port community experts. The results identify and measure the factors that characterize the PCS and affects port performance. PCS characteristic, including service level, partner network, ship services, cargo services, logistics services and advanced services, affect port performance, defined as operational performance, effectiveness and efficiency. The primary contribution of this study is to show the mechanisms that allow ports to adjust and evolve the PCS characteristics and develop new features that affect port performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Caldeirinha, Vítor & Felício, J. Augusto & Salvador, Antónia Sena & Nabais, João & Pinho, Tiago, 2020. "The impact of port community systems (PCS) characteristics on performance," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s073988592030007x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988592030007X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Meersman & E. Van De Voorde & T. Vanelslander, 2010. "Port Competition Revisited," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 55(2), pages 210-233, June.
    2. Jeffrey Martin & Brian J. Thomas, 2001. "The container terminal community," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 279-292, July.
    3. Valentin Carlan & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander & Athena Roumboutsos, 2017. "Digital innovation in the port sector," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(1-2), pages 71-93, March.
    4. Leonard Heilig & Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 227-254, December.
    5. Pierluigi Zerbino & Davide Aloini & Riccardo Dulmin & Valeria Mininno, 2019. "Towards Analytics-Enabled Efficiency Improvements in Maritime Transportation: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Bichou, K. & Gray, R., 2005. "A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 75-92, January.
    7. H. Meersman & E. Van De Voorde & T. Vanelslander, 2010. "Port Competition Revisited," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 0(2), pages 210-233, June.
    8. Yusuf Volkan Aydogdu & Selim Aksoy, 2015. "A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Laurent Fedi & Alexandre Lavissière & Dawn Russel & David Swanson, 2019. "The facilitating role of IT systems for legal compliance: the case of Port Community Systems and container Verified Gross Mass (VGM)," Post-Print hal-02062142, HAL.
    10. Claudia DURAN & Felisa CORDOVA, 2012. "Conceptual Analysis for the Strategic and Operational Knowledge Man-agement of a Port Community," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(2), pages 35-44.
    11. Theo E. Notteboom & Willy Winkelmans, 2001. "Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 71-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Yang & Liu, Qing & Chang, Chia-Hsun, 2023. "China-Europe freight transportation under the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic and government restriction measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Edvard Tijan & Marija Jović & Ana Panjako & Dražen Žgaljić, 2021. "The Role of Port Authority in Port Governance and Port Community System Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moros-Daza, Adriana & Amaya-Mier, René & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos, 2020. "Port Community Systems: A structured literature review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 27-46.
    2. Vairetti, Carla & González-Ramírez, Rosa G. & Maldonado, Sebastián & Álvarez, Claudio & Voβ, Stefan, 2019. "Facilitating conditions for successful adoption of inter-organizational information systems in seaports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 333-350.
    3. Balliauw, Matteo & Kort, Peter M. & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Capacity investment decisions of two competing ports under uncertainty: A strategic real options approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 249-264.
    4. Martínez-Pardo, Ana & Orro, Alfonso & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2020. "Analysis of port choice: A methodological proposal adjusted with public data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-193.
    5. Notteboom, Theo, 2006. "Chapter 19 Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 437-455, January.
    6. Claudia Durán & Fredi Palominos & Raúl Carrasco & Eduardo Carrillo, 2021. "Influence of Strategic Interrelationships and Decision-Making in Chilean Port Networks on Their Degree of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Weihua Liu & Xinran Shen & Di Wang, 2020. "The impacts of dual overconfidence behavior and demand updating on the decisions of port service supply chain: a real case study from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 565-604, August.
    9. Caldeira dos Santos, Murillo & Pereira, Fábio Henrique, 2021. "Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Shahrzad Nikghadam & Kim F. Molkenboer & Lori Tavasszy & Jafar Rezaei, 2023. "Information sharing to mitigate delays in port: the case of the Port of Rotterdam," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 576-601, September.
    11. Meersman, Hilde & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2019. "Freight transport models: Ready to support transport policy of the future?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-101.
    12. Musso, Antonio & Piccioni, Cristiana & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2013. "Italian seaports' competition policies: Facts and figures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 198-209.
    13. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Chen, Zhangliang & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2019. "Spatial interaction effects on inland distribution of maritime flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-10.
    14. MEERSMAN, Hilde & VAN DE VOORDE, Eddy, 2014. "Port capacity extension. A trade-off between public investment and shipping companies' time losses," Working Papers 2014009, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    15. Adolf K Y Ng & Athanasios A Pallis, 2010. "Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2147-2167, September.
    16. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Brinker, Janosch & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2020. "The impact of an asymmetric allocation of power on the digitalization strategy of port logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 457-484, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    19. Katrien Storms & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander & Ruben Deuren, 2023. "Demurrage and detention: from operational challenges towards solutions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s073988592030007x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.