IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crnind/v23y2022i1p3-21.html

Simulation-Based Port Competition: Feasibility and Implementation of an Agent-Based Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Koen De Winne

Abstract

The objective of this article is to discuss the feasibility and implementation of an agent-based computational framework for game-theoretical port competition. There are many different determinants which influence the competitive position of a seaport at any time. And as a consequence of this complexity, simple calculations or solution methods are not possible. This article elaborates a generic and modular framework for modeling and simulating the competition between multiple, heterogeneous port players. First, the article briefly detects some elements that are useful and necessary to develop a meaningful agent-based framework. Priority elements are determined and it is considered which elements can be passed on to extensions of the framework. Second, some important aspects of the application of the agent-based methodology for the port sector are explained. Third, a limited number of examples of modules of the proof of concept are developed. Particular attention is paid to the modularity and extensibility of the agent-based framework in order to allow the users of the framework to fine-tune the choices in their simulation model. Finally, in a fourth part of this article, recommendations are formulated for the further development and enrichment of the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen De Winne, 2022. "Simulation-Based Port Competition: Feasibility and Implementation of an Agent-Based Framework," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:3-21
    DOI: 10.1177/17835917211064920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17835917211064920
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/17835917211064920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Hoffmann, Jan & Sanchez, Ricardo J., 2006. "The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 117-140, January.
    2. Werker, C. & Brenner, T., 2004. "Empirical calibration of simulation models," Working Papers 04.13, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    3. Matteo Balliauw & Hilde Meersman & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander, 2019. "Towards improved port capacity investment decisions under uncertainty: a real options approach," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 531-552, July.
    4. Schmutzler, Armin, 2013. "Competition and investment — A unified approach," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 477-487.
    5. H. Meersman & E. Van De Voorde & T. Vanelslander, 2010. "Port Competition Revisited," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 55(2), pages 210-233, June.
    6. Kirman, Alan P. & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2001. "Evolving market structure: An ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(3-4), pages 459-502, March.
    7. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Hans T.J. Smit, 2003. "Infrastructure Investment as a Real Options Game: The Case of European Airport Expansion," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 32(4), Winter.
    9. Scott Mathews & Vinay Datar & Blake Johnson, 2007. "A Practical Method for Valuing Real Options: The Boeing Approach," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 19(2), pages 95-104, March.
    10. Simone Caschili & Francesca Romana Medda, 2012. "A Review of the Maritime Container Shipping Industry as a Complex Adaptive System," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15.
    11. Kochanski, Tim, 2009. "An Agent Based Cournot Simulation with Innovation: Identifying the Determinants of Market Concentration," MPRA Paper 16539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Barry Zondag & Pietro Bucci & Padideh Gützkow & Gerard de Jong, 2010. "Port competition modeling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 179-194, May.
    13. Ishii, Masahiro & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo & Tezuka, Koichiro & Chang, Young-Tae, 2013. "A game theoretical analysis of port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 92-106.
    14. Soraya Hidalgo-Gallego & Ramón Núñez-Sánchez & Pablo Coto-Millán, 2017. "Game Theory And Port Economics: A Survey Of Recent Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 854-877, July.
    15. H. Meersman & E. Van De Voorde & T. Vanelslander, 2010. "Port Competition Revisited," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 0(2), pages 210-233, June.
    16. Christopher M. Anderson & Yong-An Park & Young-Tae Chang & Chang-Ho Yang & Tae-Woo Lee & Meifeng Luo, 2008. "A game-theoretic analysis of competition among container port hubs: the case of Busan and Shanghai 1," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 5-26, February.
    17. Fernando Vega-Redondo, 1997. "The Evolution of Walrasian Behavior," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 375-384, March.
    18. Trigeorgis, Lenos, 1991. "A Log-Transformed Binomial Numerical Analysis Method for Valuing Complex Multi-Option Investments," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 309-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balliauw, Matteo, 2021. "From theoretical real options models to pragmatic decision making: Required steps, opportunities and threats," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Balliauw, Matteo & Kort, Peter M. & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Capacity investment decisions of two competing ports under uncertainty: A strategic real options approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 249-264.
    3. Wang, Junjin & He, Fan & Chen, Mengdi & Liu, Jingling, 2025. "A review of game theory to maritime supply chain: A competitive and cooperative perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 364-378.
    4. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Martínez-Pardo, Ana & Orro, Alfonso & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2020. "Analysis of port choice: A methodological proposal adjusted with public data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-193.
    6. Xu, Lili & Yin, Yuntong & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2025. "Horizontal port integrations under mixed ownership," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Twrdy, Elen & Batista, Milan, 2016. "Modeling of container throughput in Northern Adriatic ports over the period 1990–2013," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 131-142.
    8. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    9. Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: Model and algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-51.
    10. Yuen, Andrew Chi-lok & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2013. "Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 220-231.
    11. Zheng, Shiyuan & Luo, Meifeng, 2021. "Competition or cooperation? Ports’ strategies and welfare analysis facing shipping alliances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Sheng, Dian & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen & Gillen, David, 2017. "Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 99-114.
    13. Shiyuan Zheng & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Terminal investment timing decisions in a competitive setting with uncertainty using a real option approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 392-411, April.
    14. Marta K. Kołacz & Katrien Storms & Christa Sys & Wouter Verheyen, 2024. "Economic and legal impacts of delayed containers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, December.
    15. Meersman, Hilde & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2019. "Freight transport models: Ready to support transport policy of the future?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-101.
    16. Song, Dong-Ping & Lyons, Andrew & Li, Dong & Sharifi, Hossein, 2016. "Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-96.
    17. Gang Dong & Dandan Zhong, 2019. "Tacit Collusion of Pricing Strategy Game between Regional Ports: The Case of Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Sheu, Jiuh Biing & Kundu, Tanmoy, 2018. "Forecasting time-varying logistics distribution flows in the One Belt-One Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 5-22.
    19. Wan, Yulai & Basso, Leonardo J. & Zhang, Anming, 2016. "Strategic investments in accessibility under port competition and inter-regional coordination," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 102-125.
    20. Marie Cryns & Edwin Hassel & Thierry Vanelslander, 2025. "Stakeholder identification and mapping in peripheral European inland waterway ecosystems," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.