IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v110y2025ics0739885925000228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced navigational insights and their impact on driver route choice: A hybrid utility-regret analysis with heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wenhao
  • An, Qinhe
  • Ji, Yanjie

Abstract

Active Traffic Management systems provide traffic information to drivers, guiding their route selections to help ease congestion. Given the high reliance of most drivers on navigation, the effectiveness of how this information is displayed is crucial. This study considers the timing of information dissemination and display format attributes and explores the interaction effects between individual characteristics and travel traits. A survey involving 831 participants, consisting of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference data, is conducted in Nanjing, China. Using a mixed latent class model, the population is categorized into different classes based on their decision-making rules, while incorporating unobserved heterogeneity within segment-level models. We consider both Random Utility and Random Regret theories. Our study reveals that there are significant differences in route choice behavior influenced by demographic factors, with younger, higher-income, and frequent drivers favoring utility-maximizing decisions, and older, lower-income individuals opting for choices that minimize regret. Variations in adherence are observed when information is presented before, during, or towards the end of the journey. Excessively complex information may increase decision-making pressure on drivers. The parameter estimations are also conducted trade-off analysis across various exogenous variables. The findings inform the improvement of navigation applications, personalized route recommendations, and congestion pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wenhao & An, Qinhe & Ji, Yanjie, 2025. "Enhanced navigational insights and their impact on driver route choice: A hybrid utility-regret analysis with heterogeneity," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000228
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Button & Rui Neiva, 2014. "Economic Efficiency of European Air Traffic Control Systems," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 48(1), pages 65-80, January.
    2. Lei Han & Zhigang Du & Shoushuo Wang & Ying Chen, 2022. "Analysis of Traffic Signs Information Volume Affecting Driver’s Visual Characteristics and Driving Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Schaller, Bruce, 2010. "New York City's congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 266-273, August.
    4. Guohui Zhang & Zhong Wang & Khali Persad & C. Walton, 2014. "Enhanced traffic information dissemination to facilitate toll road utilization: a nested logit model of a stated preference survey in Texas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 231-249, March.
    5. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2003. "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 681-698, September.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0208309 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Stephane Hess & Amanda Stathopoulos & Andrew Daly, 2012. "Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: an approach and four case studies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 565-591, May.
    8. Joydip Majumder & Lina Kattan & Khandkar Nurul Habib & Tak Shing Fung, 2013. "Modelling traveller response to variable message sign," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 259-280, July.
    9. Fosgerau, Mogens & Frejinger, Emma & Karlstrom, Anders, 2013. "A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 70-80.
    10. Alessandro Vacca & Carlo Giacomo Prato & Italo Meloni, 2019. "Should I stay or should I go? Investigating route switching behavior from revealed preferences data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 75-93, February.
    11. Melvin Wong & Bilal Farooq, 2019. "ResLogit: A residual neural network logit model for data-driven choice modelling," Papers 1912.10058, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    12. Wenhao Li & Chengkun Liu & Tao Wang & Yanjie Ji, 2024. "An innovative supervised learning structure for trajectory reconstruction of sparse LPR data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 73-97, February.
    13. Melo, Sandra & Macedo, Joaquim & Baptista, Patrícia, 2017. "Guiding cities to pursue a smart mobility paradigm: An example from vehicle routing guidance and its traffic and operational effects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 24-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arriagada, Jacqueline & Prato, Carlo & Munizaga, Marcela, 2025. "Incorporating the inertia effect into a route choice model using fare transaction data from a large-scale public transport network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Caspar G Chorus, 2018. "Paving the way towards superstar destinations: Models of convex demand for quality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 161-179, January.
    3. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    4. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2018. "Hypothetical bias and decision-rule effect in modelling discrete directional choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 361-388.
    5. Damien Jourdain1,2,3 & Juliette Lairez4,5 & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 417-437.
    6. Damien Jourdain & Juliette Lairez & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Post-Print hal-02995632, HAL.
    7. Carlo Giacomo Prato & Katrín Halldórsdóttir & Otto Anker Nielsen, 2017. "Latent lifestyle and mode choice decisions when travelling short distances," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1343-1363, November.
    8. Thiene, Mara & Scarpa, Riccardo & Longo, Alberto & Hutchinson, William George, 2018. "Types of front of pack food labels: Do obese consumers care? Evidence from Northern Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 84-102.
    9. Gonzalez-Valdes, Felipe & Heydecker, Benjamin G. & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2022. "Quantifying behavioural difference in latent class models to assess empirical identifiability: Analytical development and application to multiple heuristics," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    10. David A. J. Meester & Stephane Hess & John Buckell & Thomas O. Hancock, 2023. "Can decision field theory enhance our understanding of health‐based choices? Evidence from risky health behaviors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1710-1732, August.
    11. Stephane Hess, 2014. "Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 14, pages 311-330, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Thiene, Mara & Scarpa, Riccardo & Longo, Alberto & Hutchinson, George, "undated". "Front of Pack Food Labels and dietary choice determinants: what works and for whom?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 261225, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. David Hensher & Andrew Collins & William Greene, 2013. "Accounting for attribute non-attendance and common-metric aggregation in a probabilistic decision process mixed multinomial logit model: a warning on potential confounding," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 1003-1020, September.
    14. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    15. Damien Jourdain & Juliette Lairez & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 417-437, December.
    16. Contu, Davide & Strazzera, Elisabetta, 2022. "Testing for saliency-led choice behavior in discrete choice modeling: An application in the context of preferences towards nuclear energy in Italy," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    17. Jourdain, Damien & Lairez, Juliette & Striffler, Bruno & Lundhede, Thomas, 2022. "A choice experiment approach to evaluate maize farmers’ decision-making processes in Lao PDR," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    18. Gonçalves, Tânia & Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Pinto, Lígia M. Costa, 2022. "The role of attribute non-attendance on consumer decision-making: Theoretical insights and empirical evidence," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 788-805.
    19. Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio, 2018. "Application of the Combination of Random Utility Models (CoRUM) to route choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 304-326.
    20. Smeele, Nicholas V.R. & Chorus, Caspar G. & Schermer, Maartje H.N. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2023. "Towards machine learning for moral choice analysis in health economics: A literature review and research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.