IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v103y2024ics0739885923001440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Sebastian
  • Saraceni, Adriana

Abstract

Drones are expected to allow faster and more efficient last mile parcel delivery while at the same time reducing relevant costs. This studies’ purpose is to understand what factors influence consumer acceptance in Germany. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model was expand using an incremental approach. The construct performance expectancy was replaced with the three context-specific constructs, environmental performance expectancy, speed expectancy, and relative advantage of contact-free delivery. Four perceived risk constructs (i.e., privacy risk, safety risk, noise risk, financial risk) were added. Eleven hypotheses were developed and tested via an online survey. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Relative advantage of contact-free delivery, hedonic motivation, and social influence are the highlights among the factors investigated for their influence on consumer acceptance. The influence on the perceived risk constructs privacy risk and safety risk varies depending on drone usage experience and gender. The value of the study stems from the proposed extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, tailored to a new technology context (drones for last mile parcel delivery) and a different cultural setting (Germany). This research contributes to the multidisciplinary approach of existing drone research by adding a consumer perspective to the mainly logistics provider-oriented engineering, informatics, and operations research.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0739885923001440
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923001440
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Min & Zhao, Lindu & Kong, Nan & Campy, Kathryn S. & Xu, Ge & Zhu, Guiju & Cao, Xianye & Wang, Song, 2020. "Understanding consumers’ behavior to adopt self-service parcel services for last-mile delivery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Joshuah K. Stolaroff & Constantine Samaras & Emma R. O’Neill & Alia Lubers & Alexandra S. Mitchell & Daniel Ceperley, 2018. "Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    5. John Gunnar Carlsson & Siyuan Song, 2018. "Coordinated Logistics with a Truck and a Drone," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4052-4069, September.
    6. Ann Melissa Campbell & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2005. "Decision Support for Consumer Direct Grocery Initiatives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 313-327, August.
    7. Brem, Alexander & Viardot, Eric & Nylund, Petra A., 2021. "Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Smith, Angela & Dickinson, Janet E. & Marsden, Greg & Cherrett, Tom & Oakey, Andrew & Grote, Matt, 2022. "Public acceptance of the use of drones for logistics: The state of play and moving towards more informed debate," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Post-Print hal-03741843, HAL.
    10. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Li, Yuyu & Shang, Jennifer & Urban, Timothy L., 2019. "Impact of drone delivery on sustainability and cost: Realizing the UAV potential through vehicle routing optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1164-1175.
    11. Reece A. Clothier & Dominique A. Greer & Duncan G. Greer & Amisha M. Mehta, 2015. "Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1167-1183, June.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Kwon, Heeyeul & Kim, Jieun & Park, Yongtae, 2017. "Applying LSA text mining technique in envisioning social impacts of emerging technologies: The case of drone technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 60, pages 15-28.
    14. Luppicini, Rocci & So, Arthur, 2016. "A technoethical review of commercial drone use in the context of governance, ethics, and privacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 109-119.
    15. Urvashi Tandon & Ravi Kiran & Ash N. Sah, 2018. "The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived risk on customer satisfaction in online shopping: an emerging economy case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 57-91, February.
    16. Chen, Shang-Yu, 2016. "Green helpfulness or fun? Influences of green perceived value on the green loyalty of users and non-users of public bikes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 149-159.
    17. Gohram Baloch & Fatma Gzara, 2020. "Strategic Network Design for Parcel Delivery with Drones Under Competition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 204-228, January.
    18. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    19. Merkert, Rico & Wong, Yale Z., 2020. "Emerging business models and implications for the transport ecosystem," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dwivedi, Rohita, 2021. "The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    21. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali & Daniel J. Graham & Alexander Barron & Mark Trompet, 2020. "Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 737-769, June.
    22. Iman Dayarian & Martin Savelsbergh & John-Paul Clarke, 2020. "Same-Day Delivery with Drone Resupply," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 229-249, January.
    23. Hwang, Jinsoo & Kim, Jinkyung Jenny & Lee, Kwang-Woo, 2021. "Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services: Its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    24. Lemardelé, Clément & Estrada, Miquel & Pagès, Laia & Bachofner, Mónika, 2021. "Potentialities of drones and ground autonomous delivery devices for last-mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    25. Tsai, Yao-Te & Tiwasing, Praewwanit, 2021. "Customers’ intention to adopt smart lockers in last-mile delivery service: A multi-theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    26. Joshuah K. Stolaroff & Constantine Samaras & Emma R. O’Neill & Alia Lubers & Alexandra S. Mitchell & Daniel Ceperley, 2018. "Author Correction: Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-1, December.
    27. Gerli, Paolo & Clement, Jessica & Esposito, Giovanni & Mora, Luca & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2022. "The hidden power of emotions: How psychological factors influence skill development in smart technology adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    28. Vakulenko, Yulia & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2018. "What's in the parcel locker? Exploring customer value in e-commerce last mile delivery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 421-427.
    29. Jeong, Ho Young & Song, Byung Duk & Lee, Seokcheon, 2019. "Truck-drone hybrid delivery routing: Payload-energy dependency and No-Fly zones," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 220-233.
    30. Yaprak, Ümit & Kılıç, Fatih & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2021. "Is the Covid-19 pandemic strong enough to change the online order delivery methods? Changes in the relationship between attitude and behavior towards order delivery by drone," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    31. Sara Reed & Ann Melissa Campbell & Barrett W. Thomas, 2022. "The Value of Autonomous Vehicles for Last-Mile Deliveries in Urban Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 280-299, January.
    32. Gursoy, Dogan & Chi, Oscar Hengxuan & Lu, Lu & Nunkoo, Robin, 2019. "Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 157-169.
    33. Hansson, Lisa, 2020. "Regulatory governance in emerging technologies: The case of autonomous vehicles in Sweden and Norway," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    34. Peppel, Marcel & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2022. "How will last-mile delivery be shaped in 2040? A Delphi-based scenario study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    2. Dukkanci, Okan & Campbell, James F. & Kara, Bahar Y., 2024. "Facility location decisions for drone delivery: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 397-418.
    3. ElSayed, Mo & Foda, Ahmed & Mohamed, Moataz, 2024. "The impact of civil airspace policies on the viability of adopting autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles in last-mile applications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 37-54.
    4. Sabino, Hullysses & Almeida, Rodrigo V.S. & Moraes, Lucas Baptista de & Silva, Walber Paschoal da & Guerra, Raphael & Malcher, Carlos & Passos, Diego & Passos, Fernanda G.O., 2022. "A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Amine Masmoudi, M. & Mancini, Simona & Baldacci, Roberto & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2022. "Vehicle routing problems with drones equipped with multi-package payload compartments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Chen, Tianyi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of technology-dependent shopping in the pandemic era: Integrating response efficacy and identity expressiveness into theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1053-1067.
    8. Hou, Wenjuan & Fang, Tao & Pei, Zhi & He, Qiao-Chu, 2021. "Integrated design of unmanned aerial mobility network: A data-driven risk-averse approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Yuen, Kum Fai & Cai, Lanhui & Wee, Shaun Chuin Kit & Wang, Xueqin, 2024. "Pandemic-driven acceptance of urban drone deliveries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 356-370.
    11. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Ljubica Radovanović, 2024. "Assessing Strategies to Overcome Barriers for Drone Usage in Last-Mile Logistics: A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Zhao, Lei & Bi, Xinhua & Li, Gendao & Dong, Zhaohui & Xiao, Ni & Zhao, Anni, 2022. "Robust traveling salesman problem with multiple drones: Parcel delivery under uncertain navigation environments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Prithvi Roy & Badrinarayan Srirangam Ramaprasad & Manan Chakraborty & Nandan Prabhu & Shreelatha Rao, 2024. "Customer Acceptance of Use of Artificial Intelligence in Hospitality Services: An Indian Hospitality Sector Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(3), pages 832-851, June.
    14. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Sun, Shanshan & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of self-service technology usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: The changing perceptions of ‘self’ and technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. van de Sanden, Stephanie & Willems, Kim & Brengman, Malaika, 2022. "How customers motive attributions impact intentions to use an interactive kiosk in-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Madani, Batool & Ndiaye, Malick & Salhi, Said, 2024. "Hybrid truck-drone delivery system with multi-visits and multi-launch and retrieval locations: Mathematical model and adaptive variable neighborhood search with neighborhood categorization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 100-125.
    17. Palm, Alvar, 2022. "Innovation systems for technology diffusion: An analytical framework and two case studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Sham, Rohana & Chong, Han Xi & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene & Bibi Tkm Thangal, Thahira & Abdamia, Noranita binti, 2023. "Switching up the delivery game: Understanding switching intention to retail drone delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Pahwa, Anmol & Jaller, Miguel, 2022. "A cost-based comparative analysis of different last-mile strategies for e-commerce delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Joonyup Eun & Byung Duk Song & Sangbok Lee & Dae-Eun Lim, 2019. "Mathematical Investigation on the Sustainability of UAV Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0739885923001440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.