IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v82y2018ip3p2993-3006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review

Author

Listed:
  • Choong, Yee Yaw
  • Chou, Kian Weng
  • Norli, Ismail

Abstract

The sustainable practice in the palm oil industry, which provides the global most demanded edible oil has a long way to be well developed. One of the most challenging problems is the management of palm oil mill effluent (POME). The current most applied treatment method of POME is anaerobic ponding system, which is not environmental friendly. This is because a large amount of the generated greenhouse gases is not captured, but escaped into the atmosphere. It is so critical to encourage the sustainable practice of closed anaerobic digestion system in the palm oil industry for utilizing POME to generate renewable biogas. For this, theoretical and technological studies of improving biogas production by POME anaerobic digestion are essential as the supporting research. Therefore, this paper will firstly discuss the influential factors of anaerobic digestion on the biogas production, then review the strategies which had been applied to improve the biogas production of POME anaerobic digestion. A lot of efforts have been made to emphasize on the co-digestion and biomass retention improvement within the digester. Other studied strategies include the POME pretreatment, additives supplementation, and bioreactor modification. By operating the anaerobic digester successfully, these applied strategies had positive response to the biogas production. However, the effectiveness of these strategies cannot be compared directly with each other, due to the different operating conditions. Overall, the studied strategies seem to be insufficient and lack of breakthrough.

Suggested Citation

  • Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:82:y:2018:i:p3:p:2993-3006
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211731403X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin, May Ji & Poh, Phaik Eong & Tey, Beng Ti & Chan, Eng Seng & Chin, Kit Ling, 2013. "Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME): Opportunities and challenges from Malaysia's perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 717-726.
    2. Gómez, X. & Cuetos, M.J. & Cara, J. & Morán, A. & García, A.I., 2006. "Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2017-2024.
    3. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    4. Loh, S.K. & Nasrin, A.B. & Mohamad Azri, S. & Nurul Adela, B. & Muzzammil, N. & Daryl Jay, T. & Stasha Eleanor, R.A. & Lim, W.S. & Choo, Y.M. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2017. "First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1257-1274.
    5. O-Thong, Sompong & Boe, Kanokwan & Angelidaki, Irini, 2012. "Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 648-654.
    6. Hagos, Kiros & Zong, Jianpeng & Li, Dongxue & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1485-1496.
    7. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    8. Hashim, Haslenda & Ho, Wai Shin, 2011. "Renewable energy policies and initiatives for a sustainable energy future in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4780-4787.
    9. Rasit, Nazaitulshila & Idris, Azni & Harun, Razif & Wan Ab Karim Ghani, Wan Azlina, 2015. "Effects of lipid inhibition on biogas production of anaerobic digestion from oily effluents and sludges: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 351-358.
    10. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    11. Yang, Liangcheng & Xu, Fuqing & Ge, Xumeng & Li, Yebo, 2015. "Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 824-834.
    12. Ahmed, Yunus & Yaakob, Zahira & Akhtar, Parul & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2015. "Production of biogas and performance evaluation of existing treatment processes in palm oil mill effluent (POME)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1260-1278.
    13. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2013. "Feasibility study of biogas production and utilization as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 454-462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. AM. Faizal & A. Amirah & Y. H. Tan, 2018. "Energy, Economic And Environmental Impact Of Waste-To-Energy In Malaysia," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 97-101, September.
    2. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun, 2019. "Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 507-522.
    4. Akhbari, Azam & Ibrahim, Shaliza & Ahmad, Muhammad Shakeel, 2023. "Feasibility of semi-pilot scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket fixed-film reactor for fermentative bio-hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 612-620.
    5. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Phuang, Zhen Xin & Woon, Kok Sin & Wong, Khai Jian & Liew, Peng Yen & Hanafiah, Marlia Mohd, 2021. "Unlocking the environmental hotspots of palm biodiesel upstream production in Malaysia via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Ahyahudin Sodri & Fentinur Evida Septriana, 2022. "Biogas Power Generation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    9. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah, 2020. "Multi-objective optimal design for integrated palm oil mill complex with consideration of effluent elimination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Gourich, Wail & Chan, Eng-Seng & Ng, Wei Zhe & Obon, Aaron Anthony & Maran, Kireshwen & Ong, Yi Hui & Lee, Chin Loong & Tan, Jully & Song, Cher Pin, 2022. "Life cycle benefits of enzymatic biodiesel co-produced in palm oil mills from sludge palm oil as renewable fuel for rural electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    11. Sharvini, S.R. & Noor, Z.Z. & Stringer, L.C. & Afionis, S. & Chong, C.S., 2022. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle cost-benefit analysis and policy insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Li, Xue & Mupondwa, Edmund, 2018. "Commercial feasibility of an integrated closed-loop ethanol-feedlot-biodigester system based on triticale feedstock in Canadian Prairies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 401-413.
    13. Adhirashree Vannarath & Arun Kumar Thalla, 2020. "Evaluation, ranking, and selection of pretreatment methods for the conversion of biomass to biogas using multi-criteria decision-making approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 510-525, December.
    14. Achmad Faqih & Roosganda Elizabeth & Delima Hasri Azahari, 2020. "The Increasing of Competitiveness of Agro-Industry Products Through Institutional Empowerment to Support the Achievement of Sustainable Agricultural Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 663-671.
    15. repec:zib:zjmerd:3jmerd2018-97-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. A Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & ElSergany, Moetaz & Anuar, Syed & Jorat, M. Ehsan & Yaacob, H. & Ahsan, Amimul & Imteaz, Monzur A. & Arifuzzaman,, 2020. "Recent advances on palm oil mill effluent (POME) pretreatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Park, Jeong-Woo & Heo, Juheon & Ly, Hoang Vu & Kim, Jinsoo & Lim, Hankwon & Kim, Seung-Soo, 2019. "Fast pyrolysis of acid-washed oil palm empty fruit bunch for bio-oil production in a bubbling fluidized-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 517-527.
    18. Muanruksa, Papasanee & Kaewkannetra, Pakawadee, 2020. "Combination of fatty acids extraction and enzymatic esterification for biodiesel production using sludge palm oil as a low-cost substrate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 901-906.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & ElSergany, Moetaz & Anuar, Syed & Jorat, M. Ehsan & Yaacob, H. & Ahsan, Amimul & Imteaz, Monzur A. & Arifuzzaman,, 2020. "Recent advances on palm oil mill effluent (POME) pretreatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun, 2019. "Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 507-522.
    3. Loh, S.K. & Nasrin, A.B. & Mohamad Azri, S. & Nurul Adela, B. & Muzzammil, N. & Daryl Jay, T. & Stasha Eleanor, R.A. & Lim, W.S. & Choo, Y.M. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2017. "First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1257-1274.
    4. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Fdez-Güelfo, L.A. & Zhou, Yan & Álvarez-Gallego, C.J. & Garcia, L.I. Romero & Ng, Wun Jern, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 380-399.
    9. Martínez-Ruano, Jimmy Anderson & Restrepo-Serna, Daissy Lorena & Carmona-Garcia, Estefanny & Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Poveda & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Effect of co-digestion of milk-whey and potato stem on heat and power generation using biogas as an energy vector: Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 504-518.
    10. Li, Xue & Mupondwa, Edmund, 2018. "Commercial feasibility of an integrated closed-loop ethanol-feedlot-biodigester system based on triticale feedstock in Canadian Prairies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 401-413.
    11. Muthita Tepsour & Nikannapas Usmanbaha & Thiwa Rattanaya & Rattana Jariyaboon & Sompong O-Thong & Poonsuk Prasertsan & Prawit Kongjan, 2019. "Biogas Production from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches and Palm Oil Decanter Cake using Solid-State Anaerobic co-Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Xiaojiao & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin, 2017. "Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 352-360.
    13. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    14. de Castro, Thiago Morais & Arantes, Eudes José & de Mendonça Costa, Mônica Sarolli Silva & Gotardo, Jackeline Tatiane & Passig, Fernando Hermes & de Carvalho, Karina Querne & Gomes, Simone Damasceno, 2021. "Anaerobic co-digestion of industrial waste landfill leachate and glycerin in a continuous anaerobic bioreactor with a fixed-structured bed (ABFSB): Effects of volumetric organic loading rate and alkal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1436-1446.
    15. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    16. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    17. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Siswo Sumardiono & Gebyar Adisukmo & Muthia Hanif & Budiyono Budiyono & Heri Cahyono, 2021. "Effects of Pretreatment and Ratio of Solid Sago Waste to Rumen on Biogas Production through Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.
    19. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    20. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:82:y:2018:i:p3:p:2993-3006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.