IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v227y2026ics1364032125011840.html

Carbon accounting: review and case study on the development of a carbon baseline for military infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Hicks, C.
  • Nakkasunchi, S.
  • Neild, A.
  • Heidrich, O.

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on the climate crisis, the impact of economic growth on carbon emissions, international treaties, environmental and carbon accounting, units of analysis, system boundaries, sectoral emissions, international standards and carbon accounting methodologies. There is a gap between carbon accounting guidance and practical implementations, which are often insufficiently systematic to provide true, fair and unbiased reporting. In military contexts the reporting of emissions is voluntary under the Paris Agreement, with most countries not reporting. Military expenditure is increasing faster than economic growth, increasing unreported GHGs, making it necessary to decouple emissions from economic growth and military expenditure. The UK is one of few countries to report military emissions, but based upon spending rather than more accurate process-based data collection, with limited Scope 3 measurement. A case study developed the first carbon baseline for infrastructure at a UK military base that utilized detailed process data using a systematic approach based upon international standards. This addressed the gap between guidance and practical implementations. RAF Leeming's Scope 1 and 2 emissions totalled 7,600t CO2e, with per capita emissions of 3.9tCO2e. Scope 3 emissions are estimated to be in the range 18,000 to 68,000 tCO2e, with total emissions in the approximate range 25,000 to 76,000 tCO2e. The case study enables the military to measure reductions in their emissions, facilitating risk management and decision-making to achieve carbon reduction targets. It also provides a template that could be employed at other military and industrial sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Hicks, C. & Nakkasunchi, S. & Neild, A. & Heidrich, O., 2026. "Carbon accounting: review and case study on the development of a carbon baseline for military infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:227:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125011840
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125011840
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freire-González, Jaume & Padilla Rosa, Emilio & Raymond, Josep Ll., 2024. "World economies’ progress in decoupling from CO₂ emissions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(1).
    2. Anna Christy & Marwa Elnahass & Jaime Amezaga & Anthony Browne & Oliver Heidrich, 2024. "A dynamic framework to align company climate reporting and action with global climate targets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3103-3128, May.
    3. Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar & Oliver Belcher & Stuart Parkinson & Benjamin Neimark & Doug Weir & Kirsti Ashworth & Reuben Larbi & Oliver Heidrich, 2022. "Decarbonize the military — mandate emissions reporting," Nature, Nature, vol. 611(7934), pages 29-32, November.
    4. Soumya Basu & Keiichi Ishihara, 2025. "On the resiliency of post-crisis decoupling in higher-order economy-energy-environment nexus in high-inflation developing economies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 657-719, April.
    5. Waltho, Cynthia & Elhedhli, Samir & Gzara, Fatma, 2019. "Green supply chain network design: A review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 305-318.
    6. Binh Bui & Carolyn J. Fowler, 2019. "Strategic Responses to Changing Climate Change Policies: The Role Played by Carbon Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 360-375, June.
    7. Cellura, Maurizio & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2011. "Sensitivity analysis to quantify uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessment: The case study of an Italian tile," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4697-4705.
    8. Roger L. Burritt & Tobias Hahn & STefan Schaltegger, 2002. "Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting — Links Between Business Actors and Environmental Management Accounting Tools," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(27), pages 39-50, July.
    9. David I. Stern, 2017. "The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 7-28, April.
    10. Gustavsson, Leif & Karjalainen, Timo & Marland, Gregg & Savolainen, Ilkka & Schlamadinger, Bernard & Apps, Mike, 2000. "Project-based greenhouse-gas accounting: guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(13), pages 935-946, November.
    11. Kennedy, Scott & Sgouridis, Sgouris, 2011. "Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5259-5268, September.
    12. Bertolini, Marina & Duttilo, Pierdomenico & Lisi, Francesco, 2025. "Accounting carbon emissions from electricity generation: A review and comparison of emission factor-based methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    13. J. C. Minx & T. Wiedmann & R. Wood & G. P. Peters & M. Lenzen & A. Owen & K. Scott & J. Barrett & K. Hubacek & G. Baiocchi & A. Paul & E. Dawkins & J. Briggs & D. Guan & S. Suh & F. Ackerman, 2009. "Input-Output Analysis And Carbon Footprinting: An Overview Of Applications," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 187-216.
    14. Katrina Lintukangas & Heli Arminen & Anni-Kaisa Kähkönen & Elina Karttunen, 2023. "Determinants of Supply Chain Engagement in Carbon Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 87-104, August.
    15. Yanjie Zhou & Gyu M. Lee, 2017. "A Lagrangian Relaxation-Based Solution Method for a Green Vehicle Routing Problem to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Huang, Hui-Fen & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2011. "Review and classify the GHGs-related indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 594-602, January.
    17. Pan, Wei & Li, Kaijian & Teng, Yue, 2018. "Rethinking system boundaries of the life cycle carbon emissions of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 379-390.
    18. Amy Luers & Leehi Yona & Christopher B. Field & Robert B. Jackson & Katharine J. Mach & Benjamin W. Cashore & Cynthia Elliott & Lauren Gifford & Colleen Honigsberg & Lena Klaassen & H. Damon Matthews , 2022. "Make greenhouse-gas accounting reliable — build interoperable systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 607(7920), pages 653-656, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Dosi & Federico Riccio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2025. "The Environmental Smile Curve: Input-Output evidence on the Pollution Haven Hypothesis," LEM Papers Series 2025/35, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    2. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    3. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2021. "Sustainable development and financial institutions: Do banks' environmental policies influence customer deposits?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 643-656, January.
    4. Peter Rafaj & Markus Amann, 2018. "Decomposing Air Pollutant Emissions in Asia: Determinants and Projections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Sumit Maheshwari & Chandra K. Jaggi & Prerna Gautam, 2026. "A state-of-the-art review of green supply chain management: observations and business insights," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(1), pages 193-273, March.
    6. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood, 2014. "Convergence Between The Eora, Wiod, Exiobase, And Openeu'S Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, September.
    7. Li, Yilin & Chen, Bin & Li, Chaohui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    9. Malerba, Daniele, 2020. "Poverty alleviation and local environmental degradation: An empirical analysis in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Badunenko, Oleg & Galeotti, Marzio & Hunt, Lester C., "undated". "Better to grow or better to improve? Measuring environmental efficiency in OECD countries with a Stochastic Environmental Kuznets Frontier," FEEM Working Papers 316226, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Wei Liu & Guohao Fan & Zixuan Liu, 2024. "Driving Factors in Carbon Emission Reduction in Prefabricated Building Supply Chains Based on Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Huang, Liqiao & Long, Yin & Chen, Jundong & Yoshida, Yoshikuni, 2023. "Sustainable lifestyle: Urban household carbon footprint accounting and policy implications for lifestyle-based decarbonization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    13. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.
    14. Becchio, Cristina & Bottero, Marta Carla & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Dell’Anna, Federico, 2018. "Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 803-817.
    15. Hussein Moghaddam & Robert M. Kunst, 2023. "The Role of Natural Gas in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Major Gas-Producing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Róbert Csalódi & Tímea Czvetkó & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of Energy Transition Paths and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Govindan, Kannan & Salehian, Farhad & Kian, Hadi & Hosseini, Seyed Teimoor & Mina, Hassan, 2023. "A location-inventory-routing problem to design a circular closed-loop supply chain network with carbon tax policy for achieving circular economy: An augmented epsilon-constraint approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    18. Ubaldo Comite & Alba Maria Gallo & Francesco Albergo & Valentina Beretta, 2025. "Accounting for Climate Change: A Temporal Analysis of the Literature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8213-8236, November.
    19. Thomas Beaussier & Sylvain Caurla & Véronique Bellon Maurel & Eléonore Loiseau, 2019. "Coupling economic models and environmental assessment methods to support regional policies : A critical review," Post-Print hal-02021423, HAL.
    20. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:227:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125011840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.