IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v158y2022ics136403212200079x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow

Author

Listed:
  • Niebuhr, C.M.
  • Schmidt, S.
  • van Dijk, M.
  • Smith, L.
  • Neary, V.S.

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics is employed for detailed prediction of the hydrokinetic turbine performance and wake modelling. Of these, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models are most widely used due to their ability to resolve power performance and detailed flow features at relatively low computational costs and acceptable accuracy. The limitations of these models are often not well understood when applied to complex turbine and wake dynamics which could lead to potential inaccurate and inappropriate conclusions. This paper focuses on the prediction of the wake generation, dissipation and flow recovery using commercially available modelling software. The approach and findings of previous numerical investigations on this matter are reviewed and compared to experimental measurements reported for a dual-rotor reference turbine. The shortcomings of these models are discussed and appropriate modelling techniques for the preliminary design or analysis of hydrokinetic turbines and inland energy generation schemes are identified. Commercially available RANS models show a good correlation of turbine performance. However, prediction of the wake behaviour is improved by using a virtual disk model with the blade element momentum theory, employing Reynolds stress closure models. These models allow for modelling the anisotropic conditions in the wake unlike the more popular eddy viscosity models. In addition, simplified rotor geometry models using blade element momentum theory are found to adequately model wake development and dissipation at a modest computational expense. The shortcomings of other approaches in terms of wake dissipation prediction and the effect of boundary and inflow conditions are analysed, emphasizing the importance of correct prescriptions of model parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Niebuhr, C.M. & Schmidt, S. & van Dijk, M. & Smith, L. & Neary, V.S., 2022. "A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s136403212200079x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212200079X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Masters & Alison Williams & T. Nick Croft & Michael Togneri & Matt Edmunds & Enayatollah Zangiabadi & Iain Fairley & Harshinie Karunarathna, 2015. "A Comparison of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Tidal Stream Turbine Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Malki, Rami & Masters, Ian & Williams, Alison J. & Nick Croft, T., 2014. "Planning tidal stream turbine array layouts using a coupled blade element momentum – computational fluid dynamics model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 46-54.
    3. Edmunds, M. & Williams, A.J. & Masters, I. & Croft, T.N., 2017. "An enhanced disk averaged CFD model for the simulation of horizontal axis tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 67-81.
    4. Riglin, Jacob & Carter, Fred & Oblas, Nick & Schleicher, W. Chris & Daskiran, Cosan & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Experimental and numerical characterization of a full-scale portable hydrokinetic turbine prototype for river applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 772-783.
    5. Allmark, Matthew & Ellis, Robert & Lloyd, Catherine & Ordonez-Sanchez, Stephanie & Johannesen, Kate & Byrne, Carl & Johnstone, Cameron & O’Doherty, Tim & Mason-Jones, Allan, 2020. "The development, design and characterisation of a scale model Horizontal Axis Tidal Turbine for dynamic load quantification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 913-930.
    6. Clemente Gotelli & Mirko Musa & Michele Guala & Cristián Escauriaza, 2019. "Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wake Interactions of Marine Hydrokinetic Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Neary, Vincent S. & Gunawan, Budi & Hill, Craig & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2013. "Near and far field flow disturbances induced by model hydrokinetic turbine: ADV and ADP comparison," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-6.
    8. Pinon, Grégory & Mycek, Paul & Germain, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2012. "Numerical simulation of the wake of marine current turbines with a particle method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 111-126.
    9. Walker, Jessica M. & Flack, Karen A. & Lust, Ethan E. & Schultz, Michael P. & Luznik, Luksa, 2014. "Experimental and numerical studies of blade roughness and fouling on marine current turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 257-267.
    10. Niebuhr, C.M. & van Dijk, M. & Neary, V.S. & Bhagwan, J.N., 2019. "A review of hydrokinetic turbines and enhancement techniques for canal installations: Technology, applicability and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Goward Brown, Alice J. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matthew J., 2017. "Tidal energy extraction in three-dimensional ocean models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 244-257.
    12. Aghsaee, Payam & Markfort, Corey D., 2018. "Effects of flow depth variations on the wake recovery behind a horizontal-axis hydrokinetic in-stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 620-629.
    13. Lam, Wei-Haur & Chen, Long & Hashim, Roslan, 2015. "Analytical wake model of tidal current turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 512-521.
    14. Bai, Guanghui & Li, Jun & Fan, Pengfei & Li, Guojun, 2013. "Numerical investigations of the effects of different arrays on power extractions of horizontal axis tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 180-186.
    15. Bahaj, A.S. & Molland, A.F. & Chaplin, J.R. & Batten, W.M.J., 2007. "Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 407-426.
    16. Neary, V.S. & Gunawan, B. & Sale, D.C., 2013. "Turbulent inflow characteristics for hydrokinetic energy conversion in rivers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 437-445.
    17. Ahmadi, Mohammad H.B., 2019. "Influence of upstream turbulence on the wake characteristics of a tidal stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 989-997.
    18. Guerra, Maricarmen & Thomson, Jim, 2019. "Wake measurements from a hydrokinetic river turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 483-495.
    19. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2019. "A two-dimensional Jensen model with a Gaussian-shaped velocity deficit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 46-56.
    20. Fontaine, A.A. & Straka, W.A. & Meyer, R.S. & Jonson, M.L. & Young, S.D. & Neary, V.S., 2020. "Performance and wake flow characterization of a 1:8.7-scale reference USDOE MHKF1 hydrokinetic turbine to establish a verification and validation test database," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 451-467.
    21. Ross, Hannah & Polagye, Brian, 2020. "An experimental assessment of analytical blockage corrections for turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1328-1341.
    22. Mycek, Paul & Gaurier, Benoît & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2014. "Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part II: Two interacting turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 876-892.
    23. Guo, Qiang & Zhou, Lingjiu & Wang, Zhengwei, 2015. "Comparison of BEM-CFD and full rotor geometry simulations for the performance and flow field of a marine current turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 640-648.
    24. Craig Hill & Vincent S. Neary & Michele Guala & Fotis Sotiropoulos, 2020. "Performance and Wake Characterization of a Model Hydrokinetic Turbine: The Reference Model 1 (RM1) Dual Rotor Tidal Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    25. Mycek, Paul & Gaurier, Benoît & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2014. "Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part I: One single turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 729-746.
    26. Kolekar, Nitin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2015. "Performance characterization and placement of a marine hydrokinetic turbine in a tidal channel under boundary proximity and blockage effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 121-133.
    27. De Dominicis, Michela & O'Hara Murray, Rory & Wolf, Judith, 2017. "Multi-scale ocean response to a large tidal stream turbine array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1160-1179.
    28. Myers, L.E. & Bahaj, A.S., 2012. "An experimental investigation simulating flow effects in first generation marine current energy converter arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 28-36.
    29. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    30. Kartezhnikova, Maria & Ravens, Thomas M., 2014. "Hydraulic impacts of hydrokinetic devices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 425-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig Hill & Vincent S. Neary & Michele Guala & Fotis Sotiropoulos, 2020. "Performance and Wake Characterization of a Model Hydrokinetic Turbine: The Reference Model 1 (RM1) Dual Rotor Tidal Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Gao, Jinjin & Liu, Han & Lee, Jiyong & Zheng, Yuan & Guala, Michele & Shen, Lian, 2022. "Large-eddy simulation and Co-Design strategy for a drag-type vertical axis hydrokinetic turbine in open channel flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1305-1316.
    3. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    4. Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Masters, Ian & Banerjee, Arindam & VanZwieten, James H., 2020. "A spatially nonlinear generalised actuator disk model for the simulation of horizontal axis wind and tidal turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Fontaine, A.A. & Straka, W.A. & Meyer, R.S. & Jonson, M.L. & Young, S.D. & Neary, V.S., 2020. "Performance and wake flow characterization of a 1:8.7-scale reference USDOE MHKF1 hydrokinetic turbine to establish a verification and validation test database," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 451-467.
    6. Vinod, Ashwin & Han, Cong & Banerjee, Arindam, 2021. "Tidal turbine performance and near-wake characteristics in a sheared turbulent inflow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 840-852.
    7. Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain & Good, Andrew & Lewis, Michael, 2020. "Wake field study of tidal turbines under realistic flow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1196-1208.
    8. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Sun, Jian & Guo, Jinxi & Wu, Wenlong, 2019. "Hydrodynamic effects of the ratio of rotor diameter to water depth: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 331-341.
    9. Ebdon, Tim & Allmark, Matthew J. & O’Doherty, Daphne M. & Mason-Jones, Allan & O’Doherty, Tim & Germain, Gregory & Gaurier, Benoit, 2021. "The impact of turbulence and turbine operating condition on the wakes of tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2), pages 96-116.
    10. Maduka, Maduka & Li, Chi Wai, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of power performance and wake characteristics of twin flanged duct turbines in tandem under bi-directional tidal flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1543-1567.
    11. Laws, Nicholas D. & Epps, Brenden P., 2016. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion: Technology, research, and outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1245-1259.
    12. Chen, Long & Yao, Yu & Wang, Zhi-liang, 2020. "Development and validation of a prediction model for the multi-wake of tidal stream turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 800-809.
    13. Rahimian, Masoud & Walker, Jessica & Penesis, Irene, 2018. "Performance of a horizontal axis marine current turbine– A comprehensive evaluation using experimental, numerical, and theoretical approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 965-976.
    14. Sutherland, Duncan & Ordonez-Sanchez, Stephanie & Belmont, Michael R. & Moon, Ian & Steynor, Jeffrey & Davey, Thomas & Bruce, Tom, 2018. "Experimental optimisation of power for large arrays of cross-flow tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 685-696.
    15. Riglin, Jacob & Daskiran, Cosan & Jonas, Joseph & Schleicher, W. Chris & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Hydrokinetic turbine array characteristics for river applications and spatially restricted flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 274-283.
    16. Aghsaee, Payam & Markfort, Corey D., 2018. "Effects of flow depth variations on the wake recovery behind a horizontal-axis hydrokinetic in-stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 620-629.
    17. Pyakurel, Parakram & VanZwieten, James H. & Sultan, Cornel & Dhanak, Manhar & Xiros, Nikolaos I., 2017. "Numerical simulation and dynamical response of a moored hydrokinetic turbine operating in the wake of an upstream turbine for control design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1134-1145.
    18. Vinod, Ashwin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2019. "Performance and near-wake characterization of a tidal current turbine in elevated levels of free stream turbulence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    19. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s136403212200079x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.