IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v97y2016icp274-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrokinetic turbine array characteristics for river applications and spatially restricted flows

Author

Listed:
  • Riglin, Jacob
  • Daskiran, Cosan
  • Jonas, Joseph
  • Schleicher, W. Chris
  • Oztekin, Alparslan

Abstract

Multiple hydrokinetic turbines in three array configurations were characterized computationally by employing Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The simulations were conducted for pre-existing turbines operating at their optimum power coefficient of 0.43 which was obtained by design and optimization process. Mechanical power for two adjacent units was predicted for various lateral separation distances. An additional two-by-two turbine array was studied, mimicking a hydro-farm. Numerical simulations were performed using actual physical turbines in the field rather than using low fidelity models such as actuator disk theory. Steady state simulations were conducted using both Coupled and SIMPLE pressure-velocity solvers. Steady three dimensional flow structures were calculated using the k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. At a lateral separation distance of 0.5Dt, the turbines produced an average 86% of the peak power a single turbine producing. Interaction effects at lateral separation distances greater than 2.5Dt were negligible. The wake interaction behind the upstream turbines causes a significant performance reduction for downstream turbines within 6Dt longitudinal spacing. Downstream turbines employed for the present study performed around 20% or less of a single unit turbine performance for the same operating conditions. Downstream turbines yielded comparable reductions in power to that of experimental results.

Suggested Citation

  • Riglin, Jacob & Daskiran, Cosan & Jonas, Joseph & Schleicher, W. Chris & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Hydrokinetic turbine array characteristics for river applications and spatially restricted flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 274-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:274-283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116304918
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malki, Rami & Masters, Ian & Williams, Alison J. & Nick Croft, T., 2014. "Planning tidal stream turbine array layouts using a coupled blade element momentum – computational fluid dynamics model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 46-54.
    2. Myers, L. & Bahaj, A.S., 2005. "Simulated electrical power potential harnessed by marine current turbine arrays in the Alderney Race," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1713-1731.
    3. Bahaj, A.S. & Molland, A.F. & Chaplin, J.R. & Batten, W.M.J., 2007. "Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 407-426.
    4. Mycek, Paul & Gaurier, Benoît & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2014. "Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part II: Two interacting turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 876-892.
    5. Mycek, Paul & Gaurier, Benoît & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2014. "Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour. Part I: One single turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 729-746.
    6. Schleicher, W.C. & Riglin, J.D. & Oztekin, A., 2015. "Numerical characterization of a preliminary portable micro-hydrokinetic turbine rotor design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 234-241.
    7. Myers, L.E. & Bahaj, A.S., 2012. "An experimental investigation simulating flow effects in first generation marine current energy converter arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 28-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John, Bony & Varghese, James, 2021. "Sizing and techno-economic analysis of hydrokinetic turbine based standalone hybrid energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Riglin, Jacob & Carter, Fred & Oblas, Nick & Schleicher, W. Chris & Daskiran, Cosan & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Experimental and numerical characterization of a full-scale portable hydrokinetic turbine prototype for river applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 772-783.
    3. Musa, Mirko & Hill, Craig & Guala, Michele, 2019. "Interaction between hydrokinetic turbine wakes and sediment dynamics: array performance and geomorphic effects under different siting strategies and sediment transport conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 738-753.
    4. Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Camacho, Ramiro Gustavo Ramirez & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lúcio & Botan, Antonio Carlos Barkett & Vinent, Barbara Amoeiro, 2019. "Energy potential and economic analysis of hydrokinetic turbines implementation in rivers: An approach using numerical predictions (CFD) and experimental data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 648-662.
    5. Luca Cacciali & Lorenzo Battisti & Sergio Dell’Anna, 2023. "Multi-Array Design for Hydrokinetic Turbines in Hydropower Canals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Fouz, D.M. & Carballo, R. & Ramos, V. & Iglesias, G., 2019. "Hydrokinetic energy exploitation under combined river and tidal flow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 558-568.
    7. Holanda, Patrícia da Silva & Blanco, Claudio José Cavalcante & Mesquita, André Luiz Amarante & Brasil Junior, Antônio César Pinho & de Figueiredo, Nelio Moura & Macêdo, Emanuel Negrão & Secretan, Yves, 2017. "Assessment of hydrokinetic energy resources downstream of hydropower plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1203-1214.
    8. Barbarelli, Silvio & Florio, Gaetano & Lo Zupone, Giacomo & Scornaienchi, Nino Michele, 2018. "First techno-economic evaluation of array configuration of self-balancing tidal kinetic turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 183-200.
    9. Soto-Rivas, Karina & Richter, David & Escauriaza, Cristian, 2022. "Flow effects of finite-sized tidal turbine arrays in the Chacao Channel, Southern Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 637-647.
    10. Niebuhr, C.M. & van Dijk, M. & Neary, V.S. & Bhagwan, J.N., 2019. "A review of hydrokinetic turbines and enhancement techniques for canal installations: Technology, applicability and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Acarer, Sercan, 2020. "Peak lift-to-drag ratio enhancement of the DU12W262 airfoil by passive flow control and its impact on horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Masters, Ian & Banerjee, Arindam & VanZwieten, James H., 2020. "A spatially nonlinear generalised actuator disk model for the simulation of horizontal axis wind and tidal turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "Tidal farm analysis using an analytical model for the flow velocity prediction in the wake of a tidal turbine with small diameter to depth ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 347-359.
    4. Sutherland, Duncan & Ordonez-Sanchez, Stephanie & Belmont, Michael R. & Moon, Ian & Steynor, Jeffrey & Davey, Thomas & Bruce, Tom, 2018. "Experimental optimisation of power for large arrays of cross-flow tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 685-696.
    5. Niebuhr, C.M. & Schmidt, S. & van Dijk, M. & Smith, L. & Neary, V.S., 2022. "A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Tian, Wenlong & VanZwieten, James H. & Pyakurel, Parakram & Li, Yanjun, 2016. "Influences of yaw angle and turbulence intensity on the performance of a 20 kW in-stream hydrokinetic turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 104-116.
    7. Federico Attene & Francesco Balduzzi & Alessandro Bianchini & M. Sergio Campobasso, 2020. "Using Experimentally Validated Navier-Stokes CFD to Minimize Tidal Stream Turbine Power Losses Due to Wake/Turbine Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Koh, W.X.M. & Ng, E.Y.K., 2017. "A CFD study on the performance of a tidal turbine under various flow and blockage conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 124-137.
    9. Craig Hill & Vincent S. Neary & Michele Guala & Fotis Sotiropoulos, 2020. "Performance and Wake Characterization of a Model Hydrokinetic Turbine: The Reference Model 1 (RM1) Dual Rotor Tidal Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Gaurier, Benoît & Carlier, Clément & Germain, Grégory & Pinon, Grégory & Rivoalen, Elie, 2020. "Three tidal turbines in interaction: An experimental study of turbulence intensity effects on wakes and turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1150-1164.
    11. Maduka, Maduka & Li, Chi Wai, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of power performance and wake characteristics of twin flanged duct turbines in tandem under bi-directional tidal flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1543-1567.
    12. Aghsaee, Payam & Markfort, Corey D., 2018. "Effects of flow depth variations on the wake recovery behind a horizontal-axis hydrokinetic in-stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 620-629.
    13. Pyakurel, Parakram & VanZwieten, James H. & Sultan, Cornel & Dhanak, Manhar & Xiros, Nikolaos I., 2017. "Numerical simulation and dynamical response of a moored hydrokinetic turbine operating in the wake of an upstream turbine for control design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1134-1145.
    14. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    15. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.
    16. Riglin, Jacob & Carter, Fred & Oblas, Nick & Schleicher, W. Chris & Daskiran, Cosan & Oztekin, Alparslan, 2016. "Experimental and numerical characterization of a full-scale portable hydrokinetic turbine prototype for river applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 772-783.
    17. Gao, Jinjin & Liu, Han & Lee, Jiyong & Zheng, Yuan & Guala, Michele & Shen, Lian, 2022. "Large-eddy simulation and Co-Design strategy for a drag-type vertical axis hydrokinetic turbine in open channel flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1305-1316.
    18. Badoe, Charles E. & Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Nambiar, Anup & Sellar, Brian & Kiprakis, Aristides & Masters, Ian, 2022. "Robust validation of a generalised actuator disk CFD model for tidal turbine analysis using the FloWave ocean energy research facility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 232-250.
    19. Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Nicolas & Guillou, Sylvain & Good, Andrew & Lewis, Michael, 2020. "Wake field study of tidal turbines under realistic flow conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1196-1208.
    20. Nasteho Djama Dirieh & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Nicolas Guillou, 2022. "Blockage Corrections for Tidal Turbines—Application to an Array of Turbines in the Alderney Race," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:274-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.