IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v238y2025ics0960148124020561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of displacement between main clean energy types: Evidence from leading developed countries through quantile approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik
  • Mukhtarov, Shahriyar
  • Hajiyeva, Nigar

Abstract

The role of energy transition has been developing under increasing negative impacts of environmental problems. Because there are various options, there is a displacement risk among alternatives. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that clean energy use (EU) alternatives do not displace others. Considering this critical point, the study investigates whether there is a displacement between types of renewable and nuclear energy. So, the study examines leading developed countries (Canada, France, United Kingdom, & United States) by considering impact of three main renewable energy use (REU) types (hydro-HEU, solar-SEU, wind-WEU) on nuclear energy use (NEU), using data from 1999/Q2 to 2023/Q4, and applying quantile approaches. The results reveal that (i) HEU (WEU) displaces NEU in Canada and United States (Canada); (ii) SEU mainly displaces NEU in the countries except United Kingdom; (iii) the higher displacing impact of REU types is seen in Canada, while it is partially displacement for France and United States, and almost no displacement for United Kingdom. Overall, the results demonstrate that all REU types have a certain displacement in Canada, whereas there are partial displacement for other REU types across the countries. Hence, a harmonized and comprehensive energy transition planning among clean energy types is critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Mukhtarov, Shahriyar & Hajiyeva, Nigar, 2025. "Investigation of displacement between main clean energy types: Evidence from leading developed countries through quantile approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:238:y:2025:i:c:s0960148124020561
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Kılıç Depren, Serpil & Ayhan, Fatih & Ulussever, Talat, 2024. "Quantile-based heterogeneous effects of nuclear energy and political stability on the environment in highly nuclear energy-consuming and politically stable countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    2. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Erdogan, Sinan & Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik, 2023. "The influence of income, economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and urbanization on renewable energy investments in G7 countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    4. Sinha, Avik & Ghosh, Vinit & Hussain, Nazim & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Das, Narasingha, 2023. "Green financing of renewable energy generation: Capturing the role of exogenous moderation for ensuring sustainable development," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Barone, G. & Buonomano, A. & Forzano, C. & Palombo, A. & Russo, G., 2023. "The role of energy communities in electricity grid balancing: A flexible tool for smart grid power distribution optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Sim, Nicholas & Zhou, Hongtao, 2015. "Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Verbruggen, Aviel, 2008. "Renewable and nuclear power: A common future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4036-4047, November.
    8. Balcilar, Mehmet & Gupta, Rangan & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2016. "Does uncertainty move the gold price? New evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 74-80.
    9. Jin, Taeyoung & Kim, Jinsoo, 2018. "What is better for mitigating carbon emissions – Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 464-471.
    10. Muhammad Shahbaz & Mehmet Balcilar & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Seyi Saint Akadiri, 2023. "Is causality between globalization and energy consumption bidirectional or unidirectional in top and bottom globalized economies?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1939-1964, April.
    11. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    12. Bhattacharya, Mita & Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Ozturk, Ilhan & Bhattacharya, Sankar, 2016. "The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 733-741.
    13. Victor Troster, 2018. "Testing for Granger-causality in quantiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 850-866, September.
    14. McCombie, Charles & Jefferson, Michael, 2016. "Renewable and nuclear electricity: Comparison of environmental impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 758-769.
    15. Sims, Ralph E. H. & Rogner, Hans-Holger & Gregory, Ken, 2003. "Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 1315-1326, October.
    16. Karakosta, Charikleia & Pappas, Charalampos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Psarras, John, 2013. "Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 187-197.
    17. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E. & Menyah, Kojo & Wolde-Rufael, Yemane, 2010. "On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2255-2260, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Kılıç Depren, Serpil & Ayhan, Fatih & Ulussever, Talat, 2024. "Quantile-based heterogeneous effects of nuclear energy and political stability on the environment in highly nuclear energy-consuming and politically stable countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    2. Sharif, Arshian & Mishra, Shekhar & Sinha, Avik & Jiao, Zhilun & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Afshan, Sahar, 2020. "The renewable energy consumption-environmental degradation nexus in Top-10 polluted countries: Fresh insights from quantile-on-quantile regression approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 670-690.
    3. Ansari, Mohd Arshad, 2022. "Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Bouri, Elie & Gupta, Rangan & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Does Bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from wavelet-based quantile-in-quantile regressions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 87-95.
    5. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Ugur Korkut Pata, 2023. "The Function of Geopolitical Risk on Carbon Neutrality Under the Shadow of Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Evidence from Russia's Sectoral CO2 Emissions by High-Frequency Data and Quantile-Based Methods," Journal of Sustainable Development Issues (JOSDI), SDIjournals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Joshua Sunday Riti & Ada Tony Odu, 2023. "Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and Its implication on climate change in india," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1305-1326, August.
    7. Liu, Xuyi & Zhang, Shun & Bae, Junghan, 2017. "The nexus of renewable energy-agriculture-environment in BRICS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 489-496.
    8. Selmi, Refk & Mensi, Walid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Bouoiyour, Jamal, 2018. "Is Bitcoin a hedge, a safe haven or a diversifier for oil price movements? A comparison with gold," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 787-801.
    9. Hammed, Oluwaseyi Musibau & Yanotti, Maria & Vespignani, Joaquin & Nepal, Rabindra, 2020. "The moderating role of green energy and energy-innovation in environmental kuznets: Insights from quantile-quantile analysis," Working Papers 2020-03, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    10. Oluwatoyin Abidemi Somoye & Mehdi Seraj & Huseyin Ozdeser & Muhammad Mar’I, 2023. "Quantile relationship between financial development, income, price, CO2 emissions and renewable energy consumption: evidence from Nigeria," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Ilhan Ozturk & Arshian Sharif & Danish Iqbal Godil & Adnan Yousuf & Iram Tahir, 2023. "The Dynamic Nexus Between International Tourism and Environmental Degradation in Top Twenty Tourist Destinations: New Insights From Quantile-on-Quantile Approach," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(3), pages 532-562, June.
    12. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Hasan Murat Ertuğrul & Dilvin Taşkın & Fatih Ayhan, 2024. "Asymmetric nexus of coal consumption with environmental quality and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS, E7, and Fragile Five countries by novel quantile approaches," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(4), pages 2228-2247, June.
    13. Yang, Qiang & Huo, Jiale & Saqib, Najia & Mahmood, Haider, 2022. "Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 485-494.
    14. Jiang, Wei & Hu, Yanhui & Zhao, Xiangyu, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on carbon market in China: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Mo, Bin & Nie, He & Zhao, Rongjie, 2024. "Dynamic nonlinear effects of geopolitical risks on commodities: Fresh evidence from quantile methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    16. Ramzi Benkraiem & Thi hong van Hoang & Amine Lahiani & Anthony Miloudi, 2018. "Crude oil and equity markets in major European countries: New evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 2094-2110.
    17. Alex O. Acheampong & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Janet Dzator & Isaac Koomson, 2023. "Income inequality and economic growth in BRICS: insights from non-parametric techniques," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 21(3), pages 619-640, September.
    18. Dogan, Eyup & Seker, Fahri, 2016. "The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1074-1085.
    19. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Ugur Korkut Pata & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2025. "Impact of green bonds on CO2 emissions and disaggregated level renewable electricity in China and the United States of America," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Zakaria, Muhammad & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2018. "The energy consumption and economic growth nexus in top ten energy-consuming countries: Fresh evidence from using the quantile-on-quantile approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 282-301.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:238:y:2025:i:c:s0960148124020561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.