IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v156y2020icp235-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermophilic vs. mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Modelling and energy balance for its applicability at a full scale WWTP

Author

Listed:
  • Ruffino, Barbara
  • Cerutti, Alberto
  • Campo, Giuseppe
  • Scibilia, Gerardo
  • Lorenzi, Eugenio
  • Zanetti, Mariachiara

Abstract

Sewage sludge produced in WWTPs are currently digested in mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) processes with the aim of recovering heat and electricity. However, often, the low biodegradability of waste activated sludge (WAS) limits the complete thermal self-sustainability of the process. This study presents the results of AD tests carried out on WAS in semi-continuous reactors (44 L and 240 L) in mesophilic (38 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) thermal regimes. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 20 days and the organic loading rate (OLR) of 1 kg VS/m3∙d in all tests. The tests returned a specific methane production (SMP) of 0.120 Nm3/kg VS added for the mesophilic process (240 L reactor) and SMPs of 0.188 and 0.176 Nm3/kg VS added for the tests carried out under the thermophilic regime in 44 L and 240 L, respectively. Experimental data were modelled with a first-order rate reaction, where B0, that is the SMP after an infinite HRT, and k, the hydrolysis constant, were the key parameters. B0 and k were found equal to 0.147 Nm3/kg VS and 0.08 d−1 respectively, for the mesophilic process, and to 0.218 Nm3/kg VS and 0.350 d−1 for the thermophilic process. For the thermophilic process, the model was calibrated with the data from the 44 L reactor and validated with those from the 240 L reactor. An error of only 1% resulted. Finally, it was demonstrated that a full-scale digestion scheme, where primary and secondary sludge were digested separately, in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions respectively, and the heat of the digestates was used to heat the cold sludge, allowed to carry out the process with a complete thermal self-sustainability already at a sludge TS content of 3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2020. "Thermophilic vs. mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Modelling and energy balance for its applicability at a full scale WWTP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-248.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:156:y:2020:i:c:p:235-248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120306005
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Guodong & Wu, Zhiyue & Cheng, Fangqin & Min, Zhang & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2016. "Thermophilic digestion of waste-activated sludge coupled with solar pond," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 142-147.
    2. do Carmo Precci Lopes, Alice & Mudadu Silva, Cláudio & Pereira Rosa, André & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fábio, 2018. "Biogas production from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of kraft pulp mill sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 40-49.
    3. Caporgno, M.P. & Trobajo, R. & Caiola, N. & Ibáñez, C. & Fabregat, A. & Bengoa, C., 2015. "Biogas production from sewage sludge and microalgae co-digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 374-380.
    4. Montecchio, D. & Braguglia, C.M. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A., 2017. "A model-based tool for reactor configuration of thermophilic biogas plants fed with Waste Activated Sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 411-419.
    5. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    6. Zupančič, G.D. & Roš, M., 2003. "Heat and energy requirements in thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 2255-2267.
    7. Villamil, J.A. & Mohedano, A.F. & San Martín, J. & Rodriguez, J.J. & de la Rubia, M.A., 2020. "Anaerobic co-digestion of the process water from waste activated sludge hydrothermally treated with primary sewage sludge. A new approach for sewage sludge management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 435-443.
    8. Leite, Wanderli Rogério Moreira & Gottardo, Marco & Pavan, Paolo & Belli Filho, Paulo & Bolzonella, David, 2016. "Performance and energy aspects of single and two phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1324-1331.
    9. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2019. "Improvement of energy recovery from the digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) through intermediate treatments: The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the first-stage digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 191-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Runxi & Huang, Runyao & Shen, Ziheng & Wang, Hongtao & Xu, Jin, 2021. "Optimizing the recovery pathway of a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model by balancing energy recovery and eco-efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Campo, Giuseppe & Cerutti, Alberto & Zanetti, Mariachiara & De Ceglia, Margherita & Scibilia, Gerardo & Ruffino, Barbara, 2023. "A modelling approach for the assessment of energy recovery and impact on the water line of sludge pre-treatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kossińska, Nina & Krzyżyńska, Renata & Ghazal, Heba & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge and resulting biofuels as a sustainable energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. Brémond, Ulysse & de Buyer, Raphaëlle & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernet, Nicolas & Carrere, Hélène, 2018. "Biological pretreatments of biomass for improving biogas production: an overview from lab scale to full-scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 583-604.
    3. Kasinath, Archana & Byliński, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska –Skwarek, Anna & Szopińska, Małgorzata & Zaborowska, Ewa & Luczkiewicz, Aneta & Fudala –Ksiazek, Sylwia, 2023. "Biochemical assays of intensified methane content in biogas from low-temperature processing of waste activated sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Chen, Hong & Yi, Hao & Li, Hechao & Guo, Xuesong & Xiao, Benyi, 2020. "Effects of thermal and thermal-alkaline pretreatments on continuous anaerobic sludge digestion: Performance, energy balance and, enhancement mechanism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2409-2416.
    5. Wang, Hui & Zeng, Shufang & Pan, Xiaoli & Liu, Lei & Chen, Yunjie & Tang, Jiawei & Luo, Feng, 2022. "Bioelectrochemically assisting anaerobic digestion enhanced methane production under low-temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1071-1083.
    6. Omar, M.N. & Samak, A.A. & Keshek, M.H. & Elsisi, S.F., 2020. "Simulation and validation model for using the energy produced from broiler litter waste in their house and its requirement of energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 920-928.
    7. Justyna Górka & Małgorzata Cimochowicz-Rybicka & Dominika Poproch, 2022. "Sludge Management at the Kraków-Płaszów WWTP—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    8. Huang, Bao-Cheng & He, Chuan-Shu & Fan, Nian-Si & Jin, Ren-Cun & Yu, Han-Qing, 2020. "Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    10. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    11. Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina & Girotto, Francesca & Rafieenia, Razieh & Danieli, Luciano & Alibardi, Luca, 2018. "Two-stage anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste – Effects of process conditions during batch tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 14-20.
    12. Siwal, Samarjeet Singh & Zhang, Qibo & Devi, Nishu & Saini, Adesh Kumar & Saini, Vipin & Pareek, Bhawna & Gaidukovs, Sergejs & Thakur, Vijay Kumar, 2021. "Recovery processes of sustainable energy using different biomass and wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Aneta Kowalska & Anna Grobelak & Åsgeir R. Almås & Bal Ram Singh, 2020. "Effect of Biowastes on Soil Remediation, Plant Productivity and Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Adrian Gonzalez & Hongxiao Guo & Oscar Ortega-Ibáñez & Coert Petri & Jules B. van Lier & Merle de Kreuk & Alexander Hendriks, 2020. "Mild Thermal Pre-Treatment of Waste Activated Sludge to Increase Loading Capacity, Biogas Production, and Solids’ Degradation: A Pilot-Scale Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Gottardo, Marco & Micolucci, Federico & Bolzonella, David & Uellendahl, Hinrich & Pavan, Paolo, 2017. "Pilot scale fermentation coupled with anaerobic digestion of food waste - Effect of dynamic digestate recirculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 455-463.
    16. Pagés-Díaz, Jhosané & Cerda Alvarado, Andrés Osvaldo & Montalvo, Silvio & Diaz-Robles, Luis & Curio, César Huiliñir, 2020. "Anaerobic bio-methane potential of the liquors from hydrothermal carbonization of different lignocellulose biomasses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 182-189.
    17. Tong, Huanhuan & Yao, Zhiyi & Lim, Jun Wei & Mao, Liwei & Zhang, Jingxing & Ge, Tian Shu & Peng, Ying Hong & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "Harvest green energy through energy recovery from waste: A technology review and an assessment of Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 163-178.
    18. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    19. Mohammed S. M. Al-Azzawi & Daphne Gondhalekar & Jörg E. Drewes, 2022. "Neighborhood-Scale Urban Water Reclamation with Integrated Resource Recovery for Establishing Nexus City in Munich, Germany: Pipe Dream or Reality?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:156:y:2020:i:c:p:235-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.