IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4567-d1736411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food Waste Bioconversion Features Depending on the Regime of Anaerobic Digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Zofia Cieślik

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Andrzej Jan Lewicki

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Wojciech Czekała

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Iryna Vaskina

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Approximately one-third of global food production is wasted annually, which contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and economic costs. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an effective method for converting food waste into biogas, but its efficiency depends on factors such as temperature and substrate composition. This study compared mesophilic and thermophilic AD of selectively collected fruit and vegetable waste, quantifying process efficiency and identifying factors leading to collapse. Studies were performed in 1 dm 3 reactors with gradually increasing organic loading rates until process collapse. Process dynamics, stability, and gas yields were assessed through daily biogas measurements and analyses of pH, FOS/TAC ratio, sCOD, ammonia, volatile fatty acids, alcohols, total and volatile solids, and C/N ratio. Research has shown that peak methane yields occurred at OLR = 0.5–1.0 kg VS·m −3 ·d −1 , with thermophilic systems producing 0.63–5.48% more methane during stable phases. Collapse occurred at OLR = 3.0 in thermophilic and 4.0 in mesophilic reactors, accompanied by sharp increases in methanol, acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, and FOS/TAC. The pH dropped to 5.49 and 6.09. While thermophilic conditions offered higher methane yields, they were more susceptible to rapid process destabilization due to intermediate metabolite accumulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Zofia Cieślik & Andrzej Jan Lewicki & Wojciech Czekała & Iryna Vaskina, 2025. "Food Waste Bioconversion Features Depending on the Regime of Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4567-:d:1736411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Li-Jie & Qin, Yu & Hojo, Toshimasa & Li, Yu-You, 2015. "Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by temperature-phased process with recycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 381-389.
    2. Bogusława Waliszewska & Hanna Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Leszek Majchrzak & Eliza Gaweł & Maciej Murawski & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Iryna Vaskina & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała, 2024. "Evaluation of Changes in the Chemical Composition of Grasses as a Result of the Methane Fermentation Process and Biogas Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Adam Masłoń & Joanna Czarnota & Aleksandra Szaja & Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak & Grzegorz Łagód, 2020. "The Enhancement of Energy Efficiency in a Wastewater Treatment Plant through Sustainable Biogas Use: Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Mahdy, Ahmed & Wandera, Simon M. & Yin, Dongmin & Dong, Renjie, 2020. "Improved high solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by moderate in situ ammonia stripping and its relation to metabolic pathway," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2380-2389.
    5. Di Maria, Francesco & Sordi, Alessio & Cirulli, Giuseppe & Micale, Caterina, 2015. "Amount of energy recoverable from an existing sludge digester with the co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste at reduced retention time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 9-14.
    6. Caporgno, M.P. & Trobajo, R. & Caiola, N. & Ibáñez, C. & Fabregat, A. & Bengoa, C., 2015. "Biogas production from sewage sludge and microalgae co-digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 374-380.
    7. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2020. "Thermophilic vs. mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Modelling and energy balance for its applicability at a full scale WWTP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-248.
    8. Zhang, Cunsheng & Su, Haijia & Baeyens, Jan & Tan, Tianwei, 2014. "Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 383-392.
    9. Leite, Wanderli Rogério Moreira & Gottardo, Marco & Pavan, Paolo & Belli Filho, Paulo & Bolzonella, David, 2016. "Performance and energy aspects of single and two phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1324-1331.
    10. A. Sinan Akturk & Goksel N. Demirer, 2020. "Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Contini, Stefano, 2018. "Are EU waste-to-energy technologies effective for exploiting the energy in bio-waste?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1557-1572.
    2. Chiappero, Marco & Norouzi, Omid & Hu, Mingyu & Demichelis, Francesca & Berruti, Franco & Di Maria, Francesco & Mašek, Ondřej & Fiore, Silvia, 2020. "Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Ruffino, Barbara & Cerutti, Alberto & Campo, Giuseppe & Scibilia, Gerardo & Lorenzi, Eugenio & Zanetti, Mariachiara, 2020. "Thermophilic vs. mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: Modelling and energy balance for its applicability at a full scale WWTP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-248.
    4. German Smetana & Ewa Neczaj & Anna Grosser, 2021. "Biomethane Potential of Selected Organic Waste and Sewage Sludge at Different Temperature Regimes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Aleksandra Szaja & Agnieszka Montusiewicz & Magdalena Lebiocka, 2021. "The Energetic Aspect of Organic Wastes Addition on Sewage Sludge Anaerobic Digestion: A Laboratory Investigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    7. Chen, Hong & Yi, Hao & Li, Hechao & Guo, Xuesong & Xiao, Benyi, 2020. "Effects of thermal and thermal-alkaline pretreatments on continuous anaerobic sludge digestion: Performance, energy balance and, enhancement mechanism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2409-2416.
    8. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    9. Palakodeti, Advait & Azman, Samet & Rossi, Barbara & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2021. "A critical review of ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate of organic wastes via stripping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Abhinav Choudhury & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Co-Digestion of Gummy Waste with a Food Waste, Grease Waste, and Dairy Manure Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    12. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    14. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    16. Maciej Murawski & Wojciech Czekała & Leszek Majchrzak & Bogusława Waliszewska & Alicja Lerczak & Magdalena Janyszek-Sołtysiak & Magdalena Zborowska & Marta Cieślik & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Jacek Dach, 2025. "Ruderal Habitats: A Source for Biomass and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Pérez-Rodríguez, N. & García-Bernet, D. & Domínguez, J.M., 2017. "Extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments on corn cob for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 597-603.
    18. Adam Masłoń & Joanna Czarnota & Paulina Szczyrba & Aleksandra Szaja & Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak & Grzegorz Łagód, 2024. "Assessment of Energy Self-Sufficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants—A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Tae-Bong Kim & Jun-Hyeong Lee & Young-Man Yoon, 2024. "Residence Time Reduction in Anaerobic Reactors: Investigating the Economic Benefits of Magnetite-Induced Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4567-:d:1736411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.