IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics0951832023006932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-driven risk assessment of Arctic maritime incidents: Using machine learning to predict incident types and identify risk factors

Author

Listed:
  • Kandel, Rajesh
  • Baroud, Hiba

Abstract

The rise in Arctic temperatures has caused sea ice to melt, making the region more navigable through a new, shorter shipping route. Navigating the Arctic poses high risks due to extreme environmental conditions. This study proposes scalable data-driven predictive models to assess the risk of Arctic navigation under uncertain weather and sea ice conditions. Machine learning is applied to predict the type of Arctic incidents and identify their risk factors. Several models are investigated, and the most accurate model for the two Arctic routes, the North West Passage (NWP) and the Northern Sea Route (NSR), is determined based on several validation metrics. Random forest and Naïve Bayes models provide the best accuracy and F1-score for NWP and NSR, respectively. The wind speed, vessel type, length, and age are important risk factors for NWP while temperature at 2 m above the surface, vessel length, and age are important for NSR. Partial dependence plots are used to investigate the effect of each feature on predicting each incident type. Equipment failures are more common among newer and longer vessels. Collision related incidents are more likely to be predicted for longer vessels, while grounding related incidents are more frequent at higher air temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Kandel, Rajesh & Baroud, Hiba, 2024. "A data-driven risk assessment of Arctic maritime incidents: Using machine learning to predict incident types and identify risk factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023006932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023006932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.