IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v242y2024ics0951832023007044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A physics-informed autoencoder for system health state assessment based on energy-oriented system performance

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xucong
  • Peng, Zhaoqin
  • Tang, Diyin
  • Chen, Juan
  • Zio, Enrico
  • Zheng, Zaiping

Abstract

Health Indicators (HIs) have been widely used for health state assessments. In many applications, HI with physical meaning is a preferred choice to assist system health management due to its inherent nature of objectively and accurately representing the system health state. However, in many cases, the true value of HI with physical meaning is difficult to obtain due to the difficulty in measuring them, which means, the HI is hidden from the user during system operation. It results in difficulty in training HI construction methods. In light of these challenges, we propose a physics-informed autoencoder for HI construction by fusing the physics-based model with deep learning (DL) approaches. In this framework, we redefine the conventional HI construction process with autoencoders into a new paradigm: mapping the sensor readings to a degradation-represented latent space by a DL model and reconstructing the sensor readings by a physics-based model. The latent variable, bridging the connection between the encoder and decoder, works as the HI and is meticulously designed with an energy-oriented perspective, thus ensuring its applicability across various systems. Furthermore, a novel training strategy is proposed for this framework to be well-trained. The superiority and effectiveness of the proposed framework are validated on the CALCE battery dataset and electromechanical actuator simulation data. In the two examples, the SOH of batteries and the energy efficiency of electromechanical actuators can both be estimated using the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xucong & Peng, Zhaoqin & Tang, Diyin & Chen, Juan & Zio, Enrico & Zheng, Zaiping, 2024. "A physics-informed autoencoder for system health state assessment based on energy-oriented system performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007044
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023007044
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Khorasgani, Hamed & Biswas, Gautam & Sankararaman, Shankar, 2016. "Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 8-18.
    5. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    6. Li, Penghua & Zhang, Zijian & Grosu, Radu & Deng, Zhongwei & Hou, Jie & Rong, Yujun & Wu, Rui, 2022. "An end-to-end neural network framework for state-of-health estimation and remaining useful life prediction of electric vehicle lithium batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Changyue Song & Kaibo Liu, 2018. "Statistical degradation modeling and prognostics of multiple sensor signals via data fusion: A composite health index approach," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(10), pages 853-867, October.
    8. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Meng, Huixing & Liu, Xuan & Xing, Jinduo & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for economic evaluation of predictive maintenance technologies by integrating system dynamics and evolutionary game modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Zhang, Ying & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Prognostics and health management of Lithium-ion battery using deep learning methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Wang, Fujin & Zhao, Zhibin & Zhai, Zhi & Shang, Zuogang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2023. "Explainability-driven model improvement for SOH estimation of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. He, Hongwen & Zhang, Xiaowei & Xiong, Rui & Xu, Yongli & Guo, Hongqiang, 2012. "Online model-based estimation of state-of-charge and open-circuit voltage of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 310-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Park, Hyung Jun & Kim, Nam H. & Choi, Joo-Ho, 2024. "A robust health prediction using Bayesian approach guided by physical constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Yan-Hui & Ruan, Sheng-Jia & Chen, Yun-Xia & Li, Yan-Fu, 2023. "Physics-informed deep learning for lithium-ion battery diagnostics using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Xiong, Jiawei & Zhou, Jian & Ma, Yizhong & Zhang, Fengxia & Lin, Chenglong, 2023. "Adaptive deep learning-based remaining useful life prediction framework for systems with multiple failure patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Wang, Huan & Li, Yan-Fu & Zhang, Ying, 2023. "Bioinspired spiking spatiotemporal attention framework for lithium-ion batteries state-of-health estimation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Yang, Bo & Qian, Yucun & Li, Qiang & Chen, Qian & Wu, Jiyang & Luo, Enbo & Xie, Rui & Zheng, Ruyi & Yan, Yunfeng & Su, Shi & Wang, Jingbo, 2024. "Critical summary and perspectives on state-of-health of lithium-ion battery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    5. Xu, Huanwei & Wu, Lingfeng & Xiong, Shizhe & Li, Wei & Garg, Akhil & Gao, Liang, 2023. "An improved CNN-LSTM model-based state-of-health estimation approach for lithium-ion batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    6. Wang, Fujin & Zhao, Zhibin & Zhai, Zhi & Shang, Zuogang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2023. "Explainability-driven model improvement for SOH estimation of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Nejjar, Ismail & Geissmann, Fabian & Zhao, Mengjie & Taal, Cees & Fink, Olga, 2024. "Domain adaptation via alignment of operation profile for Remaining Useful Lifetime prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Xu, Xiaodong & Tang, Shengjin & Han, Xuebing & Lu, Languang & Wu, Yu & Yu, Chuanqiang & Sun, Xiaoyan & Xie, Jian & Feng, Xuning & Ouyang, Minggao, 2023. "Fast capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries using aging mechanism-informed bidirectional long short-term memory network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Aizpurua, J.I. & Stewart, B.G. & McArthur, S.D.J. & Penalba, M. & Barrenetxea, M. & Muxika, E. & Ringwood, J.V., 2022. "Probabilistic forecasting informed failure prognostics framework for improved RUL prediction under uncertainty: A transformer case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. Zhu, Rong & Chen, Yuan & Peng, Weiwen & Ye, Zhi-Sheng, 2022. "Bayesian deep-learning for RUL prediction: An active learning perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Xiang, Sheng & Li, Penghua & Huang, Yi & Luo, Jun & Qin, Yi, 2024. "Single gated RNN with differential weighted information storage mechanism and its application to machine RUL prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    15. Hao Wu & Michael Browne, 2015. "Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 619-624, September.
    16. Das, Kaushik & Kumar, Roushan & Krishna, Anurup, 2024. "Analyzing electric vehicle battery health performance using supervised machine learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    17. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yifan & Shao, Haonan & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "A novel dual attention mechanism combined with knowledge for remaining useful life prediction based on gated recurrent units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    18. Xiaoyu Xiong & Benjamin D. Youngman & Theodoros Economou, 2021. "Data fusion with Gaussian processes for estimation of environmental hazard events," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.
    19. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:242:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.