IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v257y2025ipbs0951832025000535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey on few-shot learning for remaining useful life prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Mo, Renpeng
  • Zhou, Han
  • Yin, Hongpeng
  • Si, Xiaosheng

Abstract

The prediction performance of most data-driven remaining useful life (RUL) prediction methods relies on sufficient training samples, which is challenging in few-shot scenarios such as time-consuming or expensive monitoring, and the lack of historical data for newer equipment. Therefore, utilizing few-shot learning (FSL) methods to accurately obtain mapping functions of equipment RUL from limited data has attracted the attention of many researchers. Despite this, a systematic review of this class of prediction methods is still lacking. To fill this gap, this review comprehensively examines numerous research findings on RUL prediction in few-shot scenarios, groups the existing FSL for RUL prediction methods into three categories based on different sources of prior knowledge, introduces the principles, and recent advances of each category in detail, and, in particular, highlights the impact and constraints of RUL prediction task characteristics on various FSL methods. Additionally, this review discusses the challenges faced by FSL-RUL prediction during development and application, and explores potential future opportunities from an informative and knowledge perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Mo, Renpeng & Zhou, Han & Yin, Hongpeng & Si, Xiaosheng, 2025. "A survey on few-shot learning for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 257(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:257:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025000535
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.110850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025000535
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.110850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:257:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025000535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.