IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v232y2023ics0951832022006937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhanhang
  • Zhou, Jian
  • Nassif, Hani
  • Coit, David
  • Bae, Jinwoo

Abstract

Many methods have been developed for degradation prediction. Machine learning-based methods have the advantages of capturing complex non-linear relations in degradation processes, but they often suffer from limitations of available dataset. Physics-based methods are closely related to physical degradation mechanism, while they are often limited by the incompleteness of modeling. This work presents a new hybrid method for degradation prediction with bias correction by combining the degradation tendency information from the physics-based stochastic degradation model with machine learning approaches. A gamma-gamma two-stage degradation model is adopted to obtain the expected degradation path, which is used to develop the input of Bi-direction long-short term memory (Bi-LSTM) network for degradation prediction. Case studies of bridge deck rebar degradation are conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach, where actual data is collected based on 33-months of rebar degradation experiments under different environmental conditions. The results show that the proposed hybrid method outperforms other machine learning-based methods. Specifically, the mean square error of rebar degradation prediction is reduced at least by 27% under the proposed approach in comparison with pure Bi-LSTM. This work provides insights for performing bias learning in prognosis by leveraging the advantages of physics-based methods and machine learning approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:232:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006937
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.109078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022006937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.109078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Deng, Yingjun & Bucchianico, Alessandro Di & Pechenizkiy, Mykola, 2020. "Controlling the accuracy and uncertainty trade-off in RUL prediction with a surrogate Wiener propagation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Dong, Ming & He, David, 2007. "Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 858-878, May.
    4. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Zio, Enrico & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique, 2011. "Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1527-1534.
    6. Li, Sai & Fang, Huajing & Shi, Bing, 2021. "Remaining useful life estimation of Lithium-ion battery based on interacting multiple model particle filter and support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Chen, Jinglong & Jing, Hongjie & Chang, Yuanhong & Liu, Qian, 2019. "Gated recurrent unit based recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of nonlinear deterioration process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 372-382.
    8. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    9. Shi, Zunya & Chehade, Abdallah, 2021. "A dual-LSTM framework combining change point detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Santosh, T.V. & Srivastava, A. & Sanyasi Rao, V.V.S. & Ghosh, A.K. & Kushwaha, H.S., 2009. "Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 759-762.
    12. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    13. Santosh, T.V. & Vinod, Gopika & Saraf, R.K. & Ghosh, A.K. & Kushwaha, H.S., 2007. "Application of artificial neural networks to nuclear power plant transient diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1468-1472.
    14. Shaheer Ansari & Afida Ayob & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Aini Hussain & Mohamad Hanif Md Saad, 2021. "Multi-Channel Profile Based Artificial Neural Network Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Dong, Qinglai & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-212.
    16. da Costa, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira & Akçay, Alp & Zhang, Yingqian & Kaymak, Uzay, 2020. "Remaining useful lifetime prediction via deep domain adaptation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oster, Matthew R. & King, Ethan & Bakker, Craig & Bhattacharya, Arnab & Chatterjee, Samrat & Pan, Feng, 2023. "Multi-level optimization with the koopman operator for data-driven, domain-aware, and dynamic system security," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Xu, Xiaodong & Tang, Shengjin & Han, Xuebing & Lu, Languang & Wu, Yu & Yu, Chuanqiang & Sun, Xiaoyan & Xie, Jian & Feng, Xuning & Ouyang, Minggao, 2023. "Fast capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries using aging mechanism-informed bidirectional long short-term memory network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Xiong, Jiawei & Zhou, Jian & Ma, Yizhong & Zhang, Fengxia & Lin, Chenglong, 2023. "Adaptive deep learning-based remaining useful life prediction framework for systems with multiple failure patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Yongmeng & Wu, Jiechang & Wu, Jun & Liu, Shuyong, 2022. "Dimensionality reduce-based for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools with multisensor fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    2. Xiong, Jiawei & Zhou, Jian & Ma, Yizhong & Zhang, Fengxia & Lin, Chenglong, 2023. "Adaptive deep learning-based remaining useful life prediction framework for systems with multiple failure patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Yan, Jianhai & He, Zhen & He, Shuguang, 2023. "Multitask learning of health state assessment and remaining useful life prediction for sensor-equipped machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning for predictive aircraft maintenance using probabilistic Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Xu, Danyang & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Yang, Zan & Wang, Dapeng, 2022. "A novel dual-stream self-attention neural network for remaining useful life estimation of mechanical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    10. Fu, Song & Lin, Lin & Wang, Yue & Guo, Feng & Zhao, Minghang & Zhong, Baihong & Zhong, Shisheng, 2024. "MCA-DTCN: A novel dual-task temporal convolutional network with multi-channel attention for first prediction time detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Tang, Ting & Yuan, Huimei, 2022. "A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Youdao Wang & Yifan Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Scale Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Prakash, Om & Samantaray, Arun Kumar, 2021. "Prognosis of Dynamical System Components with Varying Degradation Patterns using model–data–fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Wang, Yuan & Lei, Yaguo & Li, Naipeng & Yan, Tao & Si, Xiaosheng, 2023. "Deep multisource parallel bilinear-fusion network for remaining useful life prediction of machinery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Yu, Wennian & Shao, Yimin & Xu, Jin & Mechefske, Chris, 2022. "An adaptive and generalized Wiener process model with a recursive filtering algorithm for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Wu, Shimeng & Li, Xiang & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "Prediction of remaining useful life based on bidirectional gated recurrent unit with temporal self-attention mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Song, Kai & Cui, Lirong, 2022. "A common random effect induced bivariate gamma degradation process with application to remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Zhou, Tuqiang & Wu, Wanting & Peng, Liqun & Zhang, Mingyang & Li, Zhixiong & Xiong, Yubing & Bai, Yuelong, 2022. "Evaluation of urban bus service reliability on variable time horizons using a hybrid deep learning method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:232:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.