IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v237y2023ics0951832023002478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data

Author

Listed:
  • He, Yuxuan
  • Su, Huai
  • Zio, Enrico
  • Peng, Shiliang
  • Fan, Lin
  • Yang, Zhaoming
  • Yang, Zhe
  • Zhang, Jinjun

Abstract

Data-driven models, especially deep learning models, are proposed for remaining useful life (RUL) estimation with multisensor signals. Various treatments to reduce data sensitivity, addressing the difficulty of learning dynamic topologies, and coping with the lack of engineering physics guidance for model training limit the performance of these models and their use. This study proposes a systematic method to estimate RUL with multisensory data under dynamic operating conditions and multiple failure modes. Firstly, ARMA regression is introduced into the graph convolutional network(GCN) model. This allows the information loss in the GCN model following training to be lifted with low computational complexity. Secondly, the physics equations of balancing for economy and security in preventive maintenance policies is introduced in the loss function for training. This involves in a way to impose a higher penalty on delayed predictions, so to focus the neural network training on the control of high-risk situations. Finally, the method is validated on the popular C-MAPSS dataset. Compared with other cutting-edge methods, the proposed method can ensure high-fitting accuracy with strong security. In practice, the controllability and flexibility of deep learning models are enhanced, ensuring the reduction of high-risk, uncertain situations while sacrificing as little accuracy as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002478
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023002478
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Ballabio, Guido & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimization of the Operation and Maintenance of renewable energy systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 752-763.
    3. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Patil, Meru A. & Tagade, Piyush & Hariharan, Krishnan S. & Kolake, Subramanya M. & Song, Taewon & Yeo, Taejung & Doo, Seokgwang, 2015. "A novel multistage Support Vector Machine based approach for Li ion battery remaining useful life estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 285-297.
    5. Listou Ellefsen, André & Bjørlykhaug, Emil & Æsøy, Vilmar & Ushakov, Sergey & Zhang, Houxiang, 2019. "Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 240-251.
    6. Xiang, Sheng & Qin, Yi & Luo, Jun & Pu, Huayan & Tang, Baoping, 2021. "Multicellular LSTM-based deep learning model for aero-engine remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Chen, Jinglong & Jing, Hongjie & Chang, Yuanhong & Liu, Qian, 2019. "Gated recurrent unit based recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of nonlinear deterioration process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 372-382.
    8. Liu, Junqiang & Lei, Fan & Pan, Chunlu & Hu, Dongbin & Zuo, Hongfu, 2021. "Prediction of remaining useful life of multi-stage aero-engine based on clustering and LSTM fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    10. Zhang, Yong & Xin, Yuqi & Liu, Zhi-wei & Chi, Ming & Ma, Guijun, 2022. "Health status assessment and remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine based on BiGRU and MMoE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Shi, Zunya & Chehade, Abdallah, 2021. "A dual-LSTM framework combining change point detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Li, Tianfu & Zhao, Zhibin & Sun, Chuang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2021. "Hierarchical attention graph convolutional network to fuse multi-sensor signals for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Yu, Wennian & Kim, II Yong & Mechefske, Chris, 2020. "An improved similarity-based prognostic algorithm for RUL estimation using an RNN autoencoder scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Jianhai & He, Zhen & He, Shuguang, 2023. "Multitask learning of health state assessment and remaining useful life prediction for sensor-equipped machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Xu, Dan & Xiao, Xiaoqi & Liu, Jie & Sui, Shaobo, 2023. "Spatio-temporal degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction under multiple operating conditions based on attention mechanism and deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Xiong, Jiawei & Zhou, Jian & Ma, Yizhong & Zhang, Fengxia & Lin, Chenglong, 2023. "Adaptive deep learning-based remaining useful life prediction framework for systems with multiple failure patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    5. Kamei, Sayaka & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2023. "A comparison study of centralized and decentralized federated learning approaches utilizing the transformer architecture for estimating remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Huang, Zhifu & Yang, Yang & Hu, Yawei & Ding, Xiang & Li, Xuanlin & Liu, Yongbin, 2023. "Attention-augmented recalibrated and compensatory network for machine remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Wang, Chu & Dou, Manfeng & Li, Zhongliang & Outbib, Rachid & Zhao, Dongdong & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Yuanlin & Liang, Bin & Wang, Peng, 2023. "Data-driven prognostics based on time-frequency analysis and symbolic recurrent neural network for fuel cells under dynamic load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Zhu, Yongmeng & Wu, Jiechang & Wu, Jun & Liu, Shuyong, 2022. "Dimensionality reduce-based for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools with multisensor fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    11. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Wu, Shimeng & Li, Xiang & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "Prediction of remaining useful life based on bidirectional gated recurrent unit with temporal self-attention mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Kong, Ziqian & Jin, Xiaohang & Xu, Zhengguo & Chen, Zian, 2023. "A contrastive learning framework enhanced by unlabeled samples for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Chang, Yuanhong & Li, Fudong & Chen, Jinglong & Liu, Yulang & Li, Zipeng, 2022. "Efficient temporal flow Transformer accompanied with multi-head probsparse self-attention mechanism for remaining useful life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Zhuang, Liangliang & Xu, Ancha & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "A prognostic driven predictive maintenance framework based on Bayesian deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    17. Youdao Wang & Yifan Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Scale Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Chen, Jiaxian & Li, Dongpeng & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Zhuyun & Li, Weihua, 2023. "Aero-engine remaining useful life prediction method with self-adaptive multimodal data fusion and cluster-ensemble transfer regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Zhang, Yuru & Su, Chun & Wu, Jiajun & Liu, Hao & Xie, Mingjiang, 2024. "Trend-augmented and temporal-featured Transformer network with multi-sensor signals for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:237:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023002478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.