IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v183y2019icp240-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Listou Ellefsen, André
  • Bjørlykhaug, Emil
  • Æsøy, Vilmar
  • Ushakov, Sergey
  • Zhang, Houxiang

Abstract

In recent years, research has proposed several deep learning (DL) approaches to providing reliable remaining useful life (RUL) predictions in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) applications. Although supervised DL techniques, such as Convolutional Neural Network and Long-Short Term Memory, have outperformed traditional prognosis algorithms, they are still dependent on large labeled training datasets. With respect to real-life PHM applications, high-quality labeled training data might be both challenging and time-consuming to acquire. Alternatively, unsupervised DL techniques introduce an initial pre-training stage to extract degradation related features from raw unlabeled training data automatically. Thus, the combination of unsupervised and supervised (semi-supervised) learning has the potential to provide high RUL prediction accuracy even with reduced amounts of labeled training data. This paper investigates the effect of unsupervised pre-training in RUL predictions utilizing a semi-supervised setup. Additionally, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach is applied in order to tune the diverse amount of hyper-parameters in the training procedure. The advantages of the proposed semi-supervised setup have been verified on the popular C-MAPSS dataset. The experimental study, compares this approach to purely supervised training, both when the training data is completely labeled and when the labeled training data is reduced, and to the most robust results in the literature. The results suggest that unsupervised pre-training is a promising feature in RUL predictions subjected to multiple operating conditions and fault modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Listou Ellefsen, André & Bjørlykhaug, Emil & Æsøy, Vilmar & Ushakov, Sergey & Zhang, Houxiang, 2019. "Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 240-251.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:240-251
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018307506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yifan & Shao, Haonan & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "A novel dual attention mechanism combined with knowledge for remaining useful life prediction based on gated recurrent units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Marcin Witczak & Marcin Mrugalski & Bogdan Lipiec, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of MOSFETs via the Takagi–Sugeno Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Liu, Lu & Song, Xiao & Zhou, Zhetao, 2022. "Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Zhang, Jiusi & Li, Xiang & Tian, Jilun & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2023. "An integrated multi-head dual sparse self-attention network for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Yaping Li & Enrico Zio & Ershun Pan, 2021. "An MEWMA-based segmental multivariate hidden Markov model for degradation assessment and prediction," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(5), pages 831-844, October.
    8. Zhuang, Jichao & Jia, Minping & Ding, Yifei & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Temporal convolution-based transferable cross-domain adaptation approach for remaining useful life estimation under variable failure behaviors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Khaled Akkad & David He, 2023. "A dynamic mode decomposition based deep learning technique for prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2207-2224, June.
    10. Nadire Cavus & Yakubu Bala Mohammed & Mohammed Nasiru Yakubu, 2021. "An Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Prediction of Parameters Affecting Sustainable Growth of Mobile Banking Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Zhuang, Liangliang & Xu, Ancha & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "A prognostic driven predictive maintenance framework based on Bayesian deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Ma, Rui & Yang, Tao & Breaz, Elena & Li, Zhongliang & Briois, Pascal & Gao, Fei, 2018. "Data-driven proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation predication through deep learning method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 102-115.
    14. Fu, Song & Lin, Lin & Wang, Yue & Guo, Feng & Zhao, Minghang & Zhong, Baihong & Zhong, Shisheng, 2024. "MCA-DTCN: A novel dual-task temporal convolutional network with multi-channel attention for first prediction time detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Xiaojia Wang & Ting Huang & Keyu Zhu & Xibin Zhao, 2022. "LSTM-Based Broad Learning System for Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Zhou, Kai-Li & Cheng, De-Jun & Zhang, Han-Bing & Hu, Zhong-tai & Zhang, Chun-Yan, 2023. "Deep learning-based intelligent multilevel predictive maintenance framework considering comprehensive cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Zhu, Yongmeng & Wu, Jiechang & Wu, Jun & Liu, Shuyong, 2022. "Dimensionality reduce-based for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools with multisensor fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    18. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Tang, Ting & Yuan, Huimei, 2022. "A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Feiyue Deng & Yan Bi & Yongqiang Liu & Shaopu Yang, 2021. "Deep-Learning-Based Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on a Multi-Scale Dilated Convolution Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:240-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.