IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v94y2009i1p2-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • van Noortwijk, J.M.

Abstract

This article surveys the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Since the introduction of the gamma process in the area of reliability in 1975, it has been increasingly used to model stochastic deterioration for optimising maintenance. Because gamma processes are well suited for modelling the temporal variability of deterioration, they have proven to be useful in determining optimal inspection and maintenance decisions. An overview is given of the rich theoretical aspects as well as the successful maintenance applications of gamma processes. The statistical properties of the gamma process as a probabilistic stress–strength model are given and put in a historic perspective. Furthermore, methods for estimation, approximation, and simulation of gamma processes are reviewed. Finally, an extensive catalogue of inspection and maintenance models under gamma-process deterioration is presented with the emphasis on engineering applications.

Suggested Citation

  • van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:1:p:2-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007001111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Noortwijk, Jan M. & Cooke, Roger M. & Kok, Matthijs, 1995. "A Bayesian failure model based on isotropic deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 270-282, April.
    2. Dufresne, François & Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S. W., 1991. "Risk Theory with the Gamma Process," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 177-192, November.
    3. Crowder, Martin & Lawless, Jerald, 2007. "On a scheme for predictive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1713-1722, February.
    4. Mohamed Abdel-Hameed, 1984. "Life Distribution Properties of Devices Subject to a Lévy Wear Process," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 606-614, November.
    5. Basu, A. P. & Ebrahimi, Nader, 1983. "On the reliability of stochastic systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 1(5), pages 265-267, August.
    6. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    7. Zuckerman, Dror, 1978. "Optimal replacement policy for the case where the damage process is a one-sided Lévy process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 141-151, June.
    8. W Wang & P A Scarf & M A J Smith, 2000. "On the application of a model of condition-based maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(11), pages 1218-1227, November.
    9. R. J. Moore, 1982. "Derivatives of the Incomplete Gamma Integral," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(3), pages 330-335, November.
    10. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    11. Nader Ebrahimi & T. Ramallingam, 1993. "Estimation of system reliability in Brownian stress-strength models based on sample paths," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 45(1), pages 9-19, March.
    12. J. M. Bernardo, 1976. "Psi (Digamma) Function," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 25(3), pages 315-317, November.
    13. Sanjib Basu & Rama Lingham, 2003. "Bayesian estimation of system reliability in Brownian stress-strength models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 55(1), pages 7-19, March.
    14. Nader Ebrahimi, 2004. "Indirect assessment of the bivariate survival function," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(3), pages 435-448, September.
    15. Ishwaran, Hemant & James, Lancelot F., 2004. "Computational Methods for Multiplicative Intensity Models Using Weighted Gamma Processes: Proportional Hazards, Marked Point Processes, and Panel Count Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 175-190, January.
    16. Dieulle, L. & Berenguer, C. & Grall, A. & Roussignol, M., 2003. "Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 451-461, October.
    17. Austin J. Lemoine & Michael L. Wenocur, 1986. "Technical Note—A Note on Shot-Noise and Reliability Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 320-323, April.
    18. Dickson, David C. M. & Waters, Howard R., 1993. "Gamma Processes and Finite Time Survival Probabilities," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 259-272, November.
    19. X Jia & A H Christer, 2002. "A prototype cost model of functional check decisions in reliability-centred maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(12), pages 1380-1384, December.
    20. A-Hameed, M. S. & Proschan, F., 1973. "Nonstationary shock models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 383-404, October.
    21. Liao, Haitao & Elsayed, Elsayed A. & Chan, Ling-Yau, 2006. "Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 821-835, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Mao, Weijie, 2009. "A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 184-205, April.
    2. Guo, Chiming & Wang, Wenbin & Guo, Bo & Si, Xiaosheng, 2013. "A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented systems based on Wiener degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 183-194.
    3. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    5. Fauriat, William & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Optimization of an aperiodic sequential inspection and condition-based maintenance policy driven by value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Zhao, Xuejing & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe & Bordes, Laurent, 2010. "Condition-based inspection/replacement policies for non-monotone deteriorating systems with environmental covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 921-934.
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    8. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    9. van Noortwijk, J.M. & van der Weide, J.A.M. & Kallen, M.J. & Pandey, M.D., 2007. "Gamma processes and peaks-over-threshold distributions for time-dependent reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1651-1658.
    10. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    11. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    12. Wang, Xiaofei & Wang, Bing Xing & Hong, Yili & Jiang, Pei Hua, 2021. "Degradation data analysis based on gamma process with random effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1200-1208.
    13. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A. & Shemehsavar, S., 2020. "A dynamic auto-adaptive predictive maintenance policy for degradation with unknown parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 81-92.
    14. Chen, Nan & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhang, Linmiao, 2015. "Condition-based maintenance using the inverse Gaussian degradation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 190-199.
    15. Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
    16. Flage, Roger & Coit, David W. & Luxhøj, James T. & Aven, Terje, 2012. "Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    17. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    20. Ming-Yi You & Guang Meng, 2012. "A modularized framework for predictive maintenance scheduling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 380-391, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:1:p:2-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.