IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v59y2011i3p684-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa H. Elwany

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Nagi Z. Gebraeel

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Lisa M. Maillart

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

Abstract

Failure of many engineering systems usually results from a gradual and irreversible accumulation of damage, a degradation process. Most degradation processes can be monitored using sensor technology. The resulting degradation signals are usually correlated with the degradation process. A system is considered to have failed once its degradation signal reaches a prespecified failure threshold. This paper considers a replacement problem for components whose degradation process can be monitored using dedicated sensors. First, we present a stochastic degradation modeling framework that characterizes, in real time, the path of a component's degradation signal. These signals are used to predict the evolution of the component's degradation state. Next, we formulate a single-unit replacement problem as a Markov decision process and utilize the real-time signal observations to determine a replacement policy. We focus on exponentially increasing degradation signals and show that the optimal replacement policy for this class of problems is a monotonically nondecreasing control limit policy. Finally, the model is used to determine an optimal replacement policy by utilizing vibration-based degradation signals from a rotating machinery application.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:3:p:684-695
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1110.0912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0912
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1110.0912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Chiu, Kuo-Chang, 2002. "Optimal maintenance policy in a multistate deteriorating standby system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 689-698, September.
    2. Nicolai, Robin P. & Dekker, Rommert & van Noortwijk, Jan M., 2007. "A comparison of models for measurable deterioration: An application to coatings on steel structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1635-1650.
    3. Ciriaco Valdez‐Flores & Richard M. Feldman, 1989. "A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 419-446, August.
    4. C. Teresa Lam & R. H. Yeh, 1994. "Optimal replacement policies for multistate deteriorating systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 303-315, April.
    5. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    6. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    7. Dong, Ming & He, David, 2007. "Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 858-878, May.
    8. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    9. Edward P. C. Kao, 1973. "Optimal Replacement Rules when Changes of State are Semi-Markovian," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1231-1249, December.
    10. Kut C. So, 1992. "Optimality of control limit policies in replacement models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 685-697, August.
    11. Sheldon M. Ross, 1971. "Quality Control under Markovian Deterioration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(9), pages 587-596, May.
    12. Chen, Dongyan & Trivedi, Kishor S., 2005. "Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 25-29.
    13. Yeh, Ruey Huei, 1997. "Optimal inspection and replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 248-259, January.
    14. Liao, Haitao & Elsayed, Elsayed A. & Chan, Ling-Yau, 2006. "Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 821-835, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    3. Guo, Chiming & Wang, Wenbin & Guo, Bo & Si, Xiaosheng, 2013. "A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented systems based on Wiener degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 183-194.
    4. Yi Ding & Anatoly Lisnianski & Ilia Frenkel & Lev Khvatskin, 2009. "Optimal corrective maintenance contract planning for aging multi‐state system," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 612-631, September.
    5. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    6. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    8. Ramin Moghaddass & Şeyda Ertekin, 2018. "Joint optimization of ordering and maintenance with condition monitoring data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 271-310, April.
    9. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    10. Maria Chiara Magnanini & Tullio Tolio, 2020. "Switching- and hedging- point policy for preventive maintenance with degrading machines: application to a two-machine line," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 241-271, June.
    11. Chen, Nan & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhang, Linmiao, 2015. "Condition-based maintenance using the inverse Gaussian degradation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 190-199.
    12. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    13. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Wooseung Jang & J. George Shanthikumar, 2002. "Stochastic allocation of inspection capacity to competitive processes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 78-94, February.
    15. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    16. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    18. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    19. David T. Abdul‐Malak & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Lisa M. Maillart, 2019. "Maintaining systems with heterogeneous spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 485-501, September.
    20. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:3:p:684-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.