IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v231y2023ics0951832022006470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and availability artificial intelligence models for predicting blast-induced ground vibration intensity in open-pit mines to ensure the safety of the surroundings

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Hoang
  • Bui, Xuan-Nam
  • Topal, Erkan

Abstract

This study aims to predict ground vibration intensity in mine blasting, which is measured by peak particle velocity (PPV), using three novel intelligent models based on metaheuristic algorithms and extreme learning machine (ELM) model, including salp swarm optimization (SalSO), sparrow search optimization (SpaSO), and moth-flame optimization (MFO), named as SpaSO-ELM, SalSO-ELM, and MFO-ELM models. In this study, the SpaSO, SalSO and MFO algorithms were utilized to optimize the weights of the ELM for predicting PPV based on their different optimization mechanisms. In order to assess the performance of these models, 216 blasting records were considered and the corresponding PPV values were measured at the Coc Sau open-pit coal mine (located in the North of Vietnam). The algorithms’ parameters were structured with different activation functions of the ELM model. Furthermore, in order to diagnose the improvement of the SpaSO-ELM, SalSO-ELM, and MFO-ELM models, the standalone ELM and two empirical models (linear and nonlinear models) were also investigated and evaluated. The results revealed that nonlinear models are potential candidates for predicting PPV, and the ELM-based models are robust solutions to model the nonlinear relationships of the dataset. The developed models were then also validated in practical engineering, and the findings indicated that the SpaSO-ELM model is the best intelligent model for predicting PPV in this study with an accuracy of 91.4%. The remaining hybrid models provided slightly lower performances with the accuracies in the range of 89.8%—90.5%. Although the nonlinear empirical model predicted PPV much better than the linear model; its performance is still significantly lower than the proposed hybrid intelligent models. Thus, the optimized metaheuristic-based ELM models proposed in this study are considered as the high reliability models for predicting blast-induced ground vibration intensity in open-pit mines to ensure the safety of the surroundings.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Hoang & Bui, Xuan-Nam & Topal, Erkan, 2023. "Reliability and availability artificial intelligence models for predicting blast-induced ground vibration intensity in open-pit mines to ensure the safety of the surroundings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:231:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.109032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022006470
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.109032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xiaolei & Nguyen, Hoang & Bui, Xuan-Nam, 2021. "Exploring the relation between production factors, ore grades, and life of mine for forecasting mining capital cost through a novel cascade forward neural network-based salp swarm optimization model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Yong, Weixun & Zhang, Wengang & Nguyen, Hoang & Bui, Xuan-Nam & Choi, Yosoon & Nguyen-Thoi, Trung & Zhou, Jian & Tran, Trung Tin, 2022. "Analysis and prediction of diaphragm wall deflection induced by deep braced excavations using finite element method and artificial neural network optimized by metaheuristic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Seo, Seung-Kwon & Yoon, Young-Gak & Lee, Ju-sung & Na, Jonggeol & Lee, Chul-Jin, 2022. "Deep Neural Network-based Optimization Framework for Safety Evacuation Route during Toxic Gas Leak Incidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    4. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping & Cui, Xiaoyu, 2022. "An artificial neural network supported Wiener process based reliability estimation method considering individual difference and measurement error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    5. Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra, 2019. "Significant wave height forecasting via an extreme learning machine model integrated with improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 281-295.
    6. Gerassis, S. & Albuquerque, M.T.D. & García, J.F. & Boente, C. & Giráldez, E. & Taboada, J. & Martín, J.E., 2019. "Understanding complex blasting operations: A structural equation model combining Bayesian networks and latent class clustering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 195-204.
    7. Marks, Nicholas A & Stewart, Mark G. & Netherton, Michael D. & Stirling, Chris G., 2021. "Airblast variability and fatality risks from a VBIED in a complex urban environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Stewart, Mark G. & Netherton, Michael D., 2019. "A probabilistic risk-acceptance model for assessing blast and fragmentation safety hazards," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Yang, Zhe & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for fault detection in multi-component systems based on sparse autoencoder-based deep neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhuyan, Kasturi & Sharma, Hrishikesh, 2024. "Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimate for NRC and UHSC panels subjected to contact blast," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Jiadong, Qiu & Ohl, Joy P. & Tran, Trung-Tin, 2024. "Predicting clay compressibility for foundation design with high reliability and safety: A geotechnical engineering perspective using artificial neural network and five metaheuristic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Li, Bokang & Afkhami, Payam & Khayamim, Razieh & Elmi, Zeinab & Moses, Ren & Sobanjo, John & Ozguven, Eren E. & Dulebenets, Maxim A., 2024. "A holistic optimization-based approach for sustainable selection of level crossings for closure with safety, economic, and environmental considerations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Li, Qilin & Wang, Yang & Chen, Wensu & Li, Ling & Hao, Hong, 2024. "Machine learning prediction of BLEVE loading with graph neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kishore, Katchalla Bala & Gangolu, Jaswanth & Ramancha, Mukesh K. & Bhuyan, Kasturi & Sharma, Hrishikesh, 2022. "Performance-based probabilistic deflection capacity models and fragility estimation for reinforced concrete column and beam subjected to blast loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Xiang, Yong & Deo, Ravinesh C., 2020. "Near real-time significant wave height forecasting with hybridized multiple linear regression algorithms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Chen, Chuanhai & Li, Bowen & Guo, Jinyan & Liu, Zhifeng & Qi, Baobao & Hua, Chunlei, 2022. "Bearing life prediction method based on the improved FIDES reliability model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Yunyang & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2022. "Consistency regularization-based deep polynomial chaos neural network method for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Khakzad, Nima, 2023. "A methodology based on Dijkstra's algorithm and mathematical programming for optimal evacuation in process plants in the event of major tank fires," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Coraça, Eduardo M. & Ferreira, Janito V. & Nóbrega, Eurípedes G.O., 2023. "An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on Variational Autoencoders and Hidden Markov Models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Khan, Zulfiqar Ahmad & Khan, Shabbir Ahmad & Hussain, Tanveer & Baik, Sung Wook, 2024. "DSPM: Dual sequence prediction model for efficient energy management in micro-grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    9. Zheng, Shuwen & Wang, Chong & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Jie, 2024. "Fault detection in complex mechatronic systems by a hierarchical graph convolution attention network based on causal paths," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Braga, Joaquim A.P. & Andrade, António R., 2021. "Multivariate statistical aggregation and dimensionality reduction techniques to improve monitoring and maintenance in railways: The wheelset component," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Liu, Wenli & Li, Ang & Fang, Weili & Love, Peter E.D. & Hartmann, Timo & Luo, Hanbin, 2023. "A hybrid data-driven model for geotechnical reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Gao, Ruobin & Li, Ruilin & Hu, Minghui & Suganthan, Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Dynamic ensemble deep echo state network for significant wave height forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    13. Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Xiang, Yong & Jamei, Mehdi & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2023. "Ensemble robust local mean decomposition integrated with random forest for short-term significant wave height forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 731-746.
    14. Wang, Huaizhi & Xue, Wenli & Liu, Yitao & Peng, Jianchun & Jiang, Hui, 2020. "Probabilistic wind power forecasting based on spiking neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Yuchen Zhang & Zhenquan Zhang & Jun Wang & Jian Qin & Shuting Huang & Gang Xue & Yanjun Liu, 2024. "Research on Excitation Estimation for Ocean Wave Energy Generators Based on Extended Kalman Filtering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Zhao, Shuaiyu & Duan, Yiling & Roy, Nitin & Zhang, Bin, 2024. "A deep learning methodology based on adaptive multiscale CNN and enhanced highway LSTM for industrial process fault diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    17. Elham M. Al-Ali & Yassine Hajji & Yahia Said & Manel Hleili & Amal M. Alanzi & Ali H. Laatar & Mohamed Atri, 2023. "Solar Energy Production Forecasting Based on a Hybrid CNN-LSTM-Transformer Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Li, Bo & Zhang, Qiling & Yang, Shengmei & Tian, Yaling & Li, Zhi, 2023. "Identification of failure modes and paths of reservoir dams under explosion loads," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Daniel Clemente & Felipe Teixeira-Duarte & Paulo Rosa-Santos & Francisco Taveira-Pinto, 2023. "Advancements on Optimization Algorithms Applied to Wave Energy Assessment: An Overview on Wave Climate and Energy Resource," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-28, June.
    20. Jiadong, Qiu & Ohl, Joy P. & Tran, Trung-Tin, 2024. "Predicting clay compressibility for foundation design with high reliability and safety: A geotechnical engineering perspective using artificial neural network and five metaheuristic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:231:y:2023:i:c:s0951832022006470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.