IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics095183202300741x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting clay compressibility for foundation design with high reliability and safety: A geotechnical engineering perspective using artificial neural network and five metaheuristic algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jiadong, Qiu
  • Ohl, Joy P.
  • Tran, Trung-Tin

Abstract

This study aims at predicting clay compressibility (clay compressibility) for foundation design with unprecedented reliability and safety. To achieve this goal, we set forth several scientific objectives to enhance the accuracy of clay compressibility predictions and ensure the robustness of our models. Firstly, we explored an updated dataset comprising diverse clay types, focusing on the intricate relationship between clay compressibility and essential soil properties. By incorporating particle size distribution, the ratio between liquid limit (wLL) and plasticity index (PI), and the ratio between void ratio (eLL) and wLL, our objective was to gain a comprehensive understanding of clay behavior, facilitating more accurate predictions. Secondly, we employed Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) as our primary modeling tool. ANNs, with their capacity to discern complex patterns within data, formed the foundation of our predictive model. Our scientific objective was to harness the power of ANNs to capture subtle relationships among input variables, thereby ensuring a robust foundation for clay compressibility predictions. To further refine our predictions, our third objective was to optimize the ANN model. We utilized five distinct metaheuristic algorithms—Bird Swarm Algorithm (BSA), Dragonfly Optimization (DO), Elephant Herding Optimization (EHO), Jaya Algorithm (JA), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). Our aim was to fine-tune the ANN model's parameters using these algorithms, capitalizing on their strengths to achieve superior predictive performance. Additionally, our study aimed to pioneer the development and evaluation of hybrid models for forecasting clay compressibility. By integrating the ANN model with the metaheuristic algorithms (BSA-ANN, DO-ANN, EHO-ANN, JA-ANN, and WOA-ANN), our objective was to create hybrid frameworks that synergistically combined the strengths of both approaches. We rigorously evaluated these hybrid models, ensuring their efficacy and reliability in practical engineering applications. Crucially, we validated our models through practical engineering scenarios. For this purpose, we prepared 30 new soil samples mirroring real-world conditions. Our objective was to apply the developed models to these samples, affirming their effectiveness and reliability in actual foundation design applications. In pursuit of identifying the most accurate and reliable predictive model, our final objective focused on the BSA-ANN model. Remarkably, this model demonstrated an exceptional accuracy of 99.8%. Our objective was to establish the BSA-ANN model as the preferred choice for practical engineering applications, ensuring high reliability and safety in foundation design.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiadong, Qiu & Ohl, Joy P. & Tran, Trung-Tin, 2024. "Predicting clay compressibility for foundation design with high reliability and safety: A geotechnical engineering perspective using artificial neural network and five metaheuristic algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300741x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202300741X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s095183202300741x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.