IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v165y2017icp445-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology used for the development of an Air Traffic Management functional system architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Santos, Paula Luisa Costa Teixeira
  • Monteiro, Paulo Adelino Antunes
  • Studic, Milena
  • Majumdar, Arnab

Abstract

The Air Traffic Management (ATM) system provides a safe, economical, efficient, dynamic and integrated management of air traffic and airspace through the collaborative integration of humans, infrastructure (technology and facilities) and organisations. At present, it is widely accepted that the ATM system is one of the leading complex socio-technical systems in terms safety performance. To maintain this reputation, safety management of the ATM system needs to be able to cope with not only rising travel demand, but also the increased automation, the tighter coupling between its component elements and greater complexity of the ATM system itself. As a way of ensuring this, in Europe the European Union Regulation 1035/2011 requires the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) responsible for the provision of ATM, to describe and model their systems by accounting for the functional interactions between the equipment, procedures and human resources of the ATM system. However, despite the number of available models of the ATM system, none of them meets this requirement. Typically the existing models focus on the technical functions and describe the system usage via operational scenarios. Therefore this paper proposes a novel methodology used for the development of a functional system architecture−Model of ATM Reality In Action (MARIA)−with the aim to provide a sound base for system analysis, including safety, namely by describing the whole system and the interdependencies between its functions. By overcoming the limitations of the existing models MARIA has the potential to improve understanding of the ATM services safety, system resilience and meet the requirements of the Regulation 1035/2011. Lastly, the methodology applied in the ATM domain presented in this paper is equally transferable to systemic modelling of other complex socio-technical systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Santos, Paula Luisa Costa Teixeira & Monteiro, Paulo Adelino Antunes & Studic, Milena & Majumdar, Arnab, 2017. "A methodology used for the development of an Air Traffic Management functional system architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 445-457.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:445-457
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016308900
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herrera, I.A. & Woltjer, R., 2010. "Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1269-1275.
    2. Woltjer, Rogier & Pinska-Chauvin, Ella & Laursen, Tom & Josefsson, Billy, 2015. "Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 115-130.
    3. Leveson, Nancy, 2015. "A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 17-34.
    4. Anthony Onwuegbuzie & Nancy Leech, 2007. "Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 233-249, April.
    5. Felici, Massimo, 2006. "Capturing emerging complex interactions: Safety analysis in air traffic management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(12), pages 1482-1493.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patriarca, Riccardo & Bergström, Johan & Di Gravio, Giulio, 2017. "Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 34-46.
    2. Wu, Chao & Huang, Lang, 2019. "A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-85.
    3. Khastgir, Siddartha & Brewerton, Simon & Thomas, John & Jennings, Paul, 2021. "Systems Approach to Creating Test Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    5. Antonovsky, A. & Pollock, C. & Straker, L., 2016. "System reliability as perceived by maintenance personnel on petroleum production facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 58-65.
    6. Kaya, Gulsum Kubra & Hocaoglu, Mehmet Fatih, 2020. "Semi-quantitative application to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method for supporting safety management in a complex health-care process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Raben, Ditte Caroline & Viskum, Birgit & Mikkelsen, Kim L. & Hounsgaard, Jeanette & Bogh, Søren Bie & Hollnagel, Erik, 2018. "Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Seyyed Ostovar-Namaghi & Maryam Gholami, 2018. "Exploring Language Teachers’ Perceptions of Cyclical Presentation of Materials in an EFL Context: A Grounded Theory," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-60, March.
    9. Faiella, Giuliana & Parand, Anam & Franklin, Bryony Dean & Chana, Prem & Cesarelli, Mario & Stanton, Neville A. & Sevdalis, Nick, 2018. "Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-126.
    10. Sven Ivens & Monika Oberle, 2020. "Does Scientific Evaluation Matter? Improving Digital Simulation Games by Design-Based Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Berner, Christine Louise & Flage, Roger, 2017. "Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 10-19.
    12. Yoon, Young Sik & Ham, Dong-Han & Yoon, Wan Chul, 2016. "Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 22-34.
    13. Hassan Raza, 2018. "Participatory action research: working beyond disaster toward prevention," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 117-131, March.
    14. Ahmad Dehghan Nejad & Amirhosein Bahramzadeh, 2021. "The competency of organizational safety control structure; a framework for evaluation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1180-1198, December.
    15. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    16. Caspar, Sienna & Phinney, Alison & Spenceley, Shannon & Ratner, Pam, 2020. "Creating cultures of care: exploring the social organization of care delivery in long-term care homes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106220, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Jintao Liu & Keping Li & Wei Zheng & Jiebei Zhu, 2019. "An importance order analysis method for causes of railway signaling system hazards based on complex networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 567-579, August.
    18. Read, G.J.M. & Naweed, A. & Salmon, P.M., 2019. "Complexity on the rails: A systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 352-365.
    19. Steen, Riana & Ferreira, Pedro, 2020. "Resilient flood-risk management at the municipal level through the lens of the Functional Resonance Analysis Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Rosario Vázquez-Carrasco & Ma. López-Pérez & Edgar Centeno, 2012. "A qualitative approach to the challenges for women in management: are they really starting in the 21st century?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1337-1357, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:165:y:2017:i:c:p:445-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.