IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v116y2017icp137-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The current status of the consumer electronics repair industry in the U.S.: A survey-based study

Author

Listed:
  • Sabbaghi, Mostafa
  • Cade, Willie
  • Behdad, Sara
  • Bisantz, Ann M.

Abstract

Consumer electronics are turning into consumable devices nowadays, and consumers generally show little inclination to repair broken products due to the lack of repair infrastructures and relative high repair costs. On the other hand, technical, operational, and economic barriers impede the growth of repair businesses. In this paper, we provide a look into the repair industry through an analysis of a survey conducted by a third-party repair service provider. 2170 repair technicians have participated in a survey consisting of 23 questions about repair challenges in their profession. At first, we take a look at the economic barriers that dissuade consumers from repairing products. Next, a demand-based repair service pricing framework is introduced. The optimal pricing levels are found based on the consumers’ repair demand. Finally, other aspects of repair businesses, e.g. repairability degree of consumer electronics and consumer expectations of repair services, are thoroughly investigated. As an example of findings, different types of consumer electronics are clustered based on the associated repair difficulties. Moreover, some insights are provided to promote the repair businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Cade, Willie & Behdad, Sara & Bisantz, Ann M., 2017. "The current status of the consumer electronics repair industry in the U.S.: A survey-based study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:116:y:2017:i:c:p:137-151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916302464
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Estrada-Ayub, Jesús. A. & Kahhat, Ramzy, 2014. "Decision factors for e-waste in Northern Mexico: To waste or trade," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 93-106.
    2. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Esmaeilian, Behzad & Cade, Willie & Wiens, Kyle & Behdad, Sara, 2016. "Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey-based study of consumer repair experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 114-122.
    3. Huber, Sebastian & Spinler, Stefan, 2012. "Pricing of full-service repair contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 113-121.
    4. Krystofik, Mark & Wagner, Jeffrey & Gaustad, Gabrielle, 2015. "Leveraging intellectual property rights to encourage green product design and remanufacturing for sustainable waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 44-54.
    5. Kissling, Ramon & Fitzpatrick, Colin & Boeni, Heinz & Luepschen, Claudia & Andrew, Stefan & Dickenson, John, 2012. "Definition of generic re-use operating models for electrical and electronic equipment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 85-99.
    6. Hu, Shuhan & Wen, Zongguo, 2015. "Why does the informal sector of end-of-life vehicle treatment thrive? A case study of China and lessons for developing countries in motorization process," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 91-99.
    7. Cox, Jayne & Griffith, Sarah & Giorgi, Sara & King, Geoff, 2013. "Consumer understanding of product lifetimes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-29.
    8. Heejung Ro, 2014. "Complaint, patience, and neglect: responses to a dissatisfying service experience," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(2), pages 197-216, June.
    9. Ardente, Fulvio & Mathieux, Fabrice & Recchioni, Marco, 2014. "Recycling of electronic displays: Analysis of pre-processing and potential ecodesign improvements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 158-171.
    10. Kahhat, Ramzy & Williams, Eric, 2012. "Materials flow analysis of e-waste: Domestic flows and exports of used computers from the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-74.
    11. Daniela K. Rosner & Fred Turner, 2015. "Theaters of Alternative Industry: Hobbyist Repair Collectives and the Legacy of the 1960s American Counterculture," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 59-69, Springer.
    12. Cheung, Wai Ming & Pachisia, Vedant, 2015. "Facilitating waste paper recycling and repurposing via cost modelling of machine failure, labour availability and waste quantity," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 34-41.
    13. Milovantseva, Natalia & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2015. "Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 170-177.
    14. Okada, Erica Mina, 2001. "Trade-Ins, Mental Accounting, and Product Replacement Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(4), pages 433-446, March.
    15. Glickman, Theodore S. & Xu, Feng, 2008. "The distribution of the product of two triangular random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2821-2826, November.
    16. John McCollough, 2010. "Consumer Discount Rates and the Decision to Repair or Replace a Durable Product: A Sustainable Consumption Issue," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 183-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renske van den Berge & Lise Magnier & Ruth Mugge, 2023. "Until death do us part? In‐depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 908-922, June.
    2. Ines Güsser-Fachbach & Gernot Lechner & Tomás B. Ramos & Marc Reimann, 2023. "Repair service convenience in a circular economy: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2023-01, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milovantseva, Natalia & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2015. "Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 170-177.
    2. Munten, Pauline & Vanhamme, Joëlle, 2023. "To reduce waste, have it repaired! The quality signaling effect of product repairability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    4. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Esmaeilian, Behzad & Cade, Willie & Wiens, Kyle & Behdad, Sara, 2016. "Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey-based study of consumer repair experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 114-122.
    5. An, Da & Yang, Yu & Chai, Xilong & Xi, Beidou & Dong, Lichun & Ren, Jingzheng, 2015. "Mitigating pollution of hazardous materials from WEEE of China: Portfolio selection for a sustainable future based on multi-criteria decision making," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 198-210.
    6. Ines Güsser-Fachbach & Gernot Lechner & Tomás B. Ramos & Marc Reimann, 2023. "Repair service convenience in a circular economy: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2023-01, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    7. Shi, Jingjing & Li, Qiang & Li, Huiquan & Li, Shaopeng & Zhang, Jianbo & Shi, Yao, 2017. "Eco-design for recycled products: Rejuvenating mullite from coal fly ash," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 67-73.
    8. Davis, John-Michael & Garb, Yaakov, 2015. "A model for partnering with the informal e-waste industry: Rationale, principles and a case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 73-83.
    9. Chadwick J. Miller & Daniel C. Brannon & Jim Salas & Martha Troncoza, 2021. "Advertising, incentives, and the upsell: how advertising differentially moderates customer- vs. retailer-directed price incentives’ impact on consumers’ preferences for premium products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1043-1064, November.
    10. Prieto, Marc & Caemmerer, Barbara & Baltas, George, 2015. "Using a hedonic price model to test prospect theory assertions: The asymmetrical and nonlinear effect of reliability on used car prices," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 206-212.
    11. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    12. Manomaivibool, Panate & Vassanadumrongdee, Sujitra, 2012. "Buying back household waste electrical and electronic equipment: Assessing Thailand's proposed policy in light of past disposal behavior and future preferences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 117-125.
    13. Myriam Ertz & Jonathan Deschênes & Emine Sarigöllü, 2021. "From User to Provider: Switching Over in the Collaborative Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Behdad, Sara & Zhuang, Jun, 2016. "Managing consumer behavior toward on-time return of the waste electrical and electronic equipment: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 545-563.
    15. Eva Delacroix & Valérie Guillard, 2018. "Qu’est-ce que gaspiller un objet pour les consommateurs ? Triangulation des méthodes pour définir et conceptualiser le gaspillage des objets," Post-Print hal-01824756, HAL.
    16. Miller, Michael & Mattes, Katharina, 2014. "Demonstration of a multi-criteria based decision support framework for selecting PSS to increase resource efficiency," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S11/2014, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    17. Yoshida, Aya & Terazono, Atsushi & Ballesteros, Florencio C. & Nguyen, Duc-Quang & Sukandar, Sunandar & Kojima, Michikazu & Sakata, Shozo, 2016. "E-waste recycling processes in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam: A case study of cathode ray tube TVs and monitors," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 48-58.
    18. García-Torres, Samy & Kahhat, Ramzy & Santa-Cruz, Sandra, 2017. "Methodology to characterize and quantify debris generation in residential buildings after seismic events," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 151-159.
    19. Agamuthu, P. & Kasapo, Pearson & Mohd Nordin, Nurul Ain, 2015. "E-waste flow among selected institutions of higher learning using material flow analysis model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 177-185.
    20. Paul Dolan & Robert Metcalfe, 2008. "Comparing Willingness-to-Pay and Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Non-Market Goods," CEP Discussion Papers dp0890, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:116:y:2017:i:c:p:137-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.