IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v100y2015icp21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact

Author

Listed:
  • Diyamandoglu, Vasil
  • Fortuna, Lorena M.

Abstract

Deconstruction is the process of disassembling a physical structure to its components in reverse order to that used during construction with minimum damage so that they maintain their original physical properties and structural integrity. In the United States single family houses are constructed of wood frames. Deconstruction is increasingly considered a viable option to demolition in the removal of such buildings. The study reported herein analysis the reduction in GHG emissions and energy savings of recovering the reusable material for the purpose of resale, as a whole and in increments, to that of terminal disposal (landfilling). The analysis examined the following scenarios: (a) current practice in the US, (b) current practice in the European Union, (c) maximum reuse (all recovered materials will be reused), (d) maximum recycling (all recovered materials will be recycled—no reuse), and (e) soft-stripping reuse (only the material that were collected during soft-stripping will be reused, all else will be recycled), using the Waste Reduction Model. The reduction in greenhouse gas emission in the maximum recycling scenario was the highest observed across all scenarios. Soft-stripped materials saved more energy than recycling and contributed to nearly half of the resale value of salvaged materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Diyamandoglu, Vasil & Fortuna, Lorena M., 2015. "Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915000841
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brogaard, Line K. & Damgaard, Anders & Jensen, Morten B. & Barlaz, Morton & Christensen, Thomas H., 2014. "Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 30-45.
    2. Themelis, Nickolas J. & Ulloa, Priscilla A., 2007. "Methane generation in landfills," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1243-1257.
    3. Vergara, Sintana E. & Damgaard, Anders & Horvath, Arpad, 2011. "Boundaries matter: Greenhouse gas emission reductions from alternative waste treatment strategies for California's municipal solid waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 87-97.
    4. Valentin Bellassen & Sebastiaan Luyssaert, 2014. "Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 153-155, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toniolo, Sara & Mazzi, Anna & Pieretto, Chiara & Scipioni, Antonio, 2017. "Allocation strategies in comparative life cycle assessment for recycling: Considerations from case studies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 249-261.
    2. Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Mahmud Ashraf, 2025. "Developing the conceptual framework for the key performance indicators for sustainable wood waste supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6921-6944, March.
    3. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Bin Lei & Wanying Yang & Yusong Yan & Zhuo Tang & Wenkui Dong, 2023. "Carbon Emission Reduction Evaluation of End-of-Life Buildings Based on Multiple Recycling Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Jianguo Chen & Yangyue Su & Hongyun Si & Jindao Chen, 2018. "Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Väntsi, Olli & Kärki, Timo, 2015. "Environmental assessment of recycled mineral wool and polypropylene utilized in wood polymer composites," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 38-48.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Marciniuk-Kluska & Mariusz Kluska, 2025. "Energy Recovery from Municipal Biodegradable Waste in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Reijnders, L., 2009. "Are forestation, bio-char and landfilled biomass adequate offsets for the climate effects of burning fossil fuels?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2839-2841, August.
    3. Hao, Xiaoli & Yang, Hongxing & Zhang, Guoqiang, 2008. "Trigeneration: A new way for landfill gas utilization and its feasibility in Hong Kong," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3662-3673, October.
    4. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 149-162.
    5. Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B. & Bonilla, Silvia H. & Sacomano, José B. & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2013. "Urban solid waste plant treatment in Brazil: Is there a net emergy yield on the recovered materials?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 143-155.
    6. Ho, Viet Hoang & Morita, Hidenori & Bachofer, Felix & Ho, Thanh Ha, 2025. "Enhanced aboveground biomass density estimation in Central Vietnamese forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    7. Uddin, Md Mosleh & Simson, Amanda & Wright, Mark Mba, 2020. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of dimethyl ether production via the bi-reforming pathway for transportation fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Marianne V. Asmussen & Rafael Rubilar & Daniel Bozo & Rosa M. Alzamora & Juan Pedro Elissetche & Matías Pincheira & Oscar Jara, 2025. "Relationship Between Carbon Stock and Stand Cumulative Production at Harvesting Age of Pinus radiata Plantations: A Comparison Between Granitic and Metamorphic Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Scarlat, N. & Motola, V. & Dallemand, J.F. & Monforti-Ferrario, F. & Mofor, Linus, 2015. "Evaluation of energy potential of Municipal Solid Waste from African urban areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1269-1286.
    10. El Hanandeh, Ali & El Zein, Abbas, 2011. "Are the aims of increasing the share of green electricity generation and reducing GHG emissions always compatible?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3031-3036.
    11. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.
    13. Liu, Yili & Xing, Peixuan & Liu, Jianguo, 2017. "Environmental performance evaluation of different municipal solid waste management scenarios in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 98-106.
    14. Turner, David A. & Williams, Ian D. & Kemp, Simon, 2015. "Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 186-197.
    15. Lund, Peter D., 2017. "Implications of Finland's plan to ban coal and cutting oil use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 78-80.
    16. Petros Ganatsas & Marianthi Tsakaldimi & Theodoros Karydopoulos & Lydia-Maria Petaloudi & Alexandros Papaemmanouil & Sotirios Papadopoulos & Sofia Gerochristou, 2022. "Carbon Pools in a 77 Year-Old Oak Forest under Conversion from Coppice to High Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Andrea Baranzini & Nicolas Borzykowski & Stefano Carattini, 2016. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes," GRI Working Papers 257, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    18. Christopher Coutts & Micah Hahn, 2015. "Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, August.
    19. Dusoruth, Vaneesha, "undated". "Household Food Waste Generation and Organics Recycling: Too Time Consuming or for the Better [Public] Good?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274132, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Du, Mingxi & Peng, Changhui & Wang, Xiaoge & Chen, Huai & Wang, Meng & Zhu, Qiuan, 2017. "Quantification of methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills in China during the past decade," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 272-279.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.