IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025002285.html

Enhanced aboveground biomass density estimation in Central Vietnamese forests

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, Viet Hoang
  • Morita, Hidenori
  • Bachofer, Felix
  • Ho, Thanh Ha

Abstract

Accurate estimation of spatially explicit forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) is essential for supporting climate change mitigation strategies. Recent studies have demonstrated the predictive effectiveness of the random forest (RF) algorithm in forest AGBD estimation utilizing multi-source remote sensing (RS) data. However, the RF-based estimates may be further enhanced by integrating RF with kriging techniques that account for spatial autocorrelation in model residuals. Therefore, we investigated the performance of random forest ordinary kriging (RFOK) and random forest co-kriging (RFCK) for estimating AGBD in Central Vietnamese forests using Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar-2 (ALOS-2 PALSAR-2), Sentinel-1 (S1), and Sentinel-2 (S2) imageries. 277 predictors, including spectral bands, radar backscatter coefficients, vegetation indices, biophysical variables, and texture metrics, were derived from these RS datasets and statistically linked to field measurements from 104 geo-referenced forest inventory plots. The results showed that textures, modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index (MCARI), and radar backscatters were key contributors to AGBD variability. The fusion of ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 and S2 data yielded the highest RF performance, with coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) achieving 0.75, 39.15 t.ha-1, and 32.20 t.ha-1, respectively. Incorporating interpolated residuals by ordinary kriging and co-kriging into RF predictions enhanced estimation accuracy, with relative improvements of 5.74–7.04 % in R2, 8.73–10.91 % in RMSE, and 13.62–15.27 % in MAE, yet these gains remained limited. Although RFOK achieved marginally better accuracy (R2 = 0.80, RMSE = 34.88 t.ha-1, MAE = 27.28 t.ha-1) compared to RFCK (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 35.73 t.ha-1, MAE = 27.81 t.ha-1), the latter reduced estimation bias more effectively, likely due to the inclusion of elevation as a covariate in the co-kriging process. These findings underscore the potential of the hybrid RF-kriging frameworks for improving spatial AGBD estimation, offering a robust approach for carbon accounting in tropical ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, Viet Hoang & Morita, Hidenori & Bachofer, Felix & Ho, Thanh Ha, 2025. "Enhanced aboveground biomass density estimation in Central Vietnamese forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002285
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002285
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentin Bellassen & Sebastiaan Luyssaert, 2014. "Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 153-155, February.
    2. Ge Shi & Yutong Wang & Jingran Zhang & Jinghai Xu & Yu Chen & Wei Chen & Jiahang Liu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Analysis and Prediction of Carbon Storage Based on Land Use and Cover Change: A Case Study of Jiangsu Coastal Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Viana, H. & Aranha, J. & Lopes, D. & Cohen, Warren B., 2012. "Estimation of crown biomass of Pinus pinaster stands and shrubland above-ground biomass using forest inventory data, remotely sensed imagery and spatial prediction models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 22-35.
    4. Rongwei Li & Shucheng Tan & Mingfei Zhang & Shaohan Zhang & Haishan Wang & Lei Zhu, 2024. "Geological Disaster Susceptibility Evaluation Using a Random Forest Empowerment Information Quantity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Jose Manuel Monsalve-Tellez & Jorge Luis Torres-León & Yeison Alberto Garcés-Gómez, 2022. "Evaluation of SAR and Optical Image Fusion Methods in Oil Palm Crop Cover Classification Using the Random Forest Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Yutian Liang & Jiaqi Zeng & Shangqian Li, 2022. "Examining the Spatial Variations of Land Use Change and Its Impact Factors in a Coastal Area in Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diyamandoglu, Vasil & Fortuna, Lorena M., 2015. "Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Marianne V. Asmussen & Rafael Rubilar & Daniel Bozo & Rosa M. Alzamora & Juan Pedro Elissetche & Matías Pincheira & Oscar Jara, 2025. "Relationship Between Carbon Stock and Stand Cumulative Production at Harvesting Age of Pinus radiata Plantations: A Comparison Between Granitic and Metamorphic Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Sa’ad Ibrahim, 2022. "Improving Land Use/Cover Classification Accuracy from Random Forest Feature Importance Selection Based on Synergistic Use of Sentinel Data and Digital Elevation Model in Agriculturally Dominated Lands," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Manel Khlif & Maria José Escorihuela & Aicha Chahbi Bellakanji & Giovanni Paolini & Zeineb Kassouk & Zohra Lili Chabaane, 2023. "Multi-Year Cereal Crop Classification Model in a Semi-Arid Region Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat 7–8 Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Lund, Peter D., 2017. "Implications of Finland's plan to ban coal and cutting oil use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 78-80.
    7. Petros Ganatsas & Marianthi Tsakaldimi & Theodoros Karydopoulos & Lydia-Maria Petaloudi & Alexandros Papaemmanouil & Sotirios Papadopoulos & Sofia Gerochristou, 2022. "Carbon Pools in a 77 Year-Old Oak Forest under Conversion from Coppice to High Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Steen MAGNUSSEN, 2018. "An estimation strategy to protect against over-estimating precision in a LiDAR-based prediction of a stand mean," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 497-505.
    9. Andrea Baranzini & Nicolas Borzykowski & Stefano Carattini, 2016. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes," GRI Working Papers 257, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    10. Xia Zhou & Fengyu Cao, 2022. "Analysis of Economic Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Urban Construction Land in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei under Carbon Emission Constraints," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Christopher Coutts & Micah Hahn, 2015. "Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, August.
    12. Rory J. Layton & Rachel Horta Arduin & Haji Yazdeen & Regis Pommier & Guido Sonnemann, 2021. "Material Flow Analysis to Evaluate Supply Chain Evolution and Management: An Example Focused on Maritime Pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Liu, Ziheng & Lu, Qinan, 2024. "Carbon dioxide fertilization, carbon neutrality, and food security," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Akhlaq Amin Wani & Amir Farooq Bhat & Aaasif Ali Gatoo & Shiba Zahoor & Basira Mehraj & Naveed Najam & Qaisar Shafi Wani & M A Islam & Shah Murtaza & Moonisa Aslam Dervash & P K Joshi, 2021. "Assessing relationship of forest biophysical factors with NDVI for carbon management in key coniferous strata of temperate Himalayas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Graczyk, Dariusz & Pińskwar, Iwona & Choryński, Adam & Stasik, Rafał, 2024. "Less power when more is needed. Climate-related current and possible future problems of the wind energy sector in Poland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    16. Asitha De Silva & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh, 2022. "Green and Blue Infrastructure as Nature-Based Better Preparedness Solutions for Disaster Risk Reduction: Key Policy Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Magerl, Andreas & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Lauk, Christian & Roux, Nicolas & Gingrich, Simone, 2025. "Is decoupling enough to achieve the U.S. climate targets for agriculture and forestry? Historical greenhouse gas and biomass fluxes from AFOLU sector production in the United States, 1910–2022," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    18. Jean C. Bikomeye & Sima Namin & Chima Anyanwu & Caitlin S. Rublee & Jamie Ferschinger & Ken Leinbach & Patricia Lindquist & August Hoppe & Lawrence Hoffman & Justin Hegarty & Dwayne Sperber & Kirsten , 2021. "Resilience and Equity in a Time of Crises: Investing in Public Urban Greenspace Is Now More Essential Than Ever in the US and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-39, August.
    19. Kadukothanahally Nagaraju Shivaprakash & Niraj Swami & Sagar Mysorekar & Roshni Arora & Aditya Gangadharan & Karishma Vohra & Madegowda Jadeyegowda & Joseph M. Kiesecker, 2022. "Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Juan F. Fernández-Manjarrés & Paloma Ruiz-Benito & Miguel A. Zavala & J. Julio Camarero & Fernando Pulido & Vânia Proença & Laetitia Navarro & Roxane Sansilvestri & Elena Granda & Laura Marqués & Mart, 2018. "Forest Adaptation to Climate Change along Steep Ecological Gradients: The Case of the Mediterranean-Temperate Transition in South-Western Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.