IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v655y2024ics0378437124007076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the impact of zealots in a population of susceptible agents in a best-of-n problem within a heterogeneous network

Author

Listed:
  • Njougouo, Thierry
  • Reina, Andreagiovanni
  • Tuci, Elio
  • Carletti, Timoteo

Abstract

Both humans and social animals live in groups and are frequently forced to choose between options with different qualities. When there are no leader agents controlling the group decision, consensus can be achieved through repeated interactions among group members. Various studies on collective decision-making illustrate how the dynamics of the opinions are determined by the structure of the social network and the methods that individuals use to share and update their opinion upon a social interaction. In this paper, we are interested in further exploring how cognitive, social, and environmental factors interactively contribute to determining the outcome of a collective best-of-n decision process involving asymmetric options, i.e., different costs and/or benefits for each option. We propose and study a novel model capturing those different factors, (i) the cognitive load in processing social information, (ii) the number of zealots (i.e., asocial agents who never change their opinion), (iii) the option qualities, (iv) the social connectivity structure, and (v) the degree centrality of the asocial agents (i.e., the number of neighbours). By using the heterogeneous mean-field approach, we study the impact of the above-mentioned factors in the decision dynamics. Our findings indicate that when susceptible agents, i.e., individuals who change their opinion to conform with others, use the voter model as a mechanism to update their opinion, both the number and the degree of connectivity of the zealots can lead the population to converge towards the lowest quality option. Instead, when susceptible agents use methods demanding a larger cognitive cost (e.g., the majority rule), the group is marginally impacted by the presence of zealots. The results of the analytical model are complemented and extended by agent-based simulations. Our analysis also shows that the network topology can modulate the influence of zealots on group dynamics. In fact, in homogeneous networks where all nodes have the same degree, any location of the zealots has similar impact on the group dynamics. Instead, when the network is heterogeneous, our simulations confirm the model predictions showing that placing the zealots in the network hubs (nodes with several neighbours) has a much larger impact than placing them in lower-degree nodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Njougouo, Thierry & Reina, Andreagiovanni & Tuci, Elio & Carletti, Timoteo, 2024. "On the impact of zealots in a population of susceptible agents in a best-of-n problem within a heterogeneous network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 655(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:655:y:2024:i:c:s0378437124007076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.130198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437124007076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vega-Redondo,Fernando, 2007. "Complex Social Networks," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521674096, Enero-Abr.
    2. Elva J H Robinson & Nigel R Franks & Samuel Ellis & Saki Okuda & James A R Marshall, 2011. "A Simple Threshold Rule Is Sufficient to Explain Sophisticated Collective Decision-Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Böttcher, Lucas & Montealegre, Pedro & Goles, Eric & Gersbach, Hans, 2020. "Competing activists—Political polarization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    4. Jacob K. Goeree & Leeat Yariv, 2011. "An Experimental Study of Collective Deliberation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 893-921, May.
    5. David A. Siegel, 2009. "Social Networks and Collective Action," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 122-138, January.
    6. Vega-Redondo,Fernando, 2007. "Complex Social Networks," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521857406, Enero-Abr.
    7. Andreagiovanni Reina & Gabriele Valentini & Cristian Fernández-Oto & Marco Dorigo & Vito Trianni, 2015. "A Design Pattern for Decentralised Decision Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Goles, Eric & Medina, Pablo & Montealegre, Pedro & Santivañez, Julio, 2022. "Majority networks and consensus dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Masi, G. & Giovannetti, G. & Ricchiuti, G., 2013. "Network analysis to detect common strategies in Italian foreign direct investment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(5), pages 1202-1214.
    2. Andrea Galeotti & Brian W. Rogers, 2013. "Strategic Immunization and Group Structure," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Bargigli, Leonardo & Gallegati, Mauro, 2011. "Random digraphs with given expected degree sequences: A model for economic networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 396-411, May.
    4. Cabrales, Antonio & Calvó-Armengol, Antoni & Zenou, Yves, 2011. "Social interactions and spillovers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 339-360, June.
    5. Zenou, Yves, 2007. "Social Interactions and Labour Market Outcomes in Cities," CEPR Discussion Papers 6129, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Bravard, Christophe & Charroin, Liza & Touati, Corinne, 2017. "Optimal design and defense of networks under link attacks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 62-79.
    7. Florian Blöchl & Fabian J. Theis & Fernando Vega-Redondo & Eric O'N. Fisher, 2010. "Which Sectors of a Modern Economy are most Central?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3175, CESifo.
    8. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    9. Levent V. Orman, 2016. "Information markets over trust networks," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 529-551, December.
    10. Michael D. König & Xiaodong Liu & Yves Zenou, 2019. "R&D Networks: Theory, Empirics, and Policy Implications," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(3), pages 476-491, July.
    11. Galeotti, Andrea & Goyal, Sanjeev, 2007. "Network Multipliers and the Optimality of Indirect Communication," Economics Discussion Papers 2982, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    12. Mauro Napoletano & Stefano Battiston & Michael D König & Frank Schweitzer, 2008. "The efficiency and evolution of R&D Networks," Working Papers hal-01066189, HAL.
    13. Chang, Chia-ling & Chen, Shu-heng, 2011. "Interactions in DSGE models: The Boltzmann-Gibbs machine and social networks approach," Economics Discussion Papers 2011-25, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Cinara G. Ghedini & Carlos H. C. Ribeiro, 2014. "Improving Resilience Of Complex Networks Facing Attacks And Failures Through Adaptive Mechanisms," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 1-25.
    15. Cátia Batista & Marcel Fafchamps & Pedro C. Vicente, 2018. "Keep It Simple: A Field Experiment on Information Sharing in Social Networks," NBER Working Papers 24908, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Kets, W., 2008. "Beliefs in Network Games (Revised version of CentER DP 2007-46)," Other publications TiSEM a08e38fd-6b00-4233-94ce-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Fausto Bonacina & Marco D’Errico & Enrico Moretto & Silvana Stefani & Anna Torriero & Giovanni Zambruno, 2015. "A multiple network approach to corporate governance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1585-1595, July.
    18. Solomon Sorin & Golo Natasa, 2013. "Minsky Financial Instability, Interscale Feedback, Percolation and Marshall–Walras Disequilibrium," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 167-260, October.
    19. repec:ehu:ikerla:15005 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Zenou, Yves, 2011. "Spatial versus Social Mismatch: The Strength of Weak Ties," Research Papers in Economics 2011:5, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    21. Acemoglu, Daron & Malekian, Azarakhsh & Ozdaglar, Asu, 2016. "Network security and contagion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 536-585.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:655:y:2024:i:c:s0378437124007076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.