IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001742.html

The UNESCO Global Geopark model for sustainable development in marginalised areas: Investigating perceptions and social acceptance in a local context

Author

Listed:
  • Esengulova, Nazgul
  • Lopolito, Antonio
  • Pazienza, Pasquale
  • Lucia, Caterina De

Abstract

UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGPs) are increasingly recognized as a strategic tool to unlock sustainable development in marginalised areas. However, its effectiveness rests on its social acceptance by local stakeholders. To maximize its impact, targeted actions are needed to enhance the perceived value of UGGPs as a development tool and align them with local priorities. This paper addresses two key research questions: 1) How do local stakeholders perceive the UGGP model as a driver for development? 2) What actions can increase its social acceptance and integration into local strategies? Using a combined SWOT-SOr analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping approach, we investigate these questions through the Gargano region (Italy) case study. We found that UGGP-related initiatives are often viewed as secondary to more immediate economic concerns. However, local entrepreneurship and place-based knowledge emerge as key catalysts to bridge geoheritage conservation with tangible development outcomes. Strategic interventions, such as participatory governance, awareness campaigns, and policy integration, are essential to strengthen the UGGP’s legitimacy as a development tool. This study provides a transferable methodological framework to assess and enhance UGGP acceptance in diverse marginalised contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Esengulova, Nazgul & Lopolito, Antonio & Pazienza, Pasquale & Lucia, Caterina De, 2026. "The UNESCO Global Geopark model for sustainable development in marginalised areas: Investigating perceptions and social acceptance in a local context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001742
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.