IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v154y2025ics0264837725000651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping and prioritising landscape feature restoration in agricultural landscapes: A case study in Brandenburg, Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Schaan, Linn N.
  • Finch, Elizabeth A.
  • Wartenberg, Ariani C.
  • Boettner, Vincent S.
  • Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D.
  • Bonn, Aletta
  • Pe’er, Guy

Abstract

EU agricultural landscapes are vital for biodiversity. Intensive agricultural practices constitute, however, key drivers of biodiversity loss. The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 aims to restore “at least 10 % of agricultural area under high-diversity landscape features”, yet it lacks specific guidance for assessment and implementation. Here, we develop an approach to (a) map and assess agricultural landscape features (LF) cover at a landscape scale, (b) cluster agricultural landscapes by complexity using both compositional and configurational heterogeneity metrics, and (c) prioritise landscapes and sites for LF restoration by targeting areas of lower productivity and higher erosion risk, to enhance farmer acceptance and increase restoration benefits. Using Brandenburg, Germany, as a case study, we found that 94.4 % of landscapes fall short of the 10 % landscape features cover target. We categorised five agricultural landscape types ranging from simple to complex mosaics. At the local scale, in ten randomly selected landscapes, we identified an additional 11 % of agricultural areas on which LF could be restored. Our study helps advance methodologies to prioritise LF restoration. It can provide guidance for administrators and planners to assess the LF status and advance their adoption by farmers. We recommend prioritising landscapes and selecting restoration actions based on overall landscape complexity assessment. At the local scale, we recommend participatory processes involving local stakeholders. We believe our methodology is transferable to other EU regions, and highlights both the opportunities and challenges in developing a standardised, EU-wide approach for prioritising LF restoration to support agroecological transitions in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaan, Linn N. & Finch, Elizabeth A. & Wartenberg, Ariani C. & Boettner, Vincent S. & Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D. & Bonn, Aletta & Pe’er, Guy, 2025. "Mapping and prioritising landscape feature restoration in agricultural landscapes: A case study in Brandenburg, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andres Trujillo-Barrera & Joost M. E. Pennings & Dianne Hofenk, 2016. "Understanding producers' motives for adopting sustainable practices: the role of expected rewards, risk perception and risk tolerance," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(3), pages 359-382.
    2. le Clech, Solen & van Bussel, Lenny G.J. & Lof, Marjolein E. & de Knegt, Bart & Szentirmai, István & Andersen, Erling, 2024. "Effects of linear landscape elements on multiple ecosystem services in contrasting agricultural landscapes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Karolina Golicz & Gohar Ghazaryan & Wiebke Niether & Ariani C. Wartenberg & Lutz Breuer & Andreas Gattinger & Suzanne R. Jacobs & Till Kleinebecker & Philipp Weckenbrock & André Große-Stoltenberg, 2021. "The Role of Small Woody Landscape Features and Agroforestry Systems for National Carbon Budgeting in Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Roel Klink & Diana E. Bowler & Konstantin B. Gongalsky & Minghua Shen & Scott R. Swengel & Jonathan M. Chase, 2024. "Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss," Nature, Nature, vol. 628(8007), pages 359-364, April.
    5. Fabian Klebl & Peter H. Feindt & Annette Piorr, 2024. "Farmers’ behavioural determinants of on-farm biodiversity management in Europe: a systematic review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(2), pages 831-861, June.
    6. Jänicke, Clemens & Goddard, Adam & Stein, Susanne & Steinmann, Horst-Henning & Lakes, Tobia & Nendel, Claas & Müller, Daniel, 2022. "Field-level land-use data reveal heterogeneous crop sequences with distinct regional differences in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 141, pages 1-12.
    7. Ana Klinnert & Ana Luisa Barbosa & Rui Catarino & Thomas Fellmann & Edoardo Baldoni & Caetano Beber & Jordan Hristov & Maria Luisa Paracchini & Carlo Rega & Franz Weiss & Peter Witzke & Emilio Rodrigu, 2024. "Landscape features support natural pest control and farm income when pesticide application is reduced," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Rubio-Delgado, Judit & Schnabel, Susanne & Lavado-Contador, J. Francisco & Schmutz, Ulrich, 2024. "Small woody features in agricultural areas: Agroforestry systems of overlooked significance in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Blanco, Julien & Sourdril, Anne & Deconchat, Marc & Barnaud, Cécile & San Cristobal, Magali & Andrieu, Emilie, 2020. "How farmers feel about trees: Perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices associated with rural forests in southwestern France," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    10. Uthes, Sandra & Kiesel, Joachim, 2020. "Creating a synthetic landscape: Spatial allocation of non-spatial single farm data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Jacobs, Anna & Flessa, Heinz & Don, Axel & Heidkamp, Arne & Prietz, Roland & Dechow, René & Gensior, Andreas & Poeplau, Christopher & Riggers, Catharina & Schneider, Florian & Tiemeyer, Bärbel & Vos, , 2018. "Landwirtschaftlich genutzte Böden in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der Bodenzustandserhebung," Thünen Reports 64, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Abdallah Alaoui & Moritz Hallama & Roger Bär & Ioanna Panagea & Felicitas Bachmann & Carola Pekrun & Luuk Fleskens & Ellen Kandeler & Rudi Hessel, 2022. "A New Framework to Assess Sustainability of Soil Improving Cropping Systems in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Bielza, Maria & Weiss, Franz & Hristov, Jordan & Fellmann, Thomas, 2025. "Impacts of reduced livestock density on European agriculture and the environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Veronika Hannus & Johannes Sauer, 2021. "Understanding Farmers’ Intention to Use a Sustainability Standard: The Role of Economic Rewards, Knowledge, and Ease of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Hanna Freudenreich & Sindu W. Kebede, 2022. "Experience of shocks, household wealth and expectation formation: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 756-774, September.
    6. Rudi Hessel & Guido Wyseure & Ioanna S. Panagea & Abdallah Alaoui & Mark S. Reed & Hedwig van Delden & Melanie Muro & Jane Mills & Oene Oenema & Francisco Areal & Erik van den Elsen & Simone Verzandvo, 2022. "Soil-Improving Cropping Systems for Sustainable and Profitable Farming in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Niles, Meredith T. & Stahlmann-Brown, Philip & Wesselbaum, Dennis, 2025. "Risk tolerance and climate concerns predict transformative agricultural land use change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Legrand D. F. Saint‐Cyr, 2022. "Heterogeneous farm‐size dynamics and impacts of subsidies from agricultural policy: Evidence from France," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 893-923, September.
    9. Aderajew, Tamirat S. & Du, Xiaoxue & Pennings, Joost M. E. & Trujillo-Barrera, Andres, 2020. "Farm-Level Risk-Balancing Behavior and the Role of Latent Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
    10. Zabala, José A. & Martínez-Paz, José M. & Alcon, Francisco, 2021. "Integrated valuation of semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem services and disservices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Pathak, Santosh & Wang, Hua & Adusumilli, Naveen C., 2022. "Contract Non-compliance and Moral Hazard: Evidence from Cost-share Programs in Louisiana, USA," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322324, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Luo Lei & Qiao Dakuan & Tang Jin & Wang Lishuang & Liu Yuying & Fu Xinhong, 2024. "Research on the influence of education and training of farmers' professional cooperatives on the willingness of members to green production—perspectives based on time, method and content elements," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 987-1006, January.
    13. Love Offeibea Asiedu-Ayeh & Xungang Zheng & Kobina Agbodah & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Adjei Peter Darko, 2022. "Promoting the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies for Sustainable Farming: A Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Jänicke, Clemens & Wesemeyer, Maximilian & Chiarella, Cristina & Lakes, Tobia & Levers, Christian & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Müller, Daniel & Pratzer, Marie & Rufin, Philippe, 2024. "Can we estimate farm size from field size? An empirical investigation of the field size to farm size relationship," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Nápoles-Vértiz, Sonia & Caro-Borrero, Angela, 2024. "Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Jianhua Wang & Yuanyuan Deng & Hanyu Diao, 2018. "Perceived Risk, Expected Benefits and Pig Farmers’ Behaviors of Veterinary Drug Usage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2025. "Digital Revolution in Agriculture: Using Predictive Models to Enhance Agricultural Performance Through Digital Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-31, January.
    18. Yuanying Chi & Yangmei Xu & Xu Wang & Feng Jin & Jialin Li, 2021. "A Win–Win Scenario for Agricultural Green Development and Farmers’ Agricultural Income: An Empirical Analysis Based on the EKC Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Beatriz Herrera Sabillón & Maria Gerster‐Bentaya & Andrea Knierim, 2022. "Measuring farmers' well‐being: Influence of farm‐level factors on satisfaction with work and quality of life," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 452-471, June.
    20. Dakuan Qiao & Lei Luo & Xingqiang Zheng & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "External Supervision, Face Consciousness, and Pesticide Safety Use: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.