IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v628y2024i8007d10.1038_s41586-023-06861-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss

Author

Listed:
  • Roel Klink

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Diana E. Bowler

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    Friedrich Schiller University Jena
    Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ)
    UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology)

  • Konstantin B. Gongalsky

    (Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • Minghua Shen

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Scott R. Swengel
  • Jonathan M. Chase

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

Abstract

Studies have reported widespread declines in terrestrial insect abundances in recent years1–4, but trends in other biodiversity metrics are less clear-cut5–7. Here we examined long-term trends in 923 terrestrial insect assemblages monitored in 106 studies, and found concomitant declines in abundance and species richness. For studies that were resolved to species level (551 sites in 57 studies), we observed a decline in the number of initially abundant species through time, but not in the number of very rare species. At the population level, we found that species that were most abundant at the start of the time series showed the strongest average declines (corrected for regression-to-the-mean effects). Rarer species were, on average, also declining, but these were offset by increases of other species. Our results suggest that the observed decreases in total insect abundance2 can mostly be explained by widespread declines of formerly abundant species. This counters the common narrative that biodiversity loss is mostly characterized by declines of rare species8,9. Although our results suggest that fundamental changes are occurring in insect assemblages, it is important to recognize that they represent only trends from those locations for which sufficient long-term data are available. Nevertheless, given the importance of abundant species in ecosystems10, their general declines are likely to have broad repercussions for food webs and ecosystem functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Roel Klink & Diana E. Bowler & Konstantin B. Gongalsky & Minghua Shen & Scott R. Swengel & Jonathan M. Chase, 2024. "Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss," Nature, Nature, vol. 628(8007), pages 359-364, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:628:y:2024:i:8007:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06861-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06861-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06861-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06861-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:628:y:2024:i:8007:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06861-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.