IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/labeco/v94y2025ics0927537125000247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Junior doctors’ specialty choice: Stated and revealed preferences over more than a decade

Author

Listed:
  • Méndez, Susan J.
  • Scott, Anthony
  • Sivey, Peter

Abstract

An important health policy issue in many countries is the over-specialisation of the medical workforce. Understanding junior doctors’ preferences over characteristics of alternative specialties is crucial in designing policies to improve the distribution of doctors across specialties. This paper estimates individual-level preferences over characteristics of alternative specialties from a stated-preference discrete-choice experiment (DCE) of junior doctors, then follows up the junior doctors from the DCE over the following twelve years to compare their actual labour market outcomes with their estimated preferences. Our results show that stronger preferences for higher earnings are associated with choosing the specialist rather than the general practice track after five years but this effect is smaller and not statistically significant after 12 years. Non-pecuniary intrinsic attributes of specialties, specifically those reflecting the ability to use human capital abilities and skills (e.g. academic opportunities or the ability to perform procedural work) are more enduring predictors of specialty choice over the long term. While the gap in earnings between general practitioners and specialists appears to impact on choices in the short term, this may be less relevant in the long term where matching to specialties based on abilities and skills play a more persistent role.

Suggested Citation

  • Méndez, Susan J. & Scott, Anthony & Sivey, Peter, 2025. "Junior doctors’ specialty choice: Stated and revealed preferences over more than a decade," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:94:y:2025:i:c:s0927537125000247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2025.102697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537125000247
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.labeco.2025.102697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:94:y:2025:i:c:s0927537125000247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/labeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.