IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v96y2025ics0957178725001213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach

Author

Listed:
  • Becchetti, Leonardo
  • Salustri, Francesco

Abstract

Renewable energy communities (RECs) are considered a key initiative for ecological transition by international institutions and policymakers. In our article, we analyze how RECs enhance cooperation in ecological transition with a game-theoretic approach. Depending on specific conditions, the interaction among RECs members can be modeled through a Prisoner’s Dilemma or a game where cooperation is the only equilibrium. A REC creates incentives for cooperation through three primary revenue sources: cost savings from self-produced and consumed energy, surplus energy sales, and government incentives. We identify the combination of these factors that leads to a cooperative Nash equilibrium, where the dominant strategy for prosumers is to create a REC with passive consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Becchetti, Leonardo & Salustri, Francesco, 2025. "Renewable energy communities and the ecological transition: A game theoretic bargaining approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001213
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001213
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D16 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Collaborative Consumption
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.