IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v220y2025ics1364032125005441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Koltunov, Maksym
  • De Vidovich, Lorenzo

Abstract

Research on energy communities moves from being a residual until 2014 to one of the key issues for the energy policies in 2025. To date, no systematic literature review on energy communities has comprehensively examined both the periods before and after the 2018–2019 EU Directives, while also avoiding a narrow focus on specific objectives and instead considering the entire research field. The present article is built upon a twenty-year dataset spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 collected from the Scopus database. We explore key topics and schools of thought, trend themes, international collaborations, and applied methodologies, with particular focus on the evolution of the field and the economic impacts. The study's dataset contains 813 papers from 273 journals, conference proceedings, and books. A descriptive analysis of the most influential journals and authors in the field is performed at the beginning followed by more advanced bibliometric methods. “Bibliometrix” package for R statistical software is used as a tool. Building on results of the bibliometric investigation, a systematic literature review is conducted manually focusing on titles, keywords, and abstracts. The field initially focused on UK case studies using sociological theories for replication, while Continental Europe emphasized top-down factors like policies and institutions fostering EC growth. Organizational and policy aspects dominated research, shifting toward innovative technology integration into communities with the advent of EU Directives. Outside Europe, the USA, Australia, Canada, Brazil, India, and China lead contributions. Future trends likely include further scrutinization of ‘energy commons’ at a time of increase of community models, policy comparisons and technology integration. Legal aspects and interactions with electricity markets remain underexplored.

Suggested Citation

  • Koltunov, Maksym & De Vidovich, Lorenzo, 2025. "Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:220:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125005441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:220:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.