IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v96y2025ics0957178725001067.html

Optimizing the strategic reserves of coal-fired power units to balance reliability and cost in China's clean energy transition

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jian
  • Huang, Yuming
  • Liu, Yuanxin
  • Yang, Na
  • Yuan, Jiahai

Abstract

The strategic reserve mechanism for coal-fired power units provides a viable policy option to address security concerns in the low-carbon transition of the power system. This paper proposes a strategic reserve selection framework combining Monte Carlo simulation and mixed-integer linear programming to identify optimal reserve units by minimizing the cost per unit reduction in expected energy not served, thereby quantifying the economic efficiency of converting units of different capacities such as 300 MW, 600 MW, and 1000 MW and with service ages ranging from 1 to 30 years into strategic reserves. Simulation results for a representative region in East China indicate that converting 1000 MW units at around 20 years of service age yields the best economic benefits. With a renewable penetration rate of 30 %, the minimum strategic reserve cost of a 1000 MW unit is 13,780 CNY/MWh, compared to 15,630 and 26,120 CNY/MWh for 600 MW and 300 MW units, respectively. When the penetration rate increases to 50 %, the minimum cost of 1000 MW, 600 MW, and 300 MW units is reduced by 80.19 %, 77.42 %, and 76.03 %, respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing reserve margin raises costs, while higher renewable penetration advances the optimal conversion age. Large-capacity units consistently offer superior reduction of expected energy not served, with up to 64.65 % reliability improvement. These findings provide empirical guidance for policymakers in coal-dependent countries, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of prioritizing large, moderately aged units for reserve conversion to balance reliability and economic objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jian & Huang, Yuming & Liu, Yuanxin & Yang, Na & Yuan, Jiahai, 2025. "Optimizing the strategic reserves of coal-fired power units to balance reliability and cost in China's clean energy transition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001067
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001067
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neuhoff, Karsten & Diekmann, Jochen & Kunz, Friedrich & Rüster, Sophia & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Schwenen, Sebastian, 2016. "A coordinated strategic reserve to safeguard the European energy transition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 252-263.
    2. Najafi, M. & Ehsan, M. & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. & Akhavein, A. & Afshar, K., 2010. "Optimal reserve capacity allocation with consideration of customer reliability requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3883-3890.
    3. Zamani Gargari, Milad & Ghaffarpour, Reza, 2020. "Reliability evaluation of multi-carrier energy system with different level of demands under various weather situation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. DEDOPOULOS, Illias & SMEERS, Yves, 1998. "An age reduction appraoch for finite horizon optimization of preventive maintenance for single units subject to random failures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1318, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Jain, Tanmay & Verma, Kusum, 2024. "Reliability based computational model for stochastic unit commitment of a bulk power system integrated with volatile wind power," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Youcef Ettoumi, F. & Mefti, A. & Adane, A. & Bouroubi, M.Y., 2002. "Statistical analysis of solar measurements in Algeria using beta distributions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 47-67.
    7. Liu, Jun & Xiong, Guojiang & Suganthan, Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam, 2025. "Differential evolution-based mixture distribution models for wind energy potential assessment: A comparative study for coastal regions of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    8. Kefford, Benjamin M. & Ballinger, Benjamin & Schmeda-Lopez, Diego R. & Greig, Chris & Smart, Simon, 2018. "The early retirement challenge for fossil fuel power plants in deep decarbonisation scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 294-306.
    9. Zhang, Weirong & Ren, Mengjia & Kang, Junjie & Zhou, Yiou & Yuan, Jiahai, 2022. "Estimating stranded coal assets in China's power sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Huang, Yu Wen & Kittner, Noah & Kammen, Daniel M., 2019. "ASEAN grid flexibility: Preparedness for grid integration of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 711-726.
    11. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & de Vries, Laurens J., 2016. "The effectiveness of a strategic reserve in the presence of a high portfolio share of renewable energy sources," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 13-28.
    12. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn C. & Kröger, Mats, 2023. "Reacting to changing paradigms: How and why to reform electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels, 2012. "Economics and Design of Capacity Markets for the Power Sector," Papers of Peter Cramton 12cocap, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 2012.
    14. Liu, Yingqi, 2017. "Demand response and energy efficiency in the capacity resource procurement: Case studies of forward capacity markets in ISO New England, PJM and Great Britain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 271-282.
    15. Prajapati, Vijaykumar K. & Mahajan, Vasundhara, 2021. "Reliability assessment and congestion management of power system with energy storage system and uncertain renewable resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    16. Karsten Neuhoff & Jörn C. Richstein & Mats Kröger, 2023. "Reacting to Changing Paradigms: How and Why to Reform Electricity Markets," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 127, number pbk189.
    17. Durmaz, Tunç & Acar, Sevil & Kızılkaya, Simay, 2024. "Generation failures, strategic withholding, and capacity payments in the Turkish electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Brito-Pereira, Paulo & Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo & Barroso, Luiz Augusto & Batlle, Carlos, 2022. "Adjusting the aim of capacity mechanisms: Future-proof reliability metrics and firm supply calculations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Baseer, M.A. & Meyer, J.P. & Rehman, S. & Alam, Md. Mahbub, 2017. "Wind power characteristics of seven data collection sites in Jubail, Saudi Arabia using Weibull parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 35-49.
    20. Weale, Graham, 2023. "Can an energy-only market fully remunerate investment? Empirical evidence since 2005," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaves, J. P. & Cossent, R. & Gómez San Román, T. & Linares, P. & Rivier, M., 2023. "An assessment of the European electricity market reform options and a pragmatic proposal," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2325, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Jimenez, I. Sanchez & Ribó-Pérez, D. & Cvetkovic, M. & Kochems, J. & Schimeczek, C. & de Vries, L.J., 2024. "Can an energy only market enable resource adequacy in a decarbonized power system? A co-simulation with two agent-based-models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    3. Lo Prete, Chiara & Palmer, Karen & Robertson, Molly, 2025. "Time for a market upgrade? A review of wholesale electricity market designs for the future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. J.P. Chaves & R. Cossent & T. Gómez San Román & P. Linares & M. Rivier, 2023. "An assessment of the European electricity market reform options and a pragmatic proposal," Working Papers EPRG2305, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Paul Adrianus van Baal, 2020. "Effectiveness of a strategic energy reserve during the energy transition: The case of Switzerland," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 21(2), pages 65-90, June.
    6. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & Iychettira, Kaveri K. & Vries, Laurens J. De, 2017. "Cross-border effects of capacity mechanisms in interconnected power systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46, pages 33-47.
    7. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Marcheselli, Anna & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & De Vries, Laurens J., 2017. "An analysis of a forward capacity market with long-term contracts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 255-267.
    8. Luo, Yilun & Ahmadi, Esmaeil & McLellan, Benjamin Craig & Tezuka, Tetsuo, 2024. "A hybrid system dynamics model for power mix trajectory simulation in liberalized electricity markets considering carbon and capacity policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Sonnsjö, Hannes, 2024. "What we talk about when we talk about electricity: A thematic analysis of recent political debates on Swedish electricity supply," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Lo Prete, Chiara & Palmer, Karen & Robertson, Molly, 2024. "Time for a Market Upgrade? A Review of Wholesale Electricity Market Designs for the Future," RFF Reports 24-09, Resources for the Future.
    11. Sebastian Schäfer & Lisa Altvater, 2019. "On the functioning of a capacity market with an increasing share of renewable energy," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 59-84, August.
    12. Chyong, C. & Pollitt, M. & Cruise, R., 2019. "Can wholesale electricity prices support “subsidy-free” generation investment in Europe?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1955, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Esmeralda Colombo, 2025. "The Fifth Freedom: Shaping EU Innovation Policy for Renewable Energy Storage and Decarbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1059-1078.
    15. Michał Pikus & Jarosław Wąs, 2024. "Predictive Modeling of Renewable Energy Purchase Prices Using Deep Learning Based on Polish Power Grid Data for Small Hybrid PV Microinstallations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Hosseini Dolatabadi, Sayed Hamid & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Chen, Yang & Morales, Jose Luis, 2024. "A stochastic game-theoretic optimization approach for managing local electricity markets with electric vehicles and renewable sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    17. Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Oitzinger, Maximilian & Fischer, Helen Anais & Backe, Stian, 2025. "Strategic solar module stockpiling in the EU: A scenario-based analysis of costs and benefits beyond 2030," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Marcheselli, Anna & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J. L. & Vries, Laurens J. De, 2017. "An analysis of a forward capacity market with long-term contracts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 111, pages 255-267.
    19. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn C. & Kröger, Mats, 2023. "Reacting to changing paradigms: How and why to reform electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Kozlova, Mariia & Huhta, Kaisa & Lohrmann, Alena, 2023. "The interface between support schemes for renewable energy and security of supply: Reviewing capacity mechanisms and support schemes for renewable energy in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.