IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v91y2024ics0957178724001176.html

The impact of extended decision times in planning and regulatory processes for energy infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Longoria, Genaro
  • Lynch, Muireann
  • Farrell, Niall
  • Curtis, John

Abstract

Effective planning and regulatory processes ensure orderly energy systems. Often, decisions are not made within mandated timeframes and discrete approval processes are infrequent. A given delay may be compounded where multiple approval processes exist in sequence. These factors can negatively affect system costs and, ultimately, consumer welfare. We show that delays have meaningful impacts on electricity prices, system emissions, infrastructure investment and system operating costs. Our numerical simulation of data from Ireland shows that wholesale electricity prices are up to 10% higher and CO2 emissions up to 4% higher, attributable to delays associated with planning and regulatory approvals.

Suggested Citation

  • Longoria, Genaro & Lynch, Muireann & Farrell, Niall & Curtis, John, 2024. "The impact of extended decision times in planning and regulatory processes for energy infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0957178724001176
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001176
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2024.101824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "Power system impacts of community acceptance policies for renewable energy deployment under storage cost uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 893-912.
    2. Bayer, Benjamin & Berthold, Lennart & Moreno Rodrigo de Freitas, Bruno, 2018. "The Brazilian experience with auctions for wind power: An assessment of project delays and potential mitigation measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 97-117.
    3. Pettersson, Maria & Ek, Kristina & Söderholm, Kristina & Söderholm, Patrik, 2010. "Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3116-3123, December.
    4. Bayer, Benjamin & Schäuble, Dominik & Ferrari, Michele, 2018. "International experiences with tender procedures for renewable energy – A comparison of current developments in Brazil, France, Italy and South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 305-327.
    5. Ramos, V. & Giannini, G. & Calheiros-Cabral, T. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "Legal framework of marine renewable energy: A review for the Atlantic region of Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Vasconcelos, Rafael Monteiro de & Silva, Lara Luana Cirilo & González, Mario Orestes Aguirre & Santiso, Andressa Medeiros & de Melo, David Cassimiro, 2022. "Environmental licensing for offshore wind farms: Guidelines and policy implications for new markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Koecklin, Manuel Tong & Longoria, Genaro & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2021. "Public acceptance of renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments: Insights from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Bertsch, Valentin & Hyland, Marie & Mahony, Michael, 2017. "What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 472-497.
    9. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "Enhanced network effects and stochastic modelling in generation expansion planning: Insights from an insular power system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Jason Harold & Valentin Bertsch & Thomas Lawrence & Magie Hall, 2021. "Drivers of People’s Preferences for Spatial Proximity to Energy Infrastructure Technologies: A Cross-country Analysis," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(4), pages 47-90, July.
    11. repec:aen:journl:ej42-4-harol is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Scarff, Gavin & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim, 2015. "The new mode of marine planning in the UK: Aspirations and challenges," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 96-102.
    13. Lynch & John Curtis, 2016. "The effects of wind generation capacity on electricity prices and generation costs: a Monte Carlo analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 133-151, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei, Kai & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Do extreme temperatures exacerbate residential energy expenses burden in China?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Katherine Emma Lonergan & Giovanni Sansavini, 2025. "Considering distributive justice as a planning principle helps navigate a diversity of future energy infrastructure designs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koecklin, Manuel Tong & Longoria, Genaro & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2021. "Public acceptance of renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments: Insights from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Plaga, Leonie Sara & Lynch, Muireann & Curtis, John & Bertsch, Valentin, 2024. "How public acceptance affects power system development—A cross-country analysis for wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    3. Gaur, Ankita Singh & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Longoria, Genaro, 2022. "Implications of heating sector electrification on the Irish power system in view of the Climate Action Plan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. David Huckebrink & Valentin Bertsch, 2021. "Integrating Behavioural Aspects in Energy System Modelling—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Wen, Xin & Contreras, Julia Gonzalez & Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle & Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2025. "High sensitivity to methodological choices when integrating social acceptance data in electricity system modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PA).
    6. Batz Liñeiro, Taimyra & Müsgens, Felix, 2021. "Evaluating the German PV auction program: The secrets of individual bids revealed," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Batz Liñeiro, Taimyra & Müsgens, Felix, 2023. "Evaluating the German onshore wind auction programme: An analysis based on individual bids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Goforth, Teagan & Levin, Todd & Nock, Destenie, 2025. "Incorporating energy justice and equity objectives in power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "Power system impacts of community acceptance policies for renewable energy deployment under storage cost uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 893-912.
    10. McQuinn, Kieran & Foley, Daniel & O'Toole, Conor, 2017. "Quarterly Economic Commentary, Summer 2017," Forecasting Report, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number QEC20172, February.
    11. Lynch, Muireann A, 2017. "Re-evaluating Irish energy policy in light of brexit," Research Notes RN20170201, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Finke, Jonas & Bertsch, Valentin, 2023. "Implementing a highly adaptable method for the multi-objective optimisation of energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    13. Hastings-Simon, Sara & Leach, Andrew & Shaffer, Blake & Weis, Tim, 2022. "Alberta's Renewable Electricity Program: Design, results, and lessons learned," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Vivien Fisch-Romito & Marc Jaxa-Rozen & Xin Wen & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2025. "Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modelling," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(4), pages 460-469, April.
    15. Bertsch, Valentin & Di Cosmo, Valeria, 2020. "Are renewables profitable in 2030 and do they reduce carbon emissions effectively? A comparison across Europe," MPRA Paper 101822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Lynch, Muireann . & Longoria, Genora & Curtis, John, 2021. "Future market design options for electricity markets with high RES-E: lessons from the Irish Single Electricity Market," Papers WP702, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    17. Tabar, Vahid Sohrabi & Banazadeh, Hamidreza & Tostado-Véliz, Marcos & Jordehi, Ahmad Rezaee & Nasir, Mohammad & Jurado, Francisco, 2022. "Stochastic multi-stage multi-objective expansion of renewable resources and electrical energy storage units in distribution systems considering crypto-currency miners and responsive loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1131-1147.
    18. Martinez, A. & Murphy, L. & Iglesias, G., 2023. "Evolution of offshore wind resources in Northern Europe under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    19. Lynch, Muireann & Longoria, Genaro & Curtis, John, 2021. "Market design options for electricity markets with high variable renewable generation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0957178724001176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.