IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v89y2024ics0301420723012631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the asymmetric impact of fintech, natural resources, and environmental regulations on ecological footprint in G7 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Xia, Aiming
  • Liu, Qing

Abstract

Ecological sustainability is one of the utmost agenda for policymakers across the world. In this dimension, identifying the innovative role of Fintech is imperative to ensure an efficient resource allocation with inclusive economic and environmental performance. G7 countries are divergent in resource endowment, technological advancement, financial integrity, environmental controls and structural shifts. Therefore, the study employs the nonlinear method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) for the empirical investigation to evaluate the asymmetric influence of Fintech, natural resources rent, and ecological regulations on ecological footprints (EF) from 2000 to 2020. The pre-requisite analysis affirms the abnormal data distribution and structural variations. The estimated outcomes demonstrate that Fintech significantly reduces EF across all quantiles except the highest (0.95th) quantile. Likewise, ecological governance significantly discourages the EF from lower to higher quantiles and has large parameter coefficients at higher ecological deficits. In contrast, natural resources significantly increases EF from lower to upper EF quantiles, whereas the positive marginal influences are prominent at upper quantiles. The robustness check verifies the consistent results. Panel causality analysis exhibits a one-way causal relationship between Fintech, environmental regulations, and EF and a two-way causality connection among natural resources, economic growth, and EF.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia, Aiming & Liu, Qing, 2024. "Modelling the asymmetric impact of fintech, natural resources, and environmental regulations on ecological footprint in G7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012631
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723012631
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723012631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.