IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v41y2014icp60-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Major challenges for developing unconventional gas in Brazil – Will water resources impede the development of the Country׳s industry?

Author

Listed:
  • Camargo, Tathiany R. Moreira de
  • Merschmann, Paulo Roberto de C.
  • Arroyo, Eveline Vasquez
  • Szklo, Alexandre

Abstract

Over this decade unconventional gas has acquired increasing importance due to new techniques that have enabled its large-scale commercial exploration, particularly in the USA. Other countries are evaluating their potential for shale gas exploration. Forecasts point out that the unconventional natural gas resources might represent an increasing share of Brazil׳s energy supply. However, this scenario still faces technological and environmental challenges. This article analyzes whether Brazil׳s gas industry is prepared to develop shale gas, and if there will be water available close to potential unconventional gas resources basins in appropriate volumes and quality, to support fracturing operations. Findings show that Brazil may face challenges to use hydraulic fracturing in the adjacent water basins. The Paraná basin presents the best sites in terms of water availability, followed by the sub-basins within the state of Piaui, where the water demand is low. On the other hand, the water availability in most part of the state of Rio Grande do Sul is critical. The same occurs in the sub-basin and the UGRH located in the state of Minas Gerais. The choice of the wells׳ location must consider the water availability and quality, as indicated in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Camargo, Tathiany R. Moreira de & Merschmann, Paulo Roberto de C. & Arroyo, Eveline Vasquez & Szklo, Alexandre, 2014. "Major challenges for developing unconventional gas in Brazil – Will water resources impede the development of the Country׳s industry?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:41:y:2014:i:c:p:60-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420714000257
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxwell, Don & Zhu, Zhen, 2011. "Natural gas prices, LNG transport costs, and the dynamics of LNG imports," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 217-226, March.
    2. Kavalov, Boyan & Petric, Hrvoje & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2011. "Evolution of the indigenous European oil and gas sources--Recent trends and issues for consideration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 487-492, January.
    3. Shi, Guo-Hua & Jing, You-Yin & Wang, Song-Ling & Zhang, Xu-Tao, 2010. "Development status of liquefied natural gas industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7457-7465, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucena, André F.P. & Clarke, Leon & Schaeffer, Roberto & Szklo, Alexandre & Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Nogueira, Larissa P.P. & Daenzer, Kathryn & Gurgel, Angelo & Kitous, Alban & Kober, Tom, 2016. "Climate policy scenarios in Brazil: A multi-model comparison for energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 564-574.
    2. Li, Yanbin & Li, Yun & Wang, Bingqian & Chen, Zhuoer & Nie, Dan, 2016. "The status quo review and suggested policies for shale gas development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 420-428.
    3. Aba, Michael M. & Parente, Virginia & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2022. "Estimation of water demand of the three major Brazilian shale-gas basins: Implications for water availability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yi & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2018. "The price and income elasticity of China's natural gas demand: A multi-sectoral perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 332-341.
    2. Shi, Xunpeng & Padinjare Variam, Hari Malamakkavu, 2016. "Gas and LNG trading hubs, hub indexation and destination flexibility in East Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 587-596.
    3. Tomków, Łukasz & Cholewiński, Maciej, 2015. "Improvement of the LNG (liquid natural gas) regasification efficiency by utilizing the cold exergy with a coupled absorption – ORC (organic Rankine cycle)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 645-653.
    4. Fernández, Ignacio Arias & Gómez, Manuel Romero & Gómez, Javier Romero & Insua, Álvaro Baaliña, 2017. "Review of propulsion systems on LNG carriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1395-1411.
    5. Ali Rehman & Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Ashfaq Ahmad & Saad Nawaz & Moonyong Lee & Li Wang, 2020. "Performance Enhancement of Nitrogen Dual Expander and Single Mixed Refrigerant LNG Processes Using Jaya Optimization Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Yonezawa, Koichi & Richards, Timothy J., 2016. "Competitive Package Size Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 445-469.
    7. Najm, Sarah & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi, 2020. "Does renewable energy substitute LNG international trade in the energy transition?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Chen, Hao & Geng, Hao-Peng & Ling, Hui-Ting & Peng, Song & Li, Nan & Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "Modeling the coal-to-gas switch potentials in the power sector: A case study of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Yan, Zhaojin & Yang, Guanghao & He, Rong & Yang, Hui & Ci, Hui, 2023. "“Ship-port-country” multi-dimensional research on the fine analysis of China's LNG trade," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Girma T. Chala & Abd Rashid Abd Aziz & Ftwi Y. Hagos, 2018. "Natural Gas Engine Technologies: Challenges and Energy Sustainability Issue," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-44, October.
    11. Nick, Sebastian & Thoenes, Stefan, 2014. "What drives natural gas prices? — A structural VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 517-527.
    12. Yassine Kirat, 2021. "The US shale gas revolution: An opportunity for the US manufacturing sector?," Post-Print hal-03676616, HAL.
    13. Dong, Jun & Zhang, Xu & Xu, Xiaolin, 2012. "Techno-economic assessment and policy of gas power generation considering the role of multiple stakeholders in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 209-221.
    14. Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe & Yelkenci, Tezer, 2016. "Scrutinizing the causality relationships between prices, production and consumption of fossil fuels: A panel data approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 44-53.
    15. Yin, Yuwei & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2022. "Bottlenecks of LNG supply chain in energy transition: A case study of China using system dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. He, Yongxiu & Wang, Bing & Wang, Jianhui & Xiong, Wei & Xia, Tian, 2013. "Correlation between Chinese and international energy prices based on a HP filter and time difference analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 898-909.
    17. Matt Zahynacz, 2013. "Prospects for Exporting Liquefied Natural Gas from British Columbia: An Application of Monte Carlo Cost-Benefit Analysis," Working Papers 2013-03, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    18. McLean, Sheldon & Charles, Don & Rajkumar, Antonio, 2021. "Navigating transfer pricing risk in the oil and gas sector: Essential elements of a policy framework for Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 101, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Mingqi Zhang & Meirong Su & Weiwei Lu & Chunhua Su, 2015. "An Assessment of the Security of China’s Natural Gas Supply System Using Two Network Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Eleni Strantzali & Konstantinos Aravossis & Georgios A. Livanos & Nikos Chrysanthopoulos, 2018. "A Novel Multicriteria Evaluation of Small-Scale LNG Supply Alternatives: The Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:41:y:2014:i:c:p:60-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.