IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v168y2022ics0301421522003925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of water demand of the three major Brazilian shale-gas basins: Implications for water availability

Author

Listed:
  • Aba, Michael M.
  • Parente, Virginia
  • dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho

Abstract

Shale gas exists in abundant quantities around the world and could augment conventional natural gas supplies. However, shale gas exploration through the fracking process is associated with negative connotations and is opposed in many countries because of the perceived environmental impacts including water contamination and competition with other water demands. In this context, the contribution of this work is to analyze the long-term impact of fracking water demand on water availability and possible contamination in Brazil. The objective is to estimate the long-term impacts of shale gas development in Brazil considering the water demand and propose regulations to address water withdrawal and contamination concerns based on best practices from around the world as a way forward. The study demonstrates that competition for water by prospective fracking activities in Brazil in comparison to available water resources and other water demands in associated hydrological basins is insignificant. Furthermore, an analysis of policy and regulations identify policy and regulatory recommendations that may ameliorate public concerns about fracking impact on water by enforcing compliance from exploration and production companies. Following this study, other countries can estimate their shale gas exploration realities to determine the impact of fracking impact on water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Aba, Michael M. & Parente, Virginia & dos Santos, Edmilson Moutinho, 2022. "Estimation of water demand of the three major Brazilian shale-gas basins: Implications for water availability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421522003925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lozano Maya, Juan Roberto, 2013. "The United States experience as a reference of success for shale gas development: The case of Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 70-78.
    2. Solarin, Sakiru Adebola & Bello, Mufutau Opeyemi, 2020. "The impact of shale gas development on the U.S economy: Evidence from a quantile autoregressive distributed lag model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Andreas Goldthau & Michael LaBelle, 2016. "The Power of Policy Regimes: Explaining Shale Gas Policy Divergence in Bulgaria and Poland," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 33(6), pages 603-622, November.
    4. Grecu, Eugenia & Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela & Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu, 2018. "The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 691-700.
    5. Kuchler, Magdalena & Höök, Mikael, 2020. "Fractured visions: Anticipating (un)conventional natural gas in Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Camargo, Tathiany R. Moreira de & Merschmann, Paulo Roberto de C. & Arroyo, Eveline Vasquez & Szklo, Alexandre, 2014. "Major challenges for developing unconventional gas in Brazil – Will water resources impede the development of the Country׳s industry?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-71.
    7. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    8. Guo, Meiyu & Lu, Xi & Nielsen, Chris P. & McElroy, Michael B. & Shi, Wenrui & Chen, Yuntian & Xu, Yuan, 2016. "Prospects for shale gas production in China: Implications for water demand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 742-750.
    9. Tim Boersma & Corey Johnson, 2012. "The Shale Gas Revolution: U.S. and EU Policy and Research Agendas," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(4), pages 570-576, July.
    10. Rahm, Dianne, 2011. "Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2974-2981, May.
    11. Lenhard, L.G. & Andersen, S.M. & Coimbra-Araújo, C.H., 2018. "Energy-Environmental Implications Of Shale Gas Exploration In Paraná Hydrological Basin, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 56-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasminah Beebeejaun, 2017. "Exploring the intersections between local knowledge and environmental regulation: A study of shale gas extraction in Texas and Lancashire," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(3), pages 417-433, May.
    2. Holahan, Robert & Arnold, Gwen, 2013. "An institutional theory of hydraulic fracturing policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 127-134.
    3. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Johnson, Corey & Boersma, Tim, 2013. "Energy (in)security in Poland the case of shale gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 389-399.
    5. Xi Yang & Alun Gu & Fujie Jiang & Wenli Xie & Qi Wu, 2020. "Integrated Assessment Modeling of China’s Shale Gas Resource: Energy System Optimization, Environmental Cobenefits, and Methane Risk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Wang, Qiang & Zhan, Lina, 2019. "Assessing the sustainability of the shale gas industry by combining DPSIRM model and RAGA-PP techniques: An empirical analysis of Sichuan and Chongqing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 353-364.
    7. He, Li & Feng, Hushen & Luo, Pengfei & Luo, Yugeng & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    8. Wei, Yi-Ming & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yu, Bi-Ying & Liao, Hua & Du, Yun-Fei, 2017. "A dynamic forward-citation full path model for technology monitoring: An empirical study from shale gas industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 769-780.
    9. Egging, Ruud & Pichler, Alois & Kalvø, Øyvind Iversen & Walle–Hansen, Thomas Meyer, 2017. "Risk aversion in imperfect natural gas markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 367-383.
    10. Zilliox, Skylar & Smith, Jessica M., 2017. "Memorandums of understanding and public trust in local government for Colorado's unconventional energy industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 72-81.
    11. Saulo B. de Oliveira & Colombo C. G. Tassinari & Richardson M. Abraham‐A. & Ignacio Torresi, 2021. "3D implicit modeling applied to the evaluation of CO2 geological storage in the shales of the Irati Formation, Paraná Basin, Southeastern Brazil," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 1024-1042, October.
    12. Nguyen, Phong & Carey, J. William & Viswanathan, Hari S. & Porter, Mark, 2018. "Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 160-174.
    13. Mohamed Mehana & Fangxuan Chen & Mashhad Fahes & Qinjun Kang & Hari Viswanathan, 2022. "Geochemical Modelling of the Fracturing Fluid Transport in Shale Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Zhang, Shuo & Song, Shengyuan & Zhang, Wen & Zhao, Jinmin & Cao, Dongfang & Ma, Wenliang & Chen, Zijian & Hu, Ying, 2023. "Research on the inherent mechanism of rock mass deformation of oil shale in-situ mining under the condition of thermal-fluid-solid coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Kriesky, J. & Goldstein, B.D. & Zell, K. & Beach, S., 2013. "Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 228-236.
    16. Zhou, Junping & Tian, Shifeng & Zhou, Lei & Xian, Xuefu & Yang, Kang & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhang, Chengpeng & Guo, Yaowen, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the influence of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation time on the permeability of fractured shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Gail Krantzberg & Stephanie Theriault, 2017. "Would Implementing Responsible Care® Principles Improve the Safety of the Fracking Industry?," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 6(06), pages 55-62, June.
    18. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    19. Zhang, Lisong & Li, Jing & Sun, Luning & Yang, Feiyue, 2021. "An influence mechanism of shale barrier on heavy oil recovery using SAGD based on theoretical and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Piotr Słomski & Maria Mastalerz & Jacek Szczepański & Arkadiusz Derkowski & Tomasz Topór & Marcin Lutyński, 2020. "Experimental and numerical investigation of CO2–brine–rock interactions in the early Palaeozoic mudstones from the Polish part of the Baltic Basin at simulatedin situ conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 567-590, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.