IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v230y2018icp160-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Phong
  • Carey, J. William
  • Viswanathan, Hari S.
  • Porter, Mark

Abstract

Current oil recovery methods in hydraulically fractured shale reservoirs have a low recovery efficiency of about 10%. The objective of this work is to investigate the effectiveness of nitrogen and supercritical carbon dioxide in the huff-and-puff method for enhanced oil recovery as a means to re-energize reservoirs and improve recovery rates. We conduct direct visualization experiments with a microfluidic system to reveal the mechanisms and to quantify the recovery rates of oil from fracture networks. We compared the effectiveness of water, nitrogen and supercritical carbon dioxide at reservoir conditions in a process mimicking the huff-and-puff method in both dead-end and connected fracture systems. The microfluidic chips were made of glass and placed in a confining pressure system pressurized to 10 MPa, 50 °C. The system was allowed to equilibrate, and then depressurized to simulate huff-and-puff oil recovery. Fluorescence microscope images were continuously taken to visualize and calculate residual oil saturation as a function of pressure drawdown. As the system was depressurized from 10 MPa, gas exsolution from the oil liquid phase, including bubble nucleation, growth, and coalescence, appeared to be the main driver for mobilizing oil from the fracture networks. Injection of supercritical CO2 resulted in the highest recovery rate with an average end-point recovery of about 90% in the connected fracture network and 60% in the dead-end fracture network. N2 has lower solubility in oil and hence showed a lower recovery rate of 40% in the connected fracture network and 25% in the dead-end fracture network. Injection of water had no effect on oil mobilization since water is insoluble, immiscible and incompressible. The main mechanism of enhanced recovery was gas exsolution from the liquid phase as pressure was decreased below the bubble point pressure. Because the gas was distributed throughout the oil phase, bubble nucleation, growth, coalescence, and elongation occurred throughout the fracture network. Expansion of the gas forced oil out of the network through piston displacement in continuous oil areas and film flow in the dispersed oil areas. Bubbles began as spheres and grew until they touched the fracture walls where they elongated along the fracture length. The bubble growth rate depended on local mass transfer from liquid to gas phase and gas volume expansion due to pressure drop. The efficiency of the huff-and-puff process is dependent on the solubility and miscibility of the injection fluid with oil. High gas solubility allows for more bubble nucleation, growth and expansion during the depressurization cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Phong & Carey, J. William & Viswanathan, Hari S. & Porter, Mark, 2018. "Effectiveness of supercritical-CO2 and N2 huff-and-puff methods of enhanced oil recovery in shale fracture networks using microfluidic experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 160-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:230:y:2018:i:c:p:160-174
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918312686
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Tae Hong & Cho, Jinhyung & Lee, Kun Sang, 2017. "Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1195-1206.
    2. Wang, Ke & Li, Haitao & Wang, Junchao & Jiang, Beibei & Bu, Chengzhong & Zhang, Qing & Luo, Wei, 2017. "Predicting production and estimated ultimate recoveries for shale gas wells: A new methodology approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1416-1431.
    3. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    4. Weijermars, Ruud, 2014. "US shale gas production outlook based on well roll-out rate scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 283-297.
    5. Middleton, Richard S. & Carey, J. William & Currier, Robert P. & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Kang, Qinjun & Karra, Satish & Jiménez-Martínez, Joaquín & Porter, Mark L. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2015. "Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 500-509.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitrii Pereponov & Michael Tarkhov & Desmond Batsa Dorhjie & Alexander Rykov & Ivan Filippov & Elena Zenova & Vladislav Krutko & Alexey Cheremisin & Evgeny Shilov, 2023. "Microfluidic Studies on Minimum Miscibility Pressure for n-Decane and CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Desmond Batsa Dorhjie & Elena Mukhina & Anton Kasyanenko & Alexey Cheremisin, 2023. "Tight and Shale Oil Exploration: A Review of the Global Experience and a Case of West Siberia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Chen, Binbin & Xuan, Jin & Offer, Gregory James & Wang, Huizhi, 2020. "Multiplex measurement of diffusion in zinc battery electrolytes from microfluidics using Raman microspectroscopy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Song, Hongqing & Lao, Junming & Zhang, Liyuan & Xie, Chiyu & Wang, Yuhe, 2023. "Underground hydrogen storage in reservoirs: pore-scale mechanisms and optimization of storage capacity and efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    5. Lei Li & Xue Zhang & Jiahui Liu & Qiuheng Xie & Xiaomei Zhou & Jianyang Zheng & Yuliang Su, 2022. "Research Progress and Prospect of Carbon Dioxide Utilization and Storage Based on Unconventional Oil and Gas Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    7. Mohamed Mehana & Qinjun Kang & Hari Viswanathan, 2020. "Molecular-Scale Considerations of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Zhang, Xue & Su, Yuliang & Li, Lei & Da, Qi'an & Hao, Yongmao & Wang, Wendong & Liu, Jiahui & Gao, Xiaogang & Zhao, An & Wang, Kaiyu, 2022. "Microscopic remaining oil initiation mechanism and formation damage of CO2 injection after waterflooding in deep reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Chao Chen & Xiang Tang & Ming Qin & Rui Zhou & Zhenhua Ding & Guihui Lian & Huan Qi & Xin Chen & Zheyu Liu & Yiqiang Li, 2022. "Experimental Evaluation of Shale Oil Development Effectiveness by Air Injection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Huang, Xianfu & Zhao, Ya-Pu, 2023. "Evolution of pore structure and adsorption-desorption in oil shale formation rocks after compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Li, Zongfa & Liu, Jiahui & Su, Yuliang & Fan, Liyao & Hao, Yongmao & kanjibayi, Bahedawulieti & Huang, Lijuan & Ren, Shaoran & Sun, Yongquan & Liu, Ran, 2023. "Influences of diffusion and advection on dynamic oil-CO2 mixing during CO2 EOR and storage process: Experimental study and numerical modeling at pore-scales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    12. Jian, Guoqing & Gizzatov, Ayrat & Kawelah, Mohammed & AlYousef, Zuhair & Abdel-Fattah, Amr I., 2021. "Simply built microfluidics for fast screening of CO2 foam surfactants and foam model parameters estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. Ganggang Hou & Xiaoli Ma & Wenyue Zhao & Pengxiang Diwu & Tongjing Liu & Jirui Hou, 2021. "Synergistic Modes and Enhanced Oil Recovery Mechanism of CO 2 Synergistic Huff and Puff," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Guo, Yaohao & Liu, Fen & Qiu, Junjie & Xu, Zhi & Bao, Bo, 2022. "Microscopic transport and phase behaviors of CO2 injection in heterogeneous formations using microfluidics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    15. Hao, Yongmao & Li, Zongfa & Su, Yuliang & Kong, Chuixian & Chen, Hong & Meng, Yang, 2022. "Experimental investigation of CO2 storage and oil production of different CO2 injection methods at pore-scale and core-scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Xu & Wang, Xiaoqi & Yan, Weipeng & Meng, Siwei & Liu, Xiaodan & Jiao, Hang & Su, Ling & Zhu, Rukai & Liu, He & Li, Jianming, 2019. "Exploration and casting of large scale microscopic pathways for shale using electrodeposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 32-39.
    2. Yang, Run & Liu, Xiangui & Yu, Rongze & Hu, Zhiming & Duan, Xianggang, 2022. "Long short-term memory suggests a model for predicting shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    3. Huang, Liang & Ning, Zhengfu & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Wentong & Cheng, Zhilin & Wu, Xiaojun & Qin, Huibo, 2018. "Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 28-43.
    4. Kant, Michael A. & Rossi, Edoardo & Duss, Jonas & Amann, Florian & Saar, Martin O. & Rudolf von Rohr, Philipp, 2018. "Demonstration of thermal borehole enlargement to facilitate controlled reservoir engineering for deep geothermal, oil or gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1501-1509.
    5. Huang, Jingwei & Jin, Tianying & Barrufet, Maria & Killough, John, 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Ahn, Yuchan & Kim, Junghwan & Kwon, Joseph Sang-Il, 2020. "Optimal design of supply chain network with carbon dioxide injection for enhanced shale gas recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    7. Crow, Daniel J.G. & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A dynamic model of global natural gas supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 452-469.
    8. Wang, Yan & Zhong, Dong-Liang & Li, Zheng & Li, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Application of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide semi-clathrate hydrate for CO2 capture from unconventional natural gases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Yang, Ruiyue & Hong, Chunyang & Huang, Zhongwei & Song, Xianzhi & Zhang, Shikun & Wen, Haitao, 2019. "Coal breakage using abrasive liquid nitrogen jet and its implications for coalbed methane recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    11. Andres Soage & Ruben Juanes & Ignasi Colominas & Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, 2021. "The Impact of the Geometry of the Effective Propped Volume on the Economic Performance of Shale Gas Well Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Katende, Allan & Rutqvist, Jonny & Massion, Cody & Radonjic, Mileva, 2023. "Experimental flow-through a single fracture with monolayer proppant at reservoir conditions: A case study on Caney Shale, Southwest Oklahoma, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    13. Li, Jing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Wenyang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Kun & Luo, Jia & Yu, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of energetic heterogeneity on gas adsorption and gas storage in geologic shale systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Feng, Gan & Kang, Yong & Sun, Ze-dong & Wang, Xiao-chuan & Hu, Yao-qing, 2019. "Effects of supercritical CO2 adsorption on the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 870-882.
    15. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    16. Zhang, Xiang & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Dianlin & Lu, Jun & Tong, Jing, 2021. "Characterizing pore-level oil mobilization processes in unconventional reservoirs assisted by state-of-the-art nuclear magnetic resonance technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    18. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    19. Filip Simeski & Matthias Ihme, 2023. "Supercritical fluids behave as complex networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Weiqiang Song & Hongjian Ni & Ruihe Wang & Mengyun Zhao, 2017. "Wellbore flow field of coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 745-755, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shale; EOR; Huff-and-puff; Microfluidic; CO2; Fracture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:230:y:2018:i:c:p:160-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.