IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v44y2014icp21-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A flexibly structured lot sizing heuristic for a static remanufacturing system

Author

Listed:
  • Schulz, Tobias
  • Voigt, Guido

Abstract

An effective planning of lot sizes is a key strategy to efficiently manage a combined manufacturing/remanufacturing system in the presence of substantial setup costs. Due to its complex interdependencies, optimal policies and solutions have not been identified so far, but several heuristic approaches have been analyzed in recent contributions. The main heuristic shortcuts are forcing equally sized lot sizes over the planning horizon as well as imposing a specific cycle structure, i.e., a sequence of manufacturing batches is followed by a sequence of remanufacturing batches. We are instead proposing a flexibly structured heuristic that allows for differently sized remanufacturing batches. We show in a comprehensive numerical study that our approach outperforms other existing approaches in more than half of all instances by up to 17%.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulz, Tobias & Voigt, Guido, 2014. "A flexibly structured lot sizing heuristic for a static remanufacturing system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 21-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:21-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048313000935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantaras, I. & Skouri, K., 2010. "Lot sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 326-335, June.
    2. Srivastava, Samir K., 2008. "Network design for reverse logistics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 535-548, August.
    3. Isabelle Huault & V. Perret & S. Charreire-Petit, 2007. "Management," Post-Print halshs-00337676, HAL.
    4. Francas, David & Minner, Stefan, 2009. "Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 757-769, August.
    5. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Ou Tang & Towill, Denis R., 2006. "Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 585-598, December.
    6. Mitra, Subrata, 2007. "Revenue management for remanufactured products," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 553-562, October.
    7. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2011. "A new lot-sizing heuristic for manufacturing systems with product recovery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 432-438, September.
    8. Barker, Theresa J. & Zabinsky, Zelda B., 2011. "A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 558-573, October.
    9. Choi, Dae-Won & Hwang, Hark & Koh, Shie-Gheun, 2007. "A generalized ordering and recovery policy for reusable items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 764-774, October.
    10. Mitra, Subrata, 2009. "Analysis of a two-echelon inventory system with returns," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 106-115, February.
    11. Teunter, Ruud H. & van der Laan, Erwin & Inderfurth, Karl, 2000. "How to set the holding cost rates in average cost inventory models with reverse logistics?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 409-415, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pilar I. Vidal-Carreras & Jose P. Garcia-Sabater & Julio J. Garcia-Sabater, 2017. "A practical model for managing inventories with unknown costs and a budget constraint," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 118-129, January.
    2. Yu-Chung Tsao & Vu-Thuy Linh & Jye-Chyi Lu & Vincent Yu, 0. "A supply chain network with product remanufacturing and carbon emission considerations: a two-phase design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    3. Bimal Kumar Mawandiya & J. K. Jha & Jitesh J. Thakkar, 2020. "Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1623-1664, September.
    4. Katsunori Kume & Takao Fujiwara, 2016. "Production Flexibility of Real Options in Daily Supply Chain," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(3), pages 249-264, September.
    5. Voigt, Guido & Schulz, Tobias, 2015. "Note on “Heuristics with guaranteed performance bounds for a manufacturing system with product recovery”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 575-578.
    6. Yu-Chung Tsao & Vu-Thuy Linh & Jye-Chyi Lu & Vincent Yu, 2018. "A supply chain network with product remanufacturing and carbon emission considerations: a two-phase design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 693-705, March.
    7. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2015. "Complete solution of the extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs," Discussion Papers 376, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    8. Hariga, Moncer & As’ad, Rami & Khan, Zeinab, 2017. "Manufacturing-remanufacturing policies for a centralized two stage supply chain under consignment stock partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 362-374.
    9. Mitra, Subrata, 2016. "Models to explore remanufacturing as a competitive strategy under duopoly," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 215-227.
    10. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2016. "A general production and recovery EOQ model with stationary demand and return rates," Discussion Papers 378, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:21-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.