IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joinma/v26y2012i3p115-130.html

So Whaddya Think? Consumers Create Ads and Other Consumers Critique Them

Author

Listed:
  • Ertimur, Burçak
  • Gilly, Mary C.

Abstract

With the availability of online creative tools, consumers create ad-like communications on their own or in response to company contests. These consumer-generated ads (CGA) are like word-of-mouth (WOM) in that they are consumer-to-consumer communications, yet they have the look and feel of traditional advertising. We examine consumer responses to both contest and unsolicited CGA and company ads using data gathered from consumers via netnography and depth interviews. Content analysis is used to compare the three ad types and reveals that the contest rules frame CGA so that they resemble company ads while unsolicited CGA differ from both ad types. Findings show that consumers respond to both types of CGA by engaging with the ad rather than the brand, much like an ad critic, while company ads elicit brand associations. Unsolicited CGA are seen as authentic, but not credible, while contest ads are seen as credible, but not authentic, revealing a boundary condition to the conventional view that authenticity leads to credibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ertimur, Burçak & Gilly, Mary C., 2012. "So Whaddya Think? Consumers Create Ads and Other Consumers Critique Them," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 115-130.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:26:y:2012:i:3:p:115-130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996811000752
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Jennifer Edson Escalas, 2007. "Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 421-429, December.
    3. Campbell, Margaret C & Kirmani, Amna, 2000. "Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 69-83, June.
    4. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    5. Herr, Paul M & Kardes, Frank R & Kim, John, 1991. "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 454-462, March.
    6. Kristine de Valck & Roberts V. Kozinets & Andrea C. Wojnicki & Sarah J.S. Wilner, 2010. "Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities," Post-Print hal-00458424, HAL.
    7. Charla Mathwick & Caroline Wiertz & Ko de Ruyter, 2008. "Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 832-849, November.
    8. Deighton, John & Romer, Daniel & McQueen, Josh, 1989. "Using Drama to Persuade," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(3), pages 335-343, December.
    9. Scott, Linda M, 1994. "The Bridge from Text to Mind: Adapting Reader-Response Theory to Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 461-480, December.
    10. Kassarjian, Harold H, 1977. "Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 8-18, June.
    11. Duan, Wenjing & Gu, Bin & Whinston, Andrew B., 2008. "The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—An empirical investigation of the movie industry," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 233-242.
    12. Randall L. Rose & Stacy L. Wood, 2005. "Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 284-296, September.
    13. Michael B. Beverland & Francis J. Farrelly, 2010. "The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers' Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 838-856, February.
    14. Ann E. Schlosser, 2005. "Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 260-265, September.
    15. Holt, Douglas B, 2002. "Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 70-90, June.
    16. Dina Mayzlin, 2006. "Promotional Chat on the Internet," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 155-163, 03-04.
    17. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1995. "Persuasion Knowledge: Lay People's and Researchers' Beliefs about the Psychology of Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(1), pages 62-74, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Negri, 2015. "User-generated video parodies in social media," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 75-95.
    2. Naletelich, Kelly & Ketron, Seth & Alejandro Gelves, J., 2023. "Curbing texting & driving with advertising co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Davis, Robert & Sheriff, Kevin & Owen, Kim, 2019. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer authenticity online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 17-31.
    4. Youcheng Chen & Sunbowen Zhang & Wenqi Ruan & Yongqiang Ma & Meiyu Wang & Yan Zhou, 2024. "What kind of UGA is effective for heritage tourism marketing? Matching effects of human elements and review types," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Labrecque, Lauren I. & vor dem Esche, Jonas & Mathwick, Charla & Novak, Thomas P. & Hofacker, Charles F., 2013. "Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 257-269.
    6. Dineva, Denitsa & Breitsohl, Jan & Garrod, Brian & Megicks, Philip, 2020. "Consumer Responses to Conflict-Management Strategies on Non-Profit Social Media Fan Pages," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 118-136.
    7. Carlos Orús & Raquel Gurrea & Carlos Flavián, 2017. "Facilitating imaginations through online product presentation videos: effects on imagery fluency, product attitude and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 661-700, December.
    8. Jean-Éric Pelet & Saïd Aboubaker Ettis, 2022. "Social Media Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Perceived originality, Liking, Credibility, Irritation, Intrusiveness, and Ad destination [Efficacité de la publicité sur les réseaux sociaux : le rôle de l'originalité perçue, de l'appréciation,," Post-Print hal-04139094, HAL.
    9. Jean-Éric Pelet & Saïd Aboubaker Ettis, 2022. "Social Media Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Perceived Originality, Liking, Credibility, Irritation, Intrusiveness, and Ad Destination," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Barnes, Stuart J. & Pressey, Andrew D., 2016. "Cyber-mavens and online flow experiences: Evidence from virtual worlds," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 285-296.
    11. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Stefania Farace & Gaetano Nino Miceli, 2018. "User-Generated Systems of Signs and Meanings in Product Customization: Taxonomies and Research Directions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 61-83.
    12. Hautz, Julia & Füller, Johann & Hutter, Katja & Thürridl, Carina, 2014. "Let Users Generate Your Video Ads? The Impact of Video Source and Quality on Consumers' Perceptions and Intended Behaviors," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-15.
    13. Douglas Olsen, G. & Pracejus, John W., 2020. "Customized advertising: Allowing consumers to directly tailor messages leads to better outcomes for the brand," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 245-257.
    14. Gensler, Sonja & Völckner, Franziska & Liu-Thompkins, Yuping & Wiertz, Caroline, 2013. "Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 242-256.
    15. Jean-Éric Pelet & Saïd Aboubaker Ettis, 2022. "Social Media Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Perceived originality, Liking, Credibility, Irritation, Intrusiveness, and Ad destination [Efficacité de la publicité sur les réseaux sociaux : le rôle de l'originalité perçue, de l'appréciation,," Post-Print hal-04139083, HAL.
    16. Voyer, Benjamin G. & Kastanakis, Minas N. & Rhode, Ann Kristin, 2017. "Co-creating stakeholder and brand identities: A cross-cultural consumer perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 399-410.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tourky, Marwa & Ebeid, Maha & Shaalan, Ahmed & Agag, Gomaa, 2026. "Winning over the sceptics: How end-consumers view the motives and authenticity of customer-entrepreneurs over time," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Chakravarty, Anindita & Liu, Yong & Mazumdar, Tridib, 2010. "The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics' Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 185-197.
    3. Hamby, Anne & Daniloski, Kim & Brinberg, David, 2015. "How consumer reviews persuade through narratives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1242-1250.
    4. Janée N. Burkhalter & Carolyn Folkman Curasi & Corliss G. Thornton & Naveen Donthu, 2017. "Music and its multitude of meanings: Exploring what makes brand placements in music videos authentic," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 140-160, March.
    5. Koukova, Nevena T. & Wang, Rebecca Jen-Hui & Isaac, Mathew S., 2023. "“If you loved our product”: Do conditional review requests harm retailer loyalty?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 85-101.
    6. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Mangold, Sabrina, 2013. "Do consumers still believe what is said in online product reviews? A persuasion knowledge approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 373-381.
    7. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    8. Chang-Dae Ham & Jeesun Kim, 2019. "The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 353-372, August.
    9. Zhou, Lianxi & Poon, Patrick & Wang, Haizhong, 2015. "Consumers' reactions to global versus local advertising appeals: A test of culturally incongruent images in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 561-568.
    10. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    11. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    12. Caldieraro, Fabio & Cunha, Marcus, 2022. "Consumers’ response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 724-744.
    13. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    14. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    15. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2021. "Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-563.
    16. Golovacheva, E., 2016. "When consumers activate persuasion knowledge: Review of antecedents and consequences," Working Papers 6440, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    17. J?rg Tropp & Corinna Beuthner, 2018. "Customers¡¯ Understanding of Engagement Advertising," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 57-76, December.
    18. Hsieh, Jung-Kuei, 2020. "The effects of transforming mobile services into mobile promotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 195-208.
    19. Liu, Martin J. & Yannopoulou, Natalia & Bian, Xuemei & Elliott, Richard, 2015. "Authenticity Perceptions in the Chinese Marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-33.
    20. Pan, Yue & Zhang, Jason Q., 2011. "Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 598-612.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:26:y:2012:i:3:p:115-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-interactive-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.