Dynamics in consumer response to product unavailability: do stock-out reactions signal response to permanent assortment reductions?
This paper investigates consumer reactions to out-of-stocks (OOS) – which are unexpected and temporary in nature – as opposed to permanent assortment reductions (PAR). We discuss similarities and differences between OOS and PAR reactions as well as their underlying factors, and empirically test our propositions in two product categories. Next, managerial implications are discussed. Our results indicate that retailer losses incurred in case of a PAR may be substantially larger than those in case of a stock- out for the same item, suggesting that retailers (i) should be cautious in extrapolating consumer response to stock-outs, to situations where the item would be permanently removed, (ii) should keep a minimum of variation in the assortment even if this implies a higher stock-out risk for these items, (iii) may wish to explicitly signal the temporary character of a stock-out by leaving the shelf space of the OOS item unused. The results further suggest that stock-out losses may disproportionally grow with stock-out frequency and duration, emphasizing that even if OOS cannot be completely avoided, efforts should be made to keep their occurrence and length within limits.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. " Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(4), pages 644-56, March.
- Fitzsimons, Gavan J, 2000. " Consumer Response to Stockouts," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27(2), pages 249-66, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:57:y:2004:i:8:p:834-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.