IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1792-d1595692.html

The Role of Social and Environmental CSR in Shaping Purchase Intentions: Experimental Evidence from the Cosmetics Market

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Zaborek

    (Department of International Business, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, al. Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Kurzak Mabrouk

    (Department of Commerce and Market Institutions, Krakow University of Economics, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on consumer purchasing decisions in the cosmetics market through an experimental design. Using eight scenarios that manipulate levels of social CSR, environmental CSR, and price, this study examined their direct effects and interactions, and the moderating influences of intrinsic and extrinsic motives. The findings confirmed that social and environmental CSR positively influence purchase intentions, with their combined effect being stronger than individual contributions. Price negatively moderates the impact of environmental CSR, particularly at higher levels, while intrinsic motives interact positively with environmental CSR to offset the negative association from its main effect. This research provides actionable insights into CSR’s role in shaping consumer behavior, emphasizing the interplay between CSR dimensions, price sensitivity, and motivational factors in the dynamic cosmetics market.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Zaborek & Anna Kurzak Mabrouk, 2025. "The Role of Social and Environmental CSR in Shaping Purchase Intentions: Experimental Evidence from the Cosmetics Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1792-:d:1595692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    2. Andrea Pérez & María del Mar García de los Salmones & Elisa Baraibar-Diez, 2020. "Effects of the Type of CSR Discourse for Utilitarian and Hedonic Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Lingbo Lyu & Li Zhai & Mohamed Boukhris & Ahsan Akbar, 2023. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Impulse Buying Intention: Exploring the Moderating Influence of Social Media Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Piotr Zaborek & Dominika Nowakowska, 2024. "Can Corporate Social Responsibility Shift Consumer Behavior? Insights from Scenario-Based Experiment in the Fast Fashion Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Mobin Fatma & Imran Khan, 2023. "An Integrative Framework to Explore Corporate Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility Association’s Influence on Consumer Responses in the Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Saeed Siyal & Munawar Javed Ahmed & Riaz Ahmad & Bushra Shahzad Khan & Chunlin Xin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention: Moderating Role of Green Brand Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Joohye Hwang & Xun Sun & Li Zhao & Song-yi Youn, 2024. "Sustainable Fashion in New Era: Exploring Consumer Resilience and Goals in the Post-Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Enrique Bianchi & Juan Manuel Bruno & Francisco J. Sarabia-Sanchez, 2019. "The impact of perceived CSR on corporate reputation and purchase intention," European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 206-221, February.
    10. Carolyn A. Lin & Xihui Wang & Yukyung Yang, 2023. "Sustainable Apparel Consumption: Personal Norms, CSR Expectations, and Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Shopping Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Hoang Tien Nguyen & Doan Minh Duc Le & Thien Thong Minh Ho & Phuong Mai Nguyen, 2020. "Enhancing sustainability in the contemporary model of CSR: a case of fast fashion industry in developing countries," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 578-591, May.
    12. Květa Olšanová & Andrea Escobar Ríos & Gina Cook & Petr Král & Marija Zlatić, 2021. "Impact of the awareness of brand-related CSR activities on purchase intention for luxury brands," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 597-618, May.
    13. Ishfaq Ahmed & Mian Sajid Nazir & Imran Ali & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Arooj Khalid & Muhammad Zeeshan Shaukat, 2020. "Investing In CSR Pays You Back in Many Ways! The Case of Perceptual, Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Tak Jie Chan & Norazah Mohd Suki & Phoebe Suet Yin Ho & Muhammad Farooq Akhtar, 2023. "Impact of corporate social responsibility practices on consumer purchase intention of apparel products with mediating role of consumer-retailer love," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(5), pages 998-1014, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Dressler, 2025. "SME Strategic Leadership and Grouping as Core Levers for Sustainable Transition—New Wine Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perihan Salah & Ahmed M. Asfahani & Faisal Hamad AlRajhi, 2024. "The Effect of Perceived Value on Intention to Purchase Pre-Loved Luxury Fashion Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Heydari, Ali & Laroche, Michel & Paulin, Michèle & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2021. "Hofstede's individual-level indulgence dimension: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Hye Jung Jung & HaeJung Kim & Kyung Wha Oh, 2016. "Green Leather for Ethical Consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating Ethical Consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 483-502, May.
    4. Padmavathy, Chandrasekaran & Swapana, Murali & Paul, Justin, 2019. "Online second-hand shopping motivation – Conceptualization, scale development, and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-32.
    5. Brand, Christian & Schwanen, Tim & Anable, Jillian, 2020. "‘Online Omnivores’ or ‘Willing but struggling’? Identifying online grocery shopping behavior segments using attitude theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Luis-Edwin Chimborazo-Azogue & Marta Frasquet & Alejandro Molla-Descals & Maria-Jose Miquel-Romero, 2021. "Understanding Mobile Showrooming Based on a Technology Acceptance and Use Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Luceri, Beatrice & (Tammo) Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Bellini, Silvia & Aiolfi, Simone, 2022. "What drives consumers to shop on mobile devices? Insights from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 178-196.
    8. Mengran Li & Ahmed Rabeeu, 2024. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Motivation Drives Customer Extra-Role Behavior and Green Purchase Intentions: The Role of Ethical Corporate Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-34, June.
    9. Kim, Jina & Park, Eunil, 2019. "Beyond coolness: Predicting the technology adoption of interactive wearable devices," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 114-119.
    10. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    11. Juliana Langgat & Boumediene Ramdani & Suzana Pavic & Evren Tok, 2023. "Environmentally Sustainable Practices and Hotel Performance: Evidence from Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Héctor Hugo Pérez-Villarreal & María Pilar Martínez-Ruiz & Alicia Izquierdo-Yusta & Carmen María Gómez-Cantó, 2020. "Food Values, Benefits and Their Influence on Attitudes and Purchase Intention: Evidence Obtained at Fast-Food Hamburger Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Xin Zhang & Jun Wan & Yongsheng Jin, 2023. "Exploring the Outcomes of Customer Engagement in DSR: The Role of Affective Commitment and Gamification Affordance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Sasichakorn Wongsaichia & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Johannes Schrank & Premchai Phoomsom & Kanjakhon Sirisoonthonkul & Vorrapol Paiyasen & Sedthawut Srichaingwang & Chavis Ketkaew, 2022. "Influences of Green Eating Behaviors Underlying the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Market Segmentation and Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Yun Wang, 2020. "The Roles of Hedonic Value and Fashion Consciousness in Female Shoes Purchase Context: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, July.
    16. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan & Feng, Wenting, 2019. "Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 682-693.
    18. Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J. & Jager, Wander, 2004. "A conceptual model of channel choice: measuring online and offline shopping value perceptions," Research Report 04F04, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    20. Hoffmann, Stefan & Soyez, Katja, 2010. "A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 778-785, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1792-:d:1595692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.