IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v200y2025ics0148296325004928.html

Success of mass customization toolkits: Product design typicality as boundary condition

Author

Listed:
  • Zaggl, Michael A.
  • Linzmajer, Marc
  • Walsh, Gianfranco
  • Reinhardt, Ronny
  • Pottbäcker, Judith

Abstract

Mass customization toolkits are often unsuccessful in inducing purchases of self-designed products. By adopting a user-centric view, the current study proposes that category involvement might function as an antecedent of purchase intentions, mediated by customers’ category–self-connection and moderated by perceived product design typicality. Leveraging attachment and categorization theory, we hypothesize that highly involved users already possess a strong sense of category–self-connection, which interferes with their purchase decisions if self-designed products appear typical of the product category rather than unique. Three studies test this theorizing. Study 1 (field study) demonstrates that category involvement increases actual purchase intentions. Study 2 (experiment) shows that the relationship between category involvement and purchase intentions is mediated by category–self-connection, as well as negatively moderated by perceived product design typicality. Study 3 (field study) corroborates the findings in another context (cars). The combined findings lead to theoretical and practical implications for user toolkits and their design.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaggl, Michael A. & Linzmajer, Marc & Walsh, Gianfranco & Reinhardt, Ronny & Pottbäcker, Judith, 2025. "Success of mass customization toolkits: Product design typicality as boundary condition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004928
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004928
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatty, Sharon E. & Homer, Pamela & Kahle, Lynn R., 1988. "The involvement--commitment model: Theory and implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 149-167, March.
    2. de Bellis, Emanuel & Sprott, David E. & Herrmann, Andreas & Bierhoff, Hans-Werner & Rohmann, Elke, 2016. "The Influence of Trait and State Narcissism on the Uniqueness of Mass-Customized Products," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 162-172.
    3. Kurt Matzler & Daniel Stieger & Johann Füller, 2011. "Consumer Confusion in Internet-Based Mass Customization: Testing a Network of Antecedents and Consequences," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-247, June.
    4. Tian, Kelly Tepper & Bearden, William O & Hunter, Gary L, 2001. "Consumer's Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 50-66, June.
    5. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    6. Cindy Chan & Jonah Berger & Leaf Van Boven, 2012. "Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 561-573.
    7. Jihyun Kim & Gargi Bhaduri, 2019. "Self-monitoring tendency and fashion involvement: Antecedents and consequences of perceived relative value of mass-customized fashion products in a gift-giving context," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 324-341, October.
    8. Eric von Hippel & Ralph Katz, 2002. "Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 821-833, July.
    9. Maxwell, Sarah, 2002. "Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 191-212, April.
    10. Pallant, Jessica & Sands, Sean & Karpen, Ingo, 2020. "Product customization: A profile of consumer demand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Babin, Barry J. & Babin, Laurie, 2001. "Seeking something different? A model of schema typicality, consumer affect, purchase intentions and perceived shopping value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 89-96, November.
    12. Bharadwaj, Neeraj & Naylor, Rebecca Walker & ter Hofstede, Frenkel, 2009. "Consumer response to and choice of customized versus standardized systems," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 216-227.
    13. Pallant, Jessica L. & Karpen, Ingo O. & Sands, Sean J., 2022. "What drives consumers to customize products? The mediating role of brand experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Nikolaus Franke & Martin Schreier, 2008. "Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 93-107, June.
    15. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Gilles Laurent, 1985. "Measuring consumer involvement profiles," Post-Print hal-00786781, HAL.
    16. Ursula Scholl-Grissemann & Nicola E. Stokburger-Sauer & Karin Teichmann, 2022. "The importance of perceived fairness in product customization settings," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(11-12), pages 823-842, September.
    17. Kaufmann, Hans Ruediger & Petrovici, Dan Alex & Filho, Cid Gonçalves & Ayres, Adriano, 2016. "Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5735-5747.
    18. Paul Blazek, 2023. "Creating Customization Experiences: The Evolution of Product Configurators," Springer Books, in: Thomas Aichner & Fabrizio Salvador (ed.), Mass Customization and Customer Centricity, pages 179-209, Springer.
    19. Coulter, Robin A & Price, Linda L & Feick, Lawrence, 2003. "Rethinking the Origins of Involvement and Brand Commitment: Insights from Postsocialist Central Europe," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 151-169, September.
    20. Von Hippel, Eric A. & Katz, Ralph, 2002. "Shifting Innovation to Users Via Toolkits," Working papers 4232-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    21. Frances Turner & Aurélie Merle & David Gotteland, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Post-Print hal-04752663, HAL.
    22. Stefan F. Bernritter & Paul E. Ketelaar & Francesca Sotgiu, 2021. "Behaviorally targeted location-based mobile marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 677-702, July.
    23. Frances Turner & Aurélie Merle & David Gotteland, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04752663, HAL.
    24. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Ratneshwar, S. & Sen, Sankar, 2012. "Drivers of consumer–brand identification," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 406-418.
    25. Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel & Simkin, Lyndon, 2022. "Discovering the dark side of brand attachment: Impulsive buying, obsessive-compulsive buying and trash talking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 442-453.
    26. Sucharita Chandran & Vicki G. Morwitz, 2005. "Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers' Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 249-259, September.
    27. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2015. "Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 137-145.
    28. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    29. Mochon, Daniel & Norton, Michael I. & Ariely, Dan, 2012. "Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 363-369.
    30. C. Page Moreau & Kelly B. Herd, 2010. "To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers' Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 806-819, February.
    31. Turner, Frances & Merle, Aurélie & Gotteland, David, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 473-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoqun & Sun, Qingzhou, 2026. "When customization mode meets product innovativeness: How their match drives consumer purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Ettis, Saïd Aboubaker & Sellami, Achraf, 2025. "“I'll do it for myself†: Enhancing customer value through online product customization experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Krause, Franziska & Görgen, Jonas & de Bellis, Emanuel & Franke, Nikolaus & Burghartz, Pia & Klanner, Ilse-Maria & Häubl, Gerald, 2023. "One-of-a-kind products: Leveraging strict uniqueness in mass customization," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 823-840.
    4. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Ratneshwar, S. & Sen, Sankar, 2012. "Drivers of consumer–brand identification," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 406-418.
    5. Qin, Yao & Wang, Xuehua, 2023. "Power distance belief and the desire for uniqueness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Berghueser, Sophie M. & Spann, Martin, 2025. "The value of distinctiveness: Product uniqueness in crypto marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 573-593.
    7. Jennifer K D’Angelo & Kristin Diehl & Lisa A Cavanaugh, 2019. "Lead by Example? Custom-Made Examples Created by Close Others Lead Consumers to Make Dissimilar Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 750-773.
    8. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Gaetano Nino Miceli & Stefania Farace, 2013. "Self o mass branding? La relazione tra personalizzazione e marca," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(4), pages 149-171.
    9. Colleen E. McClure & Justin M. Lawrence & Todd J. Arnold & Lisa K. Scheer, 2023. "The opportunities and costs of highly involved organizational buyers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 480-501, March.
    10. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola E. & Teichmann, Karin, 2013. "Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 889-896.
    11. Annika Wiecek & Daniel Wentzel & Aras Erkin, 2020. "Just print it! The effects of self-printing a product on consumers’ product evaluations and perceived ownership," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 795-811, July.
    12. M. Rodríguez-Santos & Ana González-Fernández & Miguel Cervantes-Blanco, 2013. "An analysis of the construct “involvement” in consumer behaviour," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1105-1123, February.
    13. Yongzhong Yang & Yimin Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2024. "Co-creation and Consumers’ Willingness to Pay Premium: Effect of Involvement and Satisfaction with Co-creation Process," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10151-10173, September.
    14. Xuemei Bian & Sadia Haque, 2020. "Counterfeit versus original patronage: Do emotional brand attachment, brand involvement, and past experience matter?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 438-451, July.
    15. Thapa, Sajani & Guzmán, Francisco & Paswan, Audhesh, 2024. "We are just 10 feet away! How does location-based advertising affect consumer-brand engagement?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Inwon Kang & Deokhee Cheon & Matthew Shin, 2011. "Advertising strategy for outbound travel services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(4), pages 361-380, December.
    17. Pedro Julián Ramírez Angulo & Edison Jair Duque Oliva, 2013. "Involucramiento de producto y lealtad de marca para productos de consumo masivo en Bogotá D.C," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi.
    18. Nikolaus Franke & Martin Schreier & Ulrike Kaiser, 2010. "The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 125-140, January.
    19. Nguyen, Hang T. & Zhang, Yufei & Calantone, Roger J., 2018. "Brand portfolio coherence: Scale development and empirical demonstration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 60-80.
    20. Minzhe Yi & Zihao Huang & Yuxiang Yu, 2022. "Creating a Sustainable E-Commerce Environment: The Impact of Product Configurator Interaction Design on Consumer Personalized Customization Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325004928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.