IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v195y2025ics0148296325002322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Force majeure in business relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Burkhart, Davide
  • Bode, Christoph

Abstract

The management literature traditionally views ‘force majeure’ in business relationships as the result of exogenous events, that is, the consequence of external unforeseeable and irresistible catastrophes outside of human control. Yet, recent events suggest that companies frequently invoke force majeure for purposes beyond excusing non-performance due to genuine force majeure events. Drawing on expectancy violation theory and employing a sequential empirical research design – including an analysis of force majeure declarations at a focal firm, semi-structured interviews, and an experiment – this study examines the expectations and outcomes associated with force majeure in buyer–supplier relationships. Contrary to the extant literature, our findings suggest that force majeure declarations are, under certain conditions, used as a pretext or strategic tool to address other underlying issues in the business relationship. Our study broadens the understanding of force majeure declarations in business relationships offers significant managerial insights for effectively navigating force majeure-related challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Burkhart, Davide & Bode, Christoph, 2025. "Force majeure in business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002322
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002322
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.